• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Monday’s Poem: ‘Yizker Bukh,’ by Erika Meitner

March 27, 2011, 2:04 pm

Memory is
flotsam (yes) just
below the surface
an eternal city
a heap of rubble
debris smaller
than your fist
an animal with-
out a leash
organized wreck-
age ghost net

or one hanging
silence on the phone—
she’s gone
, my sister said,
and we wept and wept
over my grandmother
while my sister sat
with her body and me
in the static and the rabbi
they sent told her to recite psalms
as comfort so we listened to each other
breathe instead and her breath was
a tunnel a handful of pebbles a knotted
Chinese jump-rope       her breath was the coiled
terrycloth turban our grandmother wore when she cooked
or walked the shallow end of her condo pool for exercise—
our grandmother still somewhere in her white turban sewing
Cornish game hens together with needle and string or
somewhere in her good wig playing poker or
somewhere in her easy chair watching CNN
while cookies shaped like our initials bake
in her oven O memory how much you
erased how many holes               we punched
in your facts since who knows the stories
she never told about the camps there are
no marked graves just too much food on
holidays diabetes my mother’s fear
of ships and the motion of some
suspension bridges O memory
you’ve left us trauma below
the surface and some above
like the fact that I can’t
shake the December
my sister’s red hair
caught fire from
leaning too close
to the menorah’s
candles, our
grandmother
putting her
out with a
dish towel
with her
strong
arms.

© Erika Meitner.  Printed by permission of the author.

Erika Meitner is the author of Inventory at the All-Night Drugstore (Anhinga Press, 2003) and Ideal Cities (Harper Perennial, 2010), which was a 2009 National Poetry Series winner. Her third collection, Makeshift Instructions for Vigilant Girls, has just appeared from Anhinga Press. She is currently an assistant professor of English at Virginia Tech where she teaches in the MFA program. She maintains a website at www.erikameitner.com.

Arts & Academe’s poetry editor, Lisa Russ Spaar, notes: Memory is serious business. I mean that quite literally. A recent Internet search on the topic showed an array of purchasable self-help books offering aging baby boomers the chance to ward off dementia through an arsenal of techniques and suggestions—Sudoku, crossword puzzles, games, physical exercise, and, interestingly, memorizing poetry.  Far more hits, too, for sites selling RAM and other “memory suppliers” for our laptops and handheld devices than for meditations on Mnemosyne, ancient mother of the muses. On a very basic level, too, our ability to register, store, and recollect sensory and other information enables us to survive.  Without memory, we would be unable to use language or ponder important abstractions like love, responsibility, God, or time. Or memory itself.

At one end of the spectrum, then, a functioning memory allows us to recall where we parked our car in the morning; at the other end it helps to create and preserve for us a sense of possessing a discreet identity, of being a coherent self at all, a person with a past, a family, a job, a car, to which we must find the stowed-away keys so that we can locate that vehicle and drive it back to a recognizable home when day is done.

It has been especially important for challenged or destroyed communities to create written records of their histories—to preserve their character and dignity, to save them from the ravages of cultural amnesia. Erika Meitner’s “Yizker Bukh” (“memorial book”) refers to one particular genre of totemic memory-keeping. Yizker books, collective memorials to shtetls destroyed by the Holocaust, are usually assembled by survivors and family of survivors.  Part description, part history, they often include biographies of prominent citizens and lists of those who perished in the camps, as well as photographs and other ephemera.

