Like many bad parents, I went to the midnight opening of Harry Potter with my family last night. There is something about midnight showings that I find compelling. Perhaps it was a year in high school spent at the Rocky Horror every Friday and Saturday night, but I find going to midnight showings is an important ritual of social solidarity embedded in mass consumption and pop culture. And I am not alone. Harry Potter grossed $24-million last night and the Twilight movie Eclipse grossed a whopping $30-million last June at its midnight showing.
Why are so many of us—seemingly reasonable people—willing to forego a night of sleep and risk our children’s health and grades by making them attend school the next day? Because like all truly sacred rituals, midnight showings re-enchant our everyday lives with the possibility of connection. The audience produces a collective solidarity as a result of the mutual exhaustion and simultaneous exhilaration at being the “first” to see an installment of our most compelling narratives. People show up in character and in pajamas. There are more than a few drunks scattered in any midnight showing and they are far more wont to laugh aloud or whistle or applaud. And as a social ritual Harry Potter VII Part 1 certainly did not disappoint last night.
But the The Deathly Hallows, the book and the movie, disappoints because it is just not as good a story as the previous six installments. Oh I know that the intellectual snobs among you will scoff at my lack of taste. ”Harry Potter is a terrible story, not one of the most important stories of our time. J.K. Rowling is a mediocre writer because she neither wrote a literary masterpiece nor created a completely different reality (like the Lord of the Rings series did, for instance),” you will say in your intellectually snobbish accent. But I am interested in Harry Potter not as literature, but as narrative and as narrative the series works perfectly.
First and foremost, Harry Potter works because it is neither here in the muggle world nor there in the wizarding world. It is the very liminality of Potter’s world, the mundane difficulties of living in a completely dysfunctional family that locks you in a closet with the more spectacular difficulties of learning to be a wizard that marks the series as a sacred text. Liminality is always that state which moves us from here to there, earth to heaven. Think of the excitement after Thanksgiving, but before Christmas, as our lives are electrified with the possibilities to come. Think of the engagement period of a couple who are in a constant state of excitement as the “big day” approaches. Neither Christmas nor a marriage are ever as exciting as the days leading up to them.
But this is the problem with the last book in the Harry Potter series. It leaves us not with liminality, not with possibility, but with certainty. (Warning- spoiler alert.) At the end of her remarkable series, J.K. Rowling ties up all the possibilities of the major characters’ young lives into the knot of marriage. Every one of the major characters who begins as a child, grows up into an adult who gets married (to their high school sweethearts, no less). Each of these characters reproduces children and then sends the children off to Hogwarts.
No one spends their twenties having lots of sex with lots of partners like that other sacred text Sex and the City. No one refuses heterosexuality (except poor closeted Dumbledore, who is of course killed in Book VI). No one refuses the certainty of dyadic coupling in lifelong monogamy. So it is that the last part of the Harry Potter series is ruined by a rather mundane view of love and its possibilities. Which is ironic since the whole series begins with Harry being saved from Voldemort’s evil by a mother’s love.
But love is not exciting. Falling in or out of love makes for good stories. The liminality of these states of entering and exiting excites us with possibility and promise. But as Tolstoy told us in Anna Karenina, happy families are all alike; it’s the unhappy ones that have a story to tell. Watching as Ron and Hermione, Harry and Ginny, and all the rest fall deeper into the everyday existence of married, reproductive coupling, the magic gets drained out of a story that up until now was worth staying up all night to see.


15 Responses to Harry Potter’s True Nemesis
ledzep - November 20, 2010 at 2:47 am
“Neither Christmas nor a marriage are ever as exciting as the days leading up to them.”
What a sad thing to think. I couldn’t disagree more.
trendisnotdestiny - November 20, 2010 at 11:04 am
Actually, both Christmas and Marriage are culturally consumed in such ways (traditions) as to make many of its meanings incongruent.
Post-Thanksgiving shopping as a cultural phenomena (maybe instead of taking all those leftovers and sharing them with people who have less)…. $30K weddings for couples who have twice that amount in student loan debt…. Many of our priorities around marriage and Christmas represent the the desired cultural mandate:
Manufacture Emotional Pictures of desired behavior, Emulate the consumptive model and fail to see how the real essence of the meaning of christmas and marriage works in actuality….
ledzep, I wonder if Laurie is more focused on what she sees as the cultural experience not as monolithic “box” experience that all need to check off to agree.
mariadroujkova - November 22, 2010 at 9:22 am
I was rather surprised to learn that showing spouses in love was a strong taboo in America until the 60s http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SleepingSingle
The Addams Family, who are shown in love, are said to be the most psychologically healthy TV family of the time. Ironic.
