Man, these survivor shows are popping up everywhere. Did you read about the one in Malaysia with the wannabe imams? And now there’s one about us academics. Called Survivor: Academe, it’s on The Learning Channel (2:00 a.m. Tuesdays). If you missed the first episode, I can tell you all about it. It’s a lot like Bravo’s Work of Art and Project Runway, only instead of artists or fashion designers, it has five assistant professors from the Cultural Studies Department at Westbrook College, a small, select liberal-arts college in New Jersey. (I know, I know, it’s a crazy place what with so many assistant professors in one small department.) They’re vying for the double grand prize of tenure and an office with a window.
On the first episode, the five contestants were nervous wrecks. One guy fussed obsessively with his goatee, and one of the women kept reaching up to twiddle her Peruvian earrings. They ranged from a guy with a Ph.D. from Harvard (I didn’t catch his last name, but it came with the Roman numeral “III” suffix), to a single mother who’d worked her way through Wayne State University waitressing in a bowling alley bar at night. They’re all pretty telegenic, to my eye, and one candidate even has an adorable tiny tattoo on her arm (a portrait of Julia Kristeva as an angel). I’m not sure yet who my fave is, but I think I’m leaning toward the guy with the blonde cornrows whose research is the semiotics of Little Princess beauty pageants. (I know I’m not supposed to notice these things, but let me tell you, he’s one hot hunk.)
The six judges are a dean (the doofus kept looking at his watch), a provost wearing an American flag lapel pin and a tie clip in the shape of a yellow goldfinch, which he told everyone is the New Jersey state bird, two semi-retired octogenarian faculty members (one showing off a bracelet saying, “Yes I Can”), a buildings-and-grounds worker, and a Vice President for the North Parking Lot.
Each week the candidates are presented with a different challenge. In the first episode (the only one aired so far), the challenge was to get a five-page article accepted in a peer-reviewed journal. It was oh-so-tense watching everyone frantically type away for a full day on their laptops. Afterwards, we got to listen to the contestants whispering on their cell phones to their dissertation advisers, asking them to put in a good word with their inside contacts at various journals. I was surprised at how most of those advisers seemed so stand-offish toward their former students, but a couple of them said no problem, the article was as good as published. The guy who lost the first round was chewed out big-time by the judges for being so naive as to think that anybody would print an article arguing that the textual evidence proves Ayn Rand and I.F. Stone were lovers.
The nine remaining episodes will present the contestants with some even tougher challenges:
1. Standing up at a departmental faculty meeting and disagreeing with a tenured full professor who’s known as the departmental bully.
2. Applying for four weeks off to tend to a child whom the middle school counselor says has “thumb-sucking issues.”
3. Handling a grade protest from a sobbing female student who got a B- and wants an A so she can get into law school. (Her father is the college’s chief counsel.)
4. Finding a way to get off the Outcomes Assessment Committee.
5. Learning Blackboard 14, including the nine-step clicking and dragging procedure that permits students to combine their Facebook and Twitter pages and convert them into term papers.
6. Getting an invitation to present a paper at the MLA convention, with the caveat that if more than six people fall asleep during the presentation of the paper, the contestant will be automatically eliminated. (If the total attendance at the presentation is fewer than six, the contestant is eliminated if one person falls asleep.)
7. Serving as faculty adviser to one of the following student clubs: The Subatomic-Particle Physics Club, The We’re Off to Antarctica Club, or the Fancy Worms Cooking Club.
8. Purchasing online, and immediately wearing on campus (no exchanges permitted), a complete new faculty outfit. The women will be permitted to order only pastel pantsuits from Talbot’s and the men permitted to order only tweed jackets with suede elbow patches and light khakis from L.L. Bean.
9. Leading a group of 7th-grade students and their parents on a tour of the campus, followed by conducting a question and answer session on the importance of Cultural Studies to the off-campus community.
The last episode is going to be a real nail-biter. The final two contestants will have 72 hours to write and get published a book (no re-worked dissertations allowed), and have it garner a positive review from The Journal of Post-Post-Cultural Studies. The Web site says that if Survivor: Academe gets the ratings TLC is hoping for in the crucial 35-72 sedentary-in-an-isolated-college-town age bracket, the network will green-light a second season. We’ll get to see five more faculty members compete, this time to see who can get favorable student evaluations while actually handing out a C.


8 Responses to ‘Survivor: Academe’
deanette - July 29, 2010 at 7:18 pm
Thanks for the great laugh at the end of a long hot day. Funny and smart!
fullgrad - July 30, 2010 at 12:31 am
Funny!
drtdowney - July 30, 2010 at 7:58 am
Finally, a show I can really get my teeth into and care about!
dank48 - July 30, 2010 at 9:32 am
Nice. It’s not easy to do satire these days, when reality itself seems intent on the same thing.
glord - July 30, 2010 at 1:50 pm
Ohhh; it was satire. Sounded real to me.
trendisnotdestiny - July 30, 2010 at 3:42 pm
You have an immunities left over? I spouted off to the wrong department chair about their bloated sense of self importance and ability to suck out all the joy in a room much like a deatheater. It didn’t help that I asked them if he/she remembers when they first sold out. Now we are talking uncomfortable silences….P.S. none of this is true, but it felt so good writing it much like reading your article!
performance_expert2 - August 1, 2010 at 6:32 am
A fine satire, though I avoid American television. The only time I am exposed to it is the wall screen in the doctor waiting room or in a stayover at a hotel, which cooincidentally I just did twenty-four hours ago and I am keenly aware of what I see when I first turn on the set and advance through the channels and what I saw was a number of commercials for pharmaceuticals (these same commercials are not allowed in europe because of the increased cost that is passed on to the customers) and at about the tenth channel flip, there it was- American media prime time graphic violence, a man (white male of course) who was wheezing and heaving while choking someone to death with both hands. The framing was from the wrists up and when the man had finished his gruesome fictitious task, he stared with vacant wild eyes.I imagine a lot of American tv actors have vacant stares. They even have their own religion to sooth them, Scientology.
dr_redrum - August 2, 2010 at 3:26 pm
I heard on Howard Stern this morning that TLC has another show in the works about the mean, cruel and rotten things people post to academic blogs. If I recall correctly, it will be called “Snark Attack.”