I missed the Emmy Awards earlier this week. I barely knew they were happening, and I didn’t really care, even though I’m a big TV watcher and this year’s broadcast actually attracted many more viewers than the show has in recent years.
I rarely make a big ritual out of watching any of the annual award ceremonies. I’m a filmmaker and a film fanatic, but there are many years when I even have to build up the energy to watch the Oscars. But I was particularly disinterested in the Emmy broadcast this year, and glancing at the nominees and the winners, I realize why: I don’t watch those shows. I watch “bad TV.”
That wasn’t always the case. There used to be a time when “my shows” were the critically-acclaimed ones: The Wire, The Sopranos, 24, The West Wing, The X-Files, Sex and the City. They had relatively large audiences, and they won all the awards. But even after any of those shows lost their mojo, after some of them jumped the shark, I kept watching. I can be a very loyal viewer.
But now, the big hits are Lost on me. (Pun intended: I watched nothing but the series finale of that particular show.)
First of all, I am committed to several summer series, which are supposed to be the worst of the worst, at least on network TV. These are the offerings that didn’t make the Fall lineups and will never get Emmy nods.
Before I’ll watch my DVR’d Mad Men, a big Emmy-winner this year, I’ll subject myself to the derivative melodramatic stylings of ABC’s The Gates, which is HBO’s True Blood, cleaned-up, PG-13′d, and transported from Louisiana to a gated community seemingly just outside Celebration, USA. The Gates isn’t as good (or risque) as True Blood, but I am there every week, and not because I have a particular hankering for vampires, or werewolves, or witches, or anything else, though Buffy the Vampire Slayer gets my idiosyncratic nod for the best TV show of the 90s (and early 2000s).
And The Gates isn’t even the worst show that I watch. It is probably head and shoulder’s above something like NBC’s Person’s Unknown, another summer-time offering that seems Lost-like in its fly-by-the-seat-of-its-pants disregard for any eventual narratalogical destination/closure. And I’ll also catch-up on that show before I get to Mad Men. (And not just because AMC has the nerve NOT to be in HD, at least not on DirecTV. The televisual inhumanity!)
One of the problems with watching these shows, of course, is that they don’t last very long, sometimes not even a full season. Few people are watching them—sometimes, I fear, its only me. And the networks will pull them before they have a chance to say goodbye to fans (or, in some cases, fan).
Mad Men is an outstanding drama, and it is the only current Emmy-caliber show that I watch. I’m sure that most of this year’s other nominees are also very good programs (though I can’t, for the life of me, figure out what all the fuss is about Modern Family.) I’ll just stick with my schlocky summer fare. And I’ll probably gravitate to the worst new shows in the Fall, too. I was one of the 17 people religiously watching FlashForward (before it got cancelled). And I suspect that a similar fate awaits me when I sit down for the series premiere of The Event.


9 Responses to The Best TV Is Bad TV
jffoster - September 4, 2010 at 12:33 pm
Just don’t take that job lying down.
aristof_ns - September 4, 2010 at 6:13 pm
What, no CSI Miami? That’s not even a summer show, and it’s been around for awhile. But it is laughable — even the camera work is noticeably bad!
trendisnotdestiny - September 5, 2010 at 9:27 am
Reading before television… avoid the mind rot
goxewu - September 5, 2010 at 1:38 pm
The gap between what Prof. Jackson regards as the “good” TV he doesn’t like (e.g., “Modern Family”) and the “bad” TV he likes (e.g., “The Gates”), is about a millimeter on a scale of the diameter of the solar system. His range of consideration seems to be confined to middle-of-the-road, overproduced, stubble-intense network stuff, essentially soap operas with special effects, with an occasional foray (“Mad Men”) into cable and premium cable (“True Blood”).Outside Prof. Jackson’s peripheral vision lies a lot of much better television (mostly on niche-market cable networks such as Fuse, and ol’ reliable PBS), and a lot of truly bad–and truly enjoyable because it’s so truly bad–television: LMN movies, cheaply made true-crime documentaries, particularly if they’re only half an hour per episode and involve re-enactments, screaming-pundit shows, and whatever reality show suits your personal taste.The best alternative, I find, is simply to say to myself that I’m going to watch, say, forty-five minutes of television in general, and then surf. My rule of thumb: Anything is worth watching for five minutes, but nothing is worth watching for more than five minutes.
_perplexed_ - September 7, 2010 at 6:23 pm
I can’t recall the last time I saw a TV show (or a movie, for that matter) and thought “I’m sure glad I saw that.” Sometime last year maybe?
pcoop - September 8, 2010 at 7:51 am
Is there a relationship between being an academic and not liking to watch TV? Or is it a generational thing? I’m a faculty member in my early 30s, and I grew up — nay, subsisted on — TV: the Saturday morning cartoons, the “Golden Girls”/”Empty Nest”/”Father Dowling Mysteries”-type fare. I was a devotee of the 90s genre shows: “Friends,” “ER,” “The X-Files,” “NYPD Blue,” and now eat up episodes “True Blood,” “Glee,” “Modern Family,” and any “Law & Order” rerun. My engagement with pop culture through televeision is what sustains me and gives my otherwise bored brain inspiration. I’m most satisfied when I see something on TV and can–whether in class or purely just for personal satisfcation–connect it to a piece of literature or an organizational theory.I’d rather turn the TV on than read, and my brain seems to be doing fine. Or is brain rot one of those things I won’t notice until I’m zxiafhuapwe….
pcoop - September 8, 2010 at 12:43 pm
Judging by the number of typos in my entry above, I’d say the rot has probably already started.
drnels - September 8, 2010 at 6:40 pm
Hey, I’m excited about the premiere of “America’s Next Top Model” in ninety minutes. And I’m a tenured chair of a department. Judge me as you will. And shall I make it worse? I’m going to watch “Hellcats” right after ANTM and see if it’s worth adding to my weekly list.And “True Blood” is in a class of its own. When I show up on campus on Mondays, staff call me into their offices to talk about it. My faculty colleagues? No interest. But that’s a show I watch at least three times each week to catch everything in it.And “Gossip Girl” premieres Monday!
matthewsm - September 9, 2010 at 10:09 am
Whatever, trendisnotdestiny! I’m too busy watching old episodes of The Muppet Show on TV Land. If you think reading post-modernist critiques of Kafkaesque tropes of alienation is more engrossing than watching Gonzo jump over a giant steaming bowl of oatmeal on a motorcycle, then…go sit in the balcony box with Statler and Waldorf. Oh yes, and one more thing: “Mnah mnah!”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xhuyv-2GhNI