• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Harvard vs. the Internet

June 9, 2010, 1:00 pm

Donald H. Pfister, Dean of Harvard Summer School, has sent a letter in response to my recent column and follow-up blog post. It is reprinted in full below.

Dean Pfister is right to note that Harvard Summer School has been operating successfully for a long time, since 1871. This is important context that I should have provided to readers.

That said, nothing in his letter contradicts anything I wrote. Harvard Summer School is an open admissions program taught by a combination of Harvard professors and people who are not Harvard professors. It markets itself as an opportunity to pay thousands of dollars to live in Natalie Portman’s old dorm, which is kind of creepy. And Harvard College does not accept credits earned from Harvard Summer School’s online courses.

Dean Pfister explains this last fact as simply a function of general university policy. “No online credit from any institution can be used toward graduation,” he writes. Really! That’s remarkable. Harvard believes that this particular mode of communication—one that has become an integral part of the way people in modern society live and interact, to the point where roughly one quarter of all college students take courses online—is so illegitimate that the university categorically refuses to recognize courses so taught, even courses that Harvard itself has, to quote Dean Pfister again, subjected to scrutiny whereby the courses are “vetted by departments to ensure they meet the standards for Harvard College credit.” Either that or they haven’t been subjected to such scrutiny, which re-raises the question of why they’re being sold as “Harvard” courses that are publicly advertised as “rigorous,” “Harvard-caliber,” and so forth.

Discriminating against a widely used method of teaching based solely on the mode of delivery irrespective of the course content, curriculum, instructor, assessment standards, etc. strikes me as a remarkably retrograde approach to higher learning for a major research university in 2010.

Here’s the letter:

Dear Editor of the Chronicle of Higher Education,

I am writing to clarify several statements made regarding Harvard Summer School in Kevin Carey’s commentary, “The Chimera of College Brands,” published June 6.

To provide context, Harvard Summer School has been in existence since 1871 and is the oldest academic summer session in the United States. The mission of the school is to open Harvard’s academic resources to a diverse audience during an intensive summer session. The school offers more than 300 courses in subjects in the sciences, humanities and writing. Included in this count are a small number of online courses. In addition, we offer 25 study abroad programs led by faculty directors. Students experience rigorous courses, study in world-class libraries, and can get hands on experience in state-of-the-art laboratories.

Approximately two-thirds of our faculty are affiliated with Harvard, including some of Harvard’s most distinguished teachers. The rest are visiting faculty members from other institutions, including nearby schools such as Boston University, the Museum of Fine Arts, Brandeis University and more distant schools such as University of Chicago, North Carolina State, and the Naval War College. All liberal arts courses are vetted by departments to ensure they meet the standards for Harvard College credit.

Our student population is diverse, encompassing traditional undergraduate and graduate students, working professionals studying for professional advancement, and students of all ages studying for personal enrichment or degree credit. Approximately 20% of our students are Harvard undergraduate or graduate students, in Arts and Sciences or from the professional schools, studying to fulfill degree requirements. It is true that enrollment is open to all with the exception of those courses offered abroad and in the Secondary School program where there is application and review.

Harvard College does indeed count the liberal arts courses and study abroad programs toward a Harvard degree and, having vetted them through the academic departments and programs, the courses often carry credit in the General Education program. As a matter of policy Harvard College does not accept online course credit. Thus, the 14 online courses we offer cannot be used to fulfill degree requirements by Harvard College students.

Indeed, no online credit from any institution can be used toward graduation. Most institutions accept our on-campus and online courses for transfer credit, although we advise students to check with their home institutions in advance of registering. In short, these are not “fake”Harvard credits but rather courses that receive scrutiny at various levels and courses that offer Harvard College and other students special opportunities, for example, to study languages not offered in other venues, to do hands on research in labs, and to study in the arts.

I hope that these brief comments regarding our programs, offerings, and activities help to set the record straight regarding Mr. Carey’s misconception about our serious academic commitment.

Yours truly,

Donald H. Pfister

Dean of Harvard Summer School

Asa Gray Professor of Systematic Botany and Curator of the Farlow Library and Herbarium Harvard University

This entry was posted in Books. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment (11)

11 Responses to Harvard vs. the Internet

nyhist - June 10, 2010 at 10:14 am

As DUS in my department I carefully checked out those online courses that students wanted to offer for credit in our university. I insisted on seeing the syllabus and requirements. Most such students were not history majors but were students in other depts who needed a history course to graduate. Some of the courses I refused; some I accepted, and I always told the students why I made those decisions. Harvard makes it easier by just refusing from the get-go. That is a possible solution even for classes offered in the summer school, since that school operates differently from the rest of the university.

haohtt - June 10, 2010 at 10:32 am

I would agree with Mr. Carey, that if Harvard, as a policy, concedes that it is incapable of developing online courses that are of sufficient quality to be transferred into Harvard College, then it should not try to offer online courses (other than non-credit CEU-type professional development courses). What is intended to be a simple case of Harvard academic snobbery is, in fact, nothing more than academic hypocrisy.

