• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

An AWP Virgin Speaks Up–Part II

April 14, 2010, 9:53 pm

One of the smartest and most honest things that I heard from any panelist at the AWP Annual Conference last week was from Julie Barer, a literary agent, who said that the best thing anybody could do to get himself or herself published was to go out and buy a book of poems or short stories. 

The very real question she asked was this: “When was the last time you bought a book of poetry or short stories? Everybody’s writing them, but who is buying them?” People looked around the room as if searching for a savior, someone who’d cry out “I’ve purchased a new collection and/or anthology every other day for the past three years and BOY am I HAPPY!” We would have circled that person, bowed, and made wreaths of laurel.

Nobody said anything.

Trying to justify my own existence, I thought, “C’mon! I came home with a couple of short story collections just the other day! And I bought them at full price from my local independent bookseller!” I realized very quickly however, and with cringing humility, that the books I’d bought were Wilderness Tips and The View From Castle Rock, written by Margaret Atwood and Alice Munro respectively, neither of whom are exactly what you’d call “emerging writers.”

That’s when my shame at not having bought a new book by a writer I hadn’t known for 20 years hit me. I realized Barer was dead right to put at least part of the responsibility for the decline in sales of literary titles on those of us who write.

What else do I wish my colleagues — especially the hundreds of very young colleagues — at AWP were able to discuss with more honesty? How about the fact that it would be easier to land a starring role in Cirque du Soleil — one of the ones where you leap to the ceiling from a standing position on your tiptoes, do a triple somersault, and land gracefully balanced on one elbow — than  to get an unsolicited short story or poem into The New Yorker? How about accepting the fact that the odds show we’d have a better chance of making it to the finale of Dancing With the Stars than of getting even the most tender, early, lovingly penned poetry published in The Paris Review? And everyone, at a very early age, should be informed with as much kindness as possible, that while hand-making your own paper from assorted wildflowers culled from national wildlife and writing your own poetry on it in beautiful calligraphy, sewing the binding with colored silk thread, and selling copies to your family, friends, and members of your writing group is adorable, it probably will not help your chances of getting a deal with a press.

If it were easy, everybody would do it.

Actually, since everybody seems to be doing it, what we need to discuss is what even “counts” as doing it successfully and with significance.

Someone in the audience asked if “there are books that are considered unsuccessful?” Boy, did I want to answer that one. I’ve written several of them, you see. If a trade book doesn’t sell at least 7,500 copies, your trade publisher isn’t going think you’re a success. Publishing is a business that depends on profit. Even not-for-profit publishing companies have to sell books.

It isn’t about being loved. We grow up thinking that the world is going to be one big refrigerator, and our articles, poems, drawings and general musings are going to be placed by fame’s magnet in a prominent position. It’s simply not the case.

So when my wonderful undergraduate and aspiring-writer student Julie asks me the blood-and-guts question about whether I’d rather someone buy my books and never read them or borrow them and read them cover to cover — and although it makes my heart shrivel and screech and I really do know that this isn’t the “correct” answer — I must admit I would choose the former.

I hate myself for it, but there you go. If I want to keep having my books published, I will need to keep making sure my books get sold, and then simply hope that, having made the investment, people will — someday, maybe, just maybe — read them.

 

 

This entry was posted in Books, Reading. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment (8)

8 Responses to An AWP Virgin Speaks Up–Part II

katiebeautifulkatie - April 15, 2010 at 2:07 pm

I’d like to see the answers to an anonymous poll on whether people would rather be read than published if they were forced to make a choice. More would agree with you than they would admit in public, I suspect.

jmg06005 - April 15, 2010 at 2:18 pm

Ginaaaaa (if I may),I know you’re trying to be helpful in airing out all these unpleasant and inconvenient truths about publishing, but good lord! Have a little mercy for the unwashed, unpublished masses. I think you’re more fortunate to have come from the School of Hard Publishing Knocks. At least no one told you from the get-go that you were setting yourself up for failure. You ignored that “truth” and made a truth for yourself. Snaps for you. Sincerely,Too Chicken to Cross Swords with the Powers That Be.

literarytype - April 15, 2010 at 6:26 pm

Chicken Little, you are seeing CAUTION signs as FAILURE signs. They are not the same.

dank48 - April 16, 2010 at 8:43 am

Having been on the student side of a writing course or two back when we used inkhorns, and after a third of a century in the book biz, I’d like to see prominently posted in every creative-writing classroom the quotation from Don Marquis: “Publishing a volume of poetry is like dropping a rose petal into the Grand Canyon and waiting for the echo.”This article hits the dead center of the bull’s-eye: too many of us expect others to want what we ourselves don’t. I’ll never understand why people who don’t read, much less buy, books want to write them. Why does someone who spells the word “manusript” want to be a big-time arthur? But about buying but not reading versus reading but not buying: many, many books make it, if just barely, on library sales. Tax-supported public libraries do a lot more for readers and writers than many people realize. Borders won’t let you take it how for a few weeks and then bring it back, read or unread, at no cost. Not a bad thing to think about the day after April 15.

dank48 - April 16, 2010 at 8:44 am

“. . . take it home . . .”Sorry.

tmorrissey - April 16, 2010 at 12:23 pm

I think Gina makes some great points, and what I’m about to write is only tangently related (so apologies), but I just recently purchased some older lit journals for some research I’m doing (e.g., The Iowa Review, TriQuarterly, Salmagundi, from about 1972 to 1982), and I was surprised that their cover/subscription prices were virtually the same as they are now (let’s say, $9 for a single issue). Yet $9 must have represented a larger piece of someone’s bugdet in, say, 1974 than it does in 2010 — think about how much homes and cars, etc., have gone up in the last 30 years. So I’m not sure what to make of this fact. Were such journals deemed more valuable by the previous generation and could therefore demand a higher price? If anyone has a handle on inflation rates, I’d be curious to know how much a literary journal would need to charge today to be equivalent to what $9 represented in the mid Seventies.

tmorrissey - April 16, 2010 at 2:30 pm

Found an inflation calculator online — http://www.westegg.com/inflation/ — that indicates a $9 lit journal in 1975 ought to cost more than $35 today, and by the same token, a journal that costs $9 today should’ve only cost a bit over $2 in 1975. Having edited a couple of lit journals in recent years, I know that it’s difficult to “move product” at $9 or so an issue; charging $35 would be a tough sell indeed.

literarytype - April 18, 2010 at 12:48 am

Who’s reading anything we write anyhow?