Yizker (or Yizkor), which means “remembrance” / “remember” in Hebrew, is also Judaism’s memorial prayer for the departed, recited in synagogue four times a year. Like that prayer, Meitner’s poem begins with the word “memory,” and her poem, a lament for a deceased grandmother, is also a meditation on memory and what it can and cannot accomplish. In fact the poem opens with an invocatory, figurative “definition” that speaks to the obliteration and preservation that acts of remembering entail:

Memory is
flotsam (yes) just
below the surface
an eternal city
a heap of rubble
debris smaller
than your fist
an animal with-
out a leash
organized wreck-
age ghost net

Just as the speaker’s evocation of the wildness of memory, its ghosts, its “organized wreckage” intensifies as perception and as language into disorganized syntax, we have a stanza break, and the poem moves into its emotional setting: the speaker crying on the telephone with her sister, the latter of whom is sitting with the dead grandmother’s body. In their grief, the sisters listen through the phone lines to each other’s breathing, and the speaker’s sister’s breath becomes “a tunnel a handful of pebbles a knotted / Chinese jump-rope,” triggering a litany, a flood of recollected moments and details from the speaker’s life with her grandmother. The poem swells with these quotidian reminiscences—the terrycloth turban grandmother wore for cooking, the way she sewed game hens together, the wig she wore for poker games—mnemonic fragments that help to organize the  “wreckage” of the speaker’s grief.

But when the speaker recalls her grandmother “somewhere in her easy chair watching CNN / while cookies shaped like our initials bake / in her oven,” something about the conflation of language (the letters) and the oven causes the speaker to swerve. Mid-line she abruptly apostrophizes Memory:  (“. . . in her oven O memory how much you / erased how many holes         we punched / in your facts since who knows the stories / she never told about the camps”), and we realize that this departed loved one was also a survivor of the camps, leaving behind not only memories of an abundant spirit, but a legacy of caesura, contraction (there are “no marked graves”), and trauma.

At this point, the lines shorten again and the poem funnels back toward the left margin as the speaker, momentarily disrupted within her prayer by fresh awareness of all she doesn’t know, and therefore can’t remember (“O memory / you’ve left us trauma below / the surface and some above”), takes us through a passage of seemingly random recollections (“too much food on / holidays diabetes my mother’s fear / of ships and the motion of some / suspension bridges”).  Interestingly, the ghost of the Yizker prayer, with its shorter beginning and ending lines and its rich, longer-lined mid-section, haunts Meitner’s poem (though of course the Hebrew reads right to left from a flush right margin). Looked at from bottom to top, the poem resembles the shape of a smoking fire and evokes the image that concludes the poem, an indelible recollection that returns the narrator to herself and to the occasion:

I can’t
shake the December
my sister’s red hair
caught fire from
leaning too close
to the menorah’s
candles, our
grandmother
putting her
out with a
dish towel
with her
strong
arms.

Memory, Meitner shows us, is serious business, vexed, fictive, and italicized by projection, fear, desire. It has the power to deeply console and to deeply hurt. Experts tell us that we can only store so many memories; to make room for new ones, we must sometimes let others go. As the poem closes on its knife point of loss, its mouthful of ash (its “heap of rubble debris smaller / than your fist”), it is the grandmother’s stacked “strong / arms” we most feel, allowing the speaker—who has made, through the poem, her memorial—to lay aside incendiary anguish even as the commemorative flame of witness, testimony, history, survival, and love endures.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • jplampin

    What about it’s rating (or lack thereof) for earthquakes?

  • opendna

    Stock shipping containers have a max gross weight of 24,000 kg and are designed to be stay in place even at 30-degree angles. If a ship is weighted improperly then it might snap back from wave too fast and cause stacks of containers keeling over. It’s pretty rare that a stack of containers actually falls over, but even then: they’ve got a few million kg of momentum, which you’ll never see in a dorm.

    These buildings usually require fresh study by zoning authorities, because they’re completely different from traditional structures. Southern California architect Peter DeMaria got his work approved in Redondo Beach, CA (high earthquake risk) and it won an award from the American Institute of Architects. For the 2010 Olympics, the city of Whister (another high risk community) used containers for workforce housing. I’m not finding a whole lot from earthquake zones (usually UK or Germany), but those two examples suggest that the idea isn’t totally irresponsible.

    Personally, I’d feel safer in a building made of steel shipping containers than any steel-reinforced concrete/masonry structure.

  • 22108469

    I didn’t think that area had much in the way of seismic activity (?)