I find growing and maturing of family love a very interesting story, if it is shown authentically within the setting. In addition to the Addams couple, a good fantastic universe examples are Zoe and Wash in “Firefly.” Statistically, there should be more homosexuals in the “Harry Potter” world than is shown, though.
krichards113 - November 22, 2010 at 9:25 am
I find the biggest letdown of the series comes in the last book/film and anyone who has worked with Campbell’s most unfortunate, formulaic myth-writing guide on the Journey of the Hero may also find that it lacks any surprises. It turns too closely towards the conventions of fantasy myth heroism to provide a plausible end to the series.
anon1972 - November 22, 2010 at 10:52 am
I couldn’t agree more about the ending of Harry Potter. Was it really necessary, not only to seal all the characters in heterosexual matrimony with their childhood sweethearts — suggesting that the wizarding community is suffocatingly narrow, isolated, and incestuous — but to abuse narrative time by “fast-forwarding” a decade or two solely in order to do so? Having spent their teenage years in constant danger and war, the characters are then robbed of their youth and any opportunity to sow the wild oats they’ve saved up, all in the name of foreclosing any narrative possibilities that might take them to anyplace (or anyone) not already encountered in the story of their teenage years. It’s implausible, stifling, and sad.
Thank goodness for fanfic, which happily goes on supplying the rich alternative possibilities JKR felt impelled to foreclose (in fairness, possibly at the urging of an editor) in her stultifying epilogue.
abcde1234 - November 22, 2010 at 1:36 pm
My thoughts on the epilogue are similar to what has been expressed here, though my emotional reaction to it upon reading it was more mixed. Yes, yes, it’s not great literature to skip over the formative 20′s and imagine our 18 year old heroes to have all settled down with each other and reproduce, and send their offspring to their alma matter. I would have been happy had the book ended without bringing us to the happy ever after future, and allowed us to imagine the possibilities. At the same time, there was something so emotionally satisfying (childish and unrealistic,I know) about order being restored in the aftermath of the war to save civilization.
Which made me wonder, whether such such things as rapidly and securely ensconcing oneself in heterosexual monogamy with high school sweethearts might be seen as something of a normal response to seeing your friends and loved ones drop like flies, fighting the bad guys, and successfully restoring the institutions that protected our heroes for the first years of their happy little lives.
And for the record, I’d be willing to bet that Neville and Luna were permitted to experience all kinds of liminality (separately, of course) outside of dyadic coupling in lifelong monogamy.
mhick255 - November 22, 2010 at 4:21 pm
“But as Tolstoy told us in Anna Karenina, happy families are all alike; it’s the unhappy ones that have a story to tell.”
With all due respect to Tolstoy, it’s a helluva first line, but an awful aesthetic principle. Keeping it within the Harry Potter-verse, who would you rather read about – the Weasleys or the Dursleys?
yandoodan - November 22, 2010 at 6:41 pm
Does the author really think that a School Story — the greatest School Story ever written — is a good place to explore the life choices of people in their 20s?
Does the author really want to see adult sexuality explored frankly and intelligently in a book her six year old daughter is going to read?
Does the author really think that she knows more about what JK should write than JK?
Rowling made a conscious, and very intentional, decision to work within a traditional framework. Criticizing this is like blaming someone for not writing sonnets with 15 lines.
amk88 - November 23, 2010 at 9:38 am
I actually really liked the ending. I thought it was comforting that the main characters were able to pick up the pieces of their lives after experiencing such horrible losses and going through so much turmoil in their adolescence and continue on.
As far as having them marry their school sweethearts, I’m not sure I would have wanted to hear that Harry had married some character I had never been introduced to, and the fact that they send their kids to Hogwarts shows that the cycle in life has continued and that Harry could provide for his children what his parents could not: a normal (within the wizarding world), happy childhood.
I stuck with Harry for over ten years and it was nice to have a closing that showed him happy and content with his life.
keis8427 - February 18, 2011 at 10:12 am
Does this really surprise anyone?
tdb489 - February 23, 2011 at 6:29 pm
When teaching at a foreign university, one does not demonstrate or protest regarding American or host country issues. Americans who do so are called “ugly Americans” and taint the reputation of all other Americans. If Libyian or any other foreign students/immigrants wish to demonstrate about their home country problems, I suggest they go home to do so.
raza_khan - March 16, 2011 at 7:39 pm
That has been one of my desires – to learn about Mongolian culture. It is amazing that as large as that country is, how little (if any) I know about that country.
Raza
______________________
Dr. Raza Khan
Oyundelger Nansaljav - March 31, 2011 at 4:15 am
When is the performance?
academicentrepreneur - August 3, 2011 at 10:36 am
OK, now I’m really feeling old even though I’m only in my 50s. When I worked on a student newspaper, we set the type on a linotype and sent photographs to a specialist who etched the image onto a zinc plate using acid and then mounted that plate onto a wooden block. Our 1920s-era Kelly-B press dried the coated paper by shooting it over a gas flame and then squirting it with talcum powder!
I think it’s a great idea that these students get some experience with older technologies. One of the advantages that they held over today’s technologies is that making changes took significant time and effort. That meant that you spent time crafting quality copy the first time and thinking about whether any changes were worth the investment.
cclabstaff - August 31, 2011 at 12:02 pm
I’m fairly certain that Brady Haran is English, not Australian….