• Sunday, February 19, 2012

Previous

Next

Neither Supermom nor Superprofessor

September 28, 2009, 4:04 pm

Hi, Miroslava, I’m your “childless academic peer.”

I read Professor Chávez-García’s article called “Superprofessor Meets Supermom,” and I could only think about how absolutely middling my own ambition and performance has been in comparison to hers.

I have to say that I was bothered by Professor Chávez-García’s rather smug — or at least it seemed that way to me — reference to her envy of her “childless academic peers”: “Unlike my childless academic peers, I do not have the luxury — and, yes, it is a luxury I covet — of spending all my time conducting research or simply thinking about the significance of my work.”

Do you think that just because people don’t have kids they don’t have lives?

Do you think that somehow not having a small child actually frees you having the burden of an emotional life?

This is in no way to detract from my colleague’s courageous and daunting ambitions. As a number of the responses to Professor Chávez-García’s article pointed out, many people feel comforted and inspired to know that there are others who wish for big families, big scholarly reputations; I have nothing but admiration for those who are willing to make their dreams public.

My dreams, however, at least these days, have a far more limited scope.

Mostly, I want to get through the day intact.

Not only have I never wished to hold any kind of administrative position in my department or university, but there are times when having an administrative position in my own office — or even kitchen — have seemed overwhelming.

There are days when I mismatch my socks and not on purpose.

There are days when I misspell the word “broccoli” on my shopping list.

I have two stepsons whom I did not raise from their infancy, but acquired only after they were housebroken, when they were in their early teens, and who are now at that absolutely adorable age when they have both finished law school, and have their own complex lives to worry about. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

I don’t wish for a larger family. In fact, I spend a great deal of time ignoring some family members that I do have; my own beloved spouse would include himself, on occasion, in this category.

Let’s put it this way: This morning I resented having to feed my three cats and did so only because I knew: 1) If I didn’t feed them, they would sweep every random earring I have piled on my dresser onto the floor or under the bed (one cat will in fact carry earrings into the litter box); 2) They can’t open those little flip-top cans themselves.

Maybe it’s the difference between being in your forties and being in your fifties. I am willing to accept other people’s kids as my own by proxy.

I often crib the lines from Goodbye, Mr. Chips, when, on his deathbed, people bemoan the fact that he never had children, and he says, “Oh, yes, I did, and they were all boys.” I have a couple of hundred kids a year, and all of them are college students.

“The pressure to be superprofessor, as we all know, comes with the territory in academe. Every two years, one must present a decent record of scholarship, teaching, and service,” says Professor Chávez-García.

What’s the difference between being a “superprofessor” and a good professor?

After all, to be a faculty member at any university is an enormously privileged position.  Maybe you don’t get a cape. Or a parade. Or, for that matter, a raise.

Hell, it’s just really good to have a job.

I want to say that again.

Being a faculty member at a university or college or community college is an enormously privileged position.

It’s not something you get because you were good in school or because people thought you were clever; it’s not something you get because you’re outspoken or wisecracking; it’s not something you get because you’re diligent or devoted. It’s a position that you earn because you’re enormously exceptional.

There are a lot of people who are qualified for these jobs, and a lot of them will never get full-time university tenure-track teaching positions because they are occupied by people who consider every act of scholarship, every “mind-numbing meeting,” and every moment they “stand before a group of students,” a burden.

This entry was posted in Books. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment (8)

8 Responses to Neither Supermom nor Superprofessor

literarytype - September 28, 2009 at 4:58 pm

A THREE KIDS’ PARENT? Not in the job description. AND GOOD for you for pointing it out. WE ARE WIMPS. TOO many faculty members are GUILTED into saying they are happy when they have to do work for those who have a lot of kids and who do not pull their own weight. I’m tired of it. I am exhausted by the demands of people who have more children than they can handle. Forget their selfish agendas. Get a grip. Do your own work. or get another job. Seem the lists? There are plenty of people–and female–who would not complain.

kjct06 - September 28, 2009 at 5:29 pm

I’m glad that someone said the unsayable.Let me put my bias right out there. It’s only fair. I’m 36. I have no children. I like to think of myself as an about-to-be professor. So, sure, I’m possibly bitter from child-envy and tenure-track envy. Sure. My choice to not have children (so far) has been a difficult one. I’m not immune to the alluring smell of baby hair nor the seductive chubby swell of baby torsos. I love babies. I love them so much that I have chosen not to have them in situations that would not allow me to happily balance my life. Some people might say (and have) that I don’t have a natural maternal impulse. I would say that my maternal impulse is so strong that I refuse to have children until I can give them enough of myself to justify the choice. I also understand that children are exhausting and wonderful. My best friend has three children, all of whom are lovely and difficult as children will be. When I visit her, I do her dishes, pick up the clothes, and play hide-and-seek so she can enjoy 15 minutes of silence and rest. I support mothers and the wonderful work they do.But if someone chooses to try to balance children and a professorship, that’s ultimately their choice. Hopefully, they know before making that decision the difficulty that this will present. I object to the idea that choosing motherhood should somehow mean an exemption from the responsibilities of professorship. None of us enter this field without realizing what it means. Sure, I’ll sympathize with the difficulties balancing motherhood and professorship must present. But I also don’t think it means that one should forget what a luxury either opportunity presents. Both, I hope, are ultimately carefully-thought out choices and not burdens.

rightwingprofessor - September 29, 2009 at 9:14 am

kjct: Until you have enough time to give yourself the choice? You might already be out of time. Your fertility is probably only 1/3 of what it was 12 years ago and it will rapidly decline over the next 5 years, please don’t wait any longer!

lill5353 - September 29, 2009 at 11:02 am

OK Gina — this is why I’m afraid to write about motherhood & academia! Loved your post, but the kind of conversation this topic generates seems to prey on my every last livin’ insecurity. BTW, people with kids know all too well that people w/o kids DO have lives (it is the source of all our envy)! But the good thing about kids is that after the age of, say, three, THEY can open those little flip-top cans themselves — our cat is on her own.

classicalprof - September 30, 2009 at 4:21 pm

Thanks for this, Gina. As a currently childless prof who may change that status in the future, I clicked on the article anticipating an interesting look at work/family balance. But when I got to that low-blow I just stopped reading.

classicalprof - September 30, 2009 at 4:21 pm

Thanks for this, Gina. As a currently childless prof who may change that status in the future, I clicked on the article anticipating an interesting look at work/family balance. But when I got to that low-blow I just stopped reading.

classicalprof - September 30, 2009 at 4:22 pm

Thanks for this, Gina. As a currently childless prof who may change that status in the future, I clicked on the article anticipating an interesting look at work/family balance. But when I got to that low-blow I just stopped reading.

goxewu - September 30, 2009 at 4:30 pm

Once the kids are here, of course, the village should pitch in to help raise them because the welfare of the children is a matter of the common good.But beforehand? Which is to say why is it part of the duty of the village (geographical, political, occupational, etc.) to help a middle-class academic have a third–or second or even a first–child? Last time I looked, there was no population shortage requiring no patriotic/societal imperative to reproduce (e.g., between-the-Wars France). Lots of people live perfectly satisfying lives without biological progeny. What’s with this great sense of deprivation on the part of academic females (and, I presume, some academic males) if their jobs, careers, and extra-parental ambitions don’t easily permit them to have kids?And what’s with rightwingprofessor actually telling kjcto6 “please don’t wait any longer!”? Is RWP willing to midwife, nanny and pay for preschool and school should having a child turn out to be a disaster for kjcto6? This seems to me like the childbirth version of “Let’s you and him fight.”