  • tee_bee

    Apparently, the seismic hazard is moderate, not severe. http://www.ga.gov.au/image_cache/GA11006.pdf

    I doubt there’s be enough lateral acceleration to topple these, and my sense is that the structure is tied together via the stairwells, and other parts of the structure that aren’t made of “containers.”

    What’s disappointing about this headline is that I thought they were really recycling the actual containers themselves, in some way. There are an awful lot of these empty containers around the world, constituting a lot of steel and other resources. But it appears that the ANU folks factored in all the inputs before reaching their solution. So this is pretty cool.

  • sarasansh

    I thought that was the case as well,a great way to recycle.

  • sullivab

    I don’t know: tell a bunch of testosterone- & beer-addled 19-year-olds that there is no way that they can tip these things over, and they will undoubtedly rise to the challenge. Seriously though, this is a pretty clever idea. Bravo to ANU, Hutchinson Builders, and their Chinese partners for developing this “inside the box” (so to speak) solution.

  • tdb489

    I’ve seen this in South Africa though the containers are not stacked, they are used as individual houses. They are insufferably hot in the summer and cold in the winter regardless of ventilation. It is semi-suitable for people who earn less than $5.00 per day. It is despicable that HDCs can no longer afford traditional housing. I called the international faculty housing in South Korea a shanty house for immigrants. I will NEVER endure such indignities again.

  • beverlypwood

    Glad to see they have drainage and “flashing”, is that peculiar to Australian students? Hope they will stand the test of time, they do not look very stable or ready for longevity.

  • chemteach

    Some of the comments here indicate that the readers did not understand these are not the standard shipping containers. Rather, the company who produces shipping containers in China, was asked to make these containers to order.

  • peggy875

    Harkin is on a “witch hunt” as we all know. If you want to take a true look, then look at all of higher education – public, private, for-profit, non-profit. I would hardly consider Harkin’s website as a reliable source – it is very slanted. I have worked in both the for-profit and public sector. Believe me, the public sector needs a long hard look as well.

  • carburke

    I agree with the info you are blogging about. So many for profit colleges are a weak link in the higher education world; they have mostly become an assembly line : for the student who needs skills & the “company” who takes our tax dollars!

  • drj50

    There are many well-documented problems with for-profit institutions of higher education — as well as (different problems) with private and public non-profit institutions. But “Next: anecdotes about administrators and then about students.”? Good data, not anecdotes, lead to good policy.

  • 11274135

    It’s interesting how defenders of the malfeasance of some in the for profit sector prpose as their defense that the “non-profits do it too.” And that makes it right?

    Tell you what. Let’s imagine the world without Pell grants. How many for profits would disappear?

  • Prof_truthteller

    Alan, you state, “Many years of Presidential Budget Data show clearly that the government has been profiting for years on defaulted loans, getting back $1.22 for every dollar they pay out on defaulted FFELP loans,” and so I am just wondering where the 22 cents comes from. Thanks.

  • Prof_truthteller

    Here’s the cycle: states cut education budgets while both state and federal agencies increase scrutiny, accountability, and reporting requirements, many of which require faculty or teacher involvement. Teachers then have less time to prep and teach, and less choice in what to teach and how to teach it, but still have the same teaching load, or an increased load in increased class sizes. Administrators have few options other than to increase class sizes, spend less on operations, (think dirtier bathrooms, more dangerous walkways, older computers) cut part timers and shift their load to full timers.

    Non-profit colleges fight over international students while leaving locals in the lurch, cancel expensive programs like nursing, abandoning their core mission. Public colleges desperately pursure “venture philanthropy” funds, which require another “mission shift” towards what the grantor demands. Further cuts leave only the option to cut the number of classes offered, and turn away new admits, creating a huge unmet need in the hundreds of thousands of students nationwide. These millions are driven to the for-profit sector, who can then claim their righteousness in fulfilling that unmet need, all the while funneling double digit profits to shareholders, who couldn’t care less about educational quality. These millions of poorly educated, poorly trained, poorly prepared students are dumped on the weak labor market. Increased unemployment only increases the demand for educationa and training.

