One of the most important education lines in President Obama’s speech was: “We will expand our commitment to charter schools.” This is best understood not in terms of any particular public policies but rather in terms of the awesome power presidents have to define the boundaries of public debate. To see evidence of this in education, we need go no further than Obama’s predecessor.
Education was one of the most important issues in the early pre-9/11 Bush presidency, with intense negotiations around the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (which ultimately led to No Child Left Behind). As Nicholas Lemann described in a terrific New Yorker article, in mid-2001 the press was mainly focused on one issue: vouchers. This was understandable; the standard conservative Republican line on federal education policy had been, since at least the Reagan era, mainly about abolishing the U.S. Department of Education and privatizing K-12 schools through vouchers.
But Bush wasn’t interested in that. Instead, he went the opposite way, empowering the feds and focusing on improving public schools through test-based accountability. Reasonable people can disagree about how well this worked, but it’s very clear that it had the effect of marginalizing vouchers and privatization as national issues. Organizations like the Heritage Foundation, which are influential in many other areas, were completely shut out of the D.C. education debate. If you define yourself as being more extreme and conservative on an issue than a president who is widely seen as extreme and conservative, you don’t leave yourself much space to stand.
Obama’s forceful position on charter schools is likely to have the same effect, but this time on those who want no forms of choice in public education at all, who reject the idea of letting independent, mostly non-profit organizations run public schools. If you believe, as some people do, that charter schools are nothing more than a stalking horse for the Wal-Martification of public education, you’re in for a long eight years.
-

Carl Elliott
is a professor of bioethics at the University of Minnesota. His books include White Coat, Black Hat: Adventures on the Dark Side of Medicine.
Read Carl's posts
-
David P. Barash
is an evolutionary biologist and professor of psychology at the University of Washington.
Read David's posts
-

Gina Barreca
is a professor of English and feminist theory at the University of Connecticut.
Read Gina's posts
Jacques Berlinerblau
is director of the Program for Jewish Civilization at Georgetown University.
Read Jacques's posts
-

Kevin Carey
is the policy director for Education Sector, an independent think tank in Washington.
Read Kevin's posts
-

Laurie Essig
teaches at Middlebury College and is the author of American Plastic: Boob Jobs, Credit Cards and Our Quest for Perfection.
Read Laurie's posts
-

-

Marc Bousquet
is the author of How the University Works: Higher Education and the Low-Wage Nation.
Read Marc's posts
-

-

Michael Ruse
directs the program in history and philosophy of science at Florida State University. His forthcoming book is Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science.
Read Michael's posts
-

Michele Goodwin
is a professor of law at the University of Minnesota with joint appointments at the university's medical and public-health schools.
Read Michele's posts
-

Todd Gitlin
is a professor of journalism and sociology and chair of the communications program at Columbia University, and a prolific author whose most recent book is a novel, Undying.
Read Todd's posts
About This Blog
Posts on Brainstorm present the views of their authors. They do not represent the position of the editors, nor does posting here imply any endorsement by The Chronicle.
Brainstorm Bloggers
Recent Posts
Archives
Follow Brainstorm through your favorite RSS reader.