7738373863 - June 10, 2010 at 10:53 am

Harvard may be acting hypocritically as regards its online course policy, but it is hardly running the bait-and-switch operation that Kevin Carey suggested was the case in yesterday’s “Brainstorm” piece. Between that piece, today’s screed, and today’s “Commentary” piece (“The Chimera of College Brands”), Carey has made it clear that he dislikes Harvard, above all for its hypocrisy. So it comes down to one of two options: either Harvard capitulates, such action to include a set of disclaimers as long as the Harvard College catalog, or Carey gets over his resentment. Get over it, Kevin. Harvard is not perfect, but neither is any other university.

weinberger3 - June 10, 2010 at 11:16 am

I should declare an interest, having taught in Harvard Summer School and still teaching in its termtime sister school, Harvard Extension School (siblings turn over by season). Dean Pfister has, i think, deflated all of Kevin Carey’s concerns except the larger, more general issue stated at the end:”Discriminating against a widely used method of teaching based solely on the mode of delivery irrespective of the course content, curriculum, instructor, assessment standards, etc. strikes me as a remarkably retrograde approach to higher learning for a major research university in 2010.”Let’s set aside using a highly-charged verb like ‘discriminating,’ as if a ‘method of teaching’ were dark-skinned or something. *What on earth* makes anyone think online courses are anywhere near as good as regular classroom learning?! The premise of liberal arts education is a kind of dialogue or conversation that takes place in a room, among people visible and audible to each other. You will never convince me that learning on one’s own, on-screen only, is nearly equivalent. One accepts that we may need online courses and online programs for certain kinds of students, which is not to say that Harvard or its peer institutions need follow this still new, still mostly untested development. Eric Weinberger

erikjensen - June 10, 2010 at 5:26 pm

Donald Pfister is almost certainly incorrect when he claims “no online credit from any institution can be used toward graduation.” Many institutions, including mine, do not make a distinction between online and campus-based courses on transcripts. How does Harvard discriminate?Eric Weinberger wonders “what on earth makes anyone think online courses are anywhere near as good as regular classroom learning?!” It took me all of 5 seconds to find an enormous meta-analysis from the US Department of Education which vindicates online learning. It takes willful ignorance to “discriminate” here, and yes, that is the correct term.http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf

haohtt - June 10, 2010 at 11:58 pm

With all due respect for Mr. Weinburger, to characterize distance learning as “learning on one’s own, on-screen only” and “untested” demonstrates an embarrassing quantity of ignorance. “What on earth* makes anyone think online courses are anywhere near as good as regular classroom learning?!” Only 80+ years of research studies showing no significant differece in learning outcomes between “traditional” and “technology-delivered instruction”. Only the fact that NO body of consistent data exists that demonstrates the inferiority of distance learning. Of course, when one walks around, looking at the world in a skewed way through ivy-colored sunglasses, as Harvard does, then pesky things like research and data pale in comparison to snobbery and opinion. Mr. Pfister’s letter is disingenuous, as Harvard’s Summer School website FAQ states: “Do students earn academic credit for distance education courses? Students taking courses via distance education choose a credit status, earn academic credit, and are graded in the same way as students attending on-campus.” No mention that Harvard has given its own online courses a vote of “no confidence”. To use Mr. Weinberger’s vernacular, “Why in the world” would anyone want to take courses that the institution has deemed substandard? Fortunately, Harvard has the luxury of being able to maintain ignorance, hypocrisy and snobbery behind those ivy-colored glasses.

haohtt - June 10, 2010 at 11:58 pm

sorry for the typos.

jpredington - June 11, 2010 at 1:12 am

AACRAO’s guidance on transcript best practices specifically discourages the communication of the method of delivery on the transcript. I imagine the only way they can scrutinize external courses in the manner described is for their own students seeking pre-approval, unless their volume of transfer applicants is so low that their admissions area is scrutinizing every syllabus for every course to determine methody of delivery, which seems unlikely. This entire conversation also provides more fuel to the federal gov’t fire (re: Sen. Tom Harkins’ continued efforts to require all institutions receiving federal funds to accept all transfer credit from all other institutions), particularly in light of new guidelines that require full publication of transfer credit guidelines, and new regional accrediting requirements (at least for the Middle States region) that require institutions’ CEO’s to sign off specifically on their compliance with all federal guidelines, particularly those in regard to transfer policies.

intered - June 11, 2010 at 1:41 am

Mr. Weinberger makes a strong case for his opposition, so much so that might have thought him a poorly constructed straw man. Is it not intellectual treason to make one’s living as a scholar and thinker yet be so profoundly ignorant of the venues of the industry? Separately, the “no significant difference” finding is a generalization. Well executed online education produces superior learning experiences and outcomes in some important dimensions. The number of areas in which it tends to produce inferior results has steadily diminished as we gain experience.

scott_wedman - June 11, 2010 at 8:41 am

Why are you picking on Harvard? Your undergraduate institution, Binghamton, does the same thing. Binghamton has a summer program for non-traditional university students (high school, extension, etc.) as well. You can read about it here: http://www2.binghamton.edu/continuing-education/credit-programs/summer-session/admission.html.Additionally, the following schools, for example, also engage in the same practice:Oxford (thus showing that #13 was completely wrong when he said Oxford wouldn’t do this): http://summerschool.conted.ox.ac.uk/Yale: http://www.yale.edu/summer/USC: http://cesp.usc.edu/2010/summer/summer.shtmlRice: http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~edsumsch/And many others. Why do you care so much about Harvard? Can you please lay out your prior interactions/assumptions about Harvard, since it seems like you have a horse in the race, so to speak.

skocpol - June 12, 2010 at 3:03 pm

Perhaps the true Harvard value-added has as much to do with personal networking among highly selective admitees, as it has to do with the educations that they receive. In the former dimension, on-line courses are deficient. [I'm at BU, not Harvard. Don't blame my wife for this post.]