    Tell me how this situation is not a bad thing, and that investigation, oversight, regulation, or restraint of some kind is somehow, unnecessary, or even as some trolls on this blog claim, a bad and evil thing itself.

    It’s a perfect opportunity for the for-profits to decimate their primary market competitors, which are public colleges and universities, and, as big corporations, right now they would be really stupid not to go in for the kill.

  • Prof_truthteller

    A “witch-hunt” is not a bad thing if there really are witches that curse and harm and maybe even kill people.

    Deflecting the scrutiny on for-profits over to public sector colleges is a manipulative strategy, not a valid argument against that scrutiny happening. Like a child with cooke crumbs all over his face and shirt pointing to his brother, “he ate some, too”

  • Prof_truthteller

    In addition, while I see the argument that “for-profits = evil” presented here by Donoghue, I don’t see where he is engaged in the counter you claim, of “non-profits = good” and in fact, I have been following and commenting on many articles and blogs here on that topic and have yet to see anyone actually present that simplistic argument at all, other than by a few ignorant trolls.

    It is possible “for-profits = evil” with or without any connection to the goodness or evilness of for-profits.Their evilness is inherent and not dependent on any other condition or entity.

    I personally think comparisons of the two are unhelpful and distracting. It’s like asking “how is a raven like a writing desk?” – they don’t relate and the comparison tells us nothing about either.

  • djacobs12

    They have been using shipping containers in vancouver as low cost housing for at least a year, and I believe in london as well, so maybe this can help meet student housing demand and drive costs down too.

  • stevesarakuhn

    Thank you, Mr. Jenkins, for your clear argument for tenure in community colleges.  As one of two community college professors who were banished to a very small, remote site because we insisted on faculty control over curriculum (in our case, it was a private sector company who was invited in and was using materials and methods that were at best, unproven, and at worst, proven to be bad), I can attest to the importance of tenure.  I know that we would have been fired  if we had not had this protection.  As it was, we were mistreated for a couple of years until our lawsuit was settled, and then we were returned to the main campus with some additional benefits.  In my experience, faculty members at community colleges tend to be passive about speaking out under the best of circumstances, though they will state quite cogent arguments and possible solutions to each other privately about problems facing the institution.  Even with the collective voice of a Faculty Senate (my colleague and I were secretary and president of the Senate the year immediately prior to our punishment), faculty members rarely speak out, and, if they do, it is anonymously.  Without tenure and its protections, the community college can become a fiefdom of the president.

  • wilkenslibrary

    I was disappointed that Rob Jenkins did not cite the AAUP’s position on granting tenure to contingent faculty in this article, so I am pleased that drassessment brought up the need for job security among the 75% of community college faculty who are not tenured or, currently, tenurable.  Our position is, as our Mexican colleagues put it, much more precarious even than that of full-timers.  Since our students’ learning conditions depend on the working conditions of their teachers, we must insure that those working conditions are excellent.  Contingent faculty need a pathway to full-time employment and a system that guarantees them the right to speak out on all college-related issues.

    Betsy Smith/Adjunct Professor of ESL/Cape Cod Community College

  • robjenkins

    Honestly, Betsy, I had thought of adjuncts and their plight as a separate issue; but from what you and drassessment have said, I see that it’s not as separate as I thought. A case of unconscious parochialism on my part, no doubt. Mea culpa. Thanks to you both, though, for addressing the issue more eloquently than I could.

    Rob

  • wilkenslibrary

    Dear Rob,

    It’s a separate but closely related issue.  Or maybe intertwined is a better description.  Thank you for being open to considering it as such.  The AAUP has come out for tenure for contingent faculty, and I’m hopeful that before I’m ready to retire, we’ll see the Vancouver model in effect on many, if not all, of our campuses since it will benefit not only part-timers, but also full-timers, and, most of all, students.

    In solidarity,
    Betsy 

  • polisciguy

    I teach politics part-time and my students cannot pin down my personal beliefs because I really do argue as many sides of an issue as I can. When I eventually achieve F/T status at a community college, tenure will be vital to the way I do my job. In addition to having collective control regarding issues such as curriculum delivery methods, I all too often have to present ideas that are controversial to some or even a majority of people in order that I fairly represent the broad spectrum of opinions in the public arena. If that freedom is sacrificed because I feel the need to bow at the altar of playing it safe, then I have done a disservice to my students and my discipline.

  • nampman

    Amen!

  • softshellcrab

    I don’t see the fear point.   I see so much abuse of tenure at my school, that I have come (as a fully tenured faculty member) to disagree with it, or ask what modified approach can protect faculty from being let go for controversial ideas, such as conservative right-wing ones like mine, but allow them to be let go for being lazy.  I can’t tell you how lazy and good-for-nothing half of the tenured faculty in my department are.   Heck, I wish they had the gumption to express some controversial thought I disagreed with, it would show they had some life in them.  I would respect them more.  We have a bunch of highly paid tenured faculty working 10-15 hours a week, and not working at all over most of the Summer or over a one-month Christmas break.   The tenure thing is so abused.  And why protect faculty in a way that no other workers are protected?  I am just turned off by the whole thing and the ridiculous abuse I see.

  • Prof_truthteller

    Here is the link to Rob’s article that he cites below; http://chronicle.com/article/Tenurethe-Two-Year/44474/ took me awhile to find it so I offer it here for everybody.

    neudy, thanks for clarifying your main point for me. However, even if we replace “administrators” with “legislators” as the body capable of implementing the change we are discussing- removal of tenure from CC faculty- I am not sure that your suggestion would help, and here’s why.

    The legislators who are seeking to remove tenure from community college faculty are for the most part Republicans and conservatives. I personally do not think that their reasons are based on any fears. In fact, it’s not clear to me WHAT their reasons are- however, if you look at the overall scope of the Republican party’s actions, one unifying trend that seems quite clear is how those actions serve to undercut traditional Democratic and liberal power bases and funding. Organized labor is clearly one of their targets. Academe is another. Removing tenure kills both birds with one stone.

    The CCs are an easy target and starting point, partly because of the apathy of CC faculty towards tenure that Rob describes, but I have no doubt the campaign against tenure will spread to four year and doctoral institutions.

    Unfortunately, in our public arena of political discourse, my fear is that we have moved far beyond any hope for an “amicable solution to meeting both party’s needs” mostly due to the ideological intransigence of the right and far right, and this issue is just one small piece of that hugely threatening national problem.

  • coco_rico

    If the candidate were applying for a job as a professor, her decision to rearrange the chairs would have been bold and probably appropriate. Personally, however, I want deans and chairs and provosts, etc., to take charge and give us direction. If your leaders are making up the rules as they go along, very bad things can happen. Candidate 3 would be good as a team-teacher or maybe to operate a tutoring program on campus, but not to make executive decisions.

    Regarding gender, I must say I have 25 years in the working world, of which 13 years have been spent in higher education–and I can’t say women manage that much differently from men. I work with two female deans at my university: One works by consensus and always sees every issue as a case of compromise. The other is a “bulldog,” often criticized by people for being crude and insensitive. I love the bulldog lady.

    I also work with the grants office a lot, which has mostly female grants officers. One is very sweet and gentle. Another one I nicknamed “Thunderbolt” because she has the thunderbolt stare that stops people dead in their tracks. I like working with Thunderbolt.

    In my own department, I have found that female colleagues tend not to be very nurturing but they stand up for me when a clear ethical stake is on the table. I respect them immensely, to the last one. I haven’t had a single female colleague at this university who gossips or backstabs or does any of the stereotypical “girl” things.

    My straight male colleagues present quite a different range, however. Four of them were very nurturing when I came back from active duty and struggled with post-deployment mental-health issues. They were kind and patient, willing to listen to me break down and even cry in front of them. Even though I am bisexual, I think they connected with me because I am married and a dad and served my country, so they could relate to the typical male stress of my experience.

    Other straight men have been horrendous at places where I have worked, acting like little b*tches and going behind my back, forwarding emails and creating public pressure to force me out of this job or get me blocked on that grant. 

    And then there are lesbians. I always, always, always get along with lesbians with one or two exceptions. They’re the most awesome people to have as colleagues or supervisors.

    So I can’t really generalize about male/female leadership styles at all. Times have changed and I think those characterizations are passé. Candidate 3 in the scenario above is not indicative of the way “girls” or women lead things, from what I have seen. She is simply not the right person for an executive job. Maybe she could teach research classes at the library or do group therapy.

  • nacrandell

    Cadidate #3 actions suggest she is forcing the issue and making people uncomforable which will not build consensus.  She is not acting like a “girl”, just a stereotypical business school/six sigma graduate – all buzz words and no leadership abilities.

  • richardtaborgreene

    On the one hand:

    1) people might have gotten bored sitting so a bit of movement might refresh
    2) touchy feeling facilitators are among the most demanding dictators in life–throw her in the trash
    3) asking 50 people to change ANYTHING is a good beginning—garlands around her neck
    4) apparently brain contents were irrelevant—shoot all 50 faculty
    5) why not chairs that roll?—-shoot the facilities people
    6) hand out sheet with what leaders look like and give each candidate 5 minutes to strut and fret
    7) March–real leaders take credit for luck and avoid credit for bad luck—check her ability to do that
    8) Have a man and her run races, lift weights, spit, and make vulgar jokes—then choose the best
    9) have her and a man fight using neutral tools—racoons, espressos, 
    10) give em both a stack of abstracts in their field and challenge them to stay awake for 5+ minutes.

    On the other hand:

    Whomever you hire will have zero money the next 20 years—so it hardly matters, hire anyone. 
    if you are in great warm city with great coffees and conversations and lots of high tech firms near the ocean and are paying 300K or more a year—hire me. 

    GREAT LEADERS, truth be told, do not LOOK like ANYTHING—
    they can be very very unimpressive people–their RESULTS look impressive, not them—
    research shows interviews are the LEAST RELIABLE hiring criterion—people who are fascinated with winning interviews are stupid (candidates and deciders both).

    More seriously–since LOTS of research finds executives have NO MEASURABLE EFFECTS except in crisis situations where confounding factors abound, hire someone it is entertaining to watch the ups and downs of—someone who enjoys the flows of life instead of taking it out on the poor staff, organization, students, faculty, or other stakeholders. People who treat the interview as a joke can turn out to be pretty accurate and good readers of faculty. ooooo that was subtle…..

  • lindarabbit

    I have no doubt that SOME people are holding on to old models of leadership.  Hiring decisions, (like other decisions that humans make – according to a vast research literature in the disciplines of psychology and economics for example - are a function of ‘gut’ (read: emotions that are operating at an unconscious level).  The unconscious archetype of a “warrior” or “god” could have been operating in the decision making of the search committee in the article.   Perhaps, however, a more prosaic explanation is in order for the behavior of that committee: organizational fit.  Without followers, there is NO LEADERSHIP.   Perhaps this group of faculty members would not be able to follow a leader who broke basic, normative interview rules!  In their collective ‘gut,’ Candidate No. 3 scared them away.

  • weberatou

    The observation fails to take note of the fact that, in addition to the third candidate proceeding in an unusual manner, she was the only female.  Is it possible that the “acting like a girl” comment tells us more than was intended?

  • 5768

    Imaginary, symbolic, real. Three registers upon which we operate but the imaginary of the ‘look’ seduces us best.

  • http://twitter.com/identifytalent Janet Korpi

    As a leader it’s important that you engage your audience and while Candidate No. 3 did it overtly, I’m left wondering if the other candidates did it as well, perhaps with humor? It seems like the article is trying to portray a difference between male and female leadership.  Our experience, excellent leaders come in all shapes and sizes…and they always engage the group.

  • dlsgphd

    True leadership is not about the position we hold, but the influence we wield.  When selecting for leadership position, we must consistently look at the influence the candidate imparts to us in the short time that they are with us. The method that a candidate uses to present is far less important than the leadership influence they exude.   We must always ask ourselves, is this a person that I want to follow?  If not, move on to the next candidate. 

  • raza_khan

    I have a fundamental issue with the title of the article -  “What does a Leader Look Like?”

    I am rather concerned with What does a Leader Act Like and How the Leader Gets the Job Done?

    To me, it is not about gender issue – it is simply about getting the job done without losing respect of the colleagues / employees and on the same hand be professional in the conduct.

    Of course,  people have different views on how a prospective leader should / needs to act… but I rather am more interested in the answer “Why Should We Hire You?”  and “Tell Us Few Things That would be a Disadvantage to This Position”.

    Heck,  I ask the same questions in my students’ mock interviews!!!!!!

    Finally, for those of you who are stuck,  get over the gender issue…. Hopefully, the upcoming Generation Y does not care if their leader is a male or a female.

    Raza
    ______________________
    Raza Khan, Ph.D.
    Dr.Raza.Khan@gmail.com

  • msghighered

    That is just plain stupid. Know your audience! And lastly, people work very hard for a phd and she may have offended others in the audience that had one which I am sure was most of them!

  • rheinland

    That may very well be the case. Conversely though the female professional is often criticized as being too “business like” or demonstrating “corporate mentaility” if she is too assertive (speaking from personal experience). 

  • fiona

    I don’t get what this is about. Staying or going where? Who is this about? If this is for humanities Ph.Ds, not staying somewhere often means the end of a career. This entry seems half-written.

  • bigtwin

    yeah, you left out a little thing in this post – the subject.

  • mwilsonk

    This must be about staff or administrators.  Faculty who leave almost never “come back.”  I know of exactly one person in my discipline who returned to a previous institution where she had been tenured before her departure.  

    And beloved dentists?  I know of people who miss particular restaurants, but (with apologies to dentists) I’ve never heard of anyone who missed their dentist.

  • raza_khan

    I agre with mwilsonk.   Faculty who have left rarely come back… there are those rare expceptions.

    Having taught in more than 4 different colleges (with three as full-time),  the day I do not feel good going to work to enjoy what I will do as a faculty , that is the first day I start seriously think of moving…  My take is simple…. I gotta love work enough that I am willing to be on campus half an hour every single day before I have any scheduled committments.

    Raza
    ____________________
    Raza Khan, Ph.D.
    Dr.Raza.Khan@gmail.com

  • mnprof

    From the information on the sidebar, the author is vice president for human resources at the University of Arizona…

    Leave it to an upper-level administrator to be verbose AND vague… (just me being snarky, of course)

  • david_brown

    I’ve heard of few endowed-chair faculty leaving and returning, but never for any faculty at a less accomplished level. I’m sure it must happen from time to time, but is exceedingly rare.

  • nyhist

    in one case I am familiar with, a senior faculty member moved to a new place, soon regretted it, asked to come back, and was refused because his original institution had tired of his repeated searches for other jobs while on its payroll. In another case, a  faculty member resigned to take a job with a research institute but two years later, when the original institution had just started to gear up to search for a replacement, asked to come back, and was taken back (the search for a successor was never formally begun). So it does happen for faculty as well as staff, in my experience.

  • elgato1204

    My department loses at least one faculty member every year, and usually more than one, to departments that offer more money or are higher in the pecking order.  I take this as a sign that we’re hiring and supporting really good people.  But it sure is hard to be trying to find first-rate people every year who might be movable, and then actually hiring them, to replace the people who leave.  I agree, however, that they very rarely return.

    As for dentists, if you live in a university town (small) and have kids, then you probably have one you love and will surely miss. 

     

  • richardtaborgreene

    We all imagine, if we stay, that effort or new directions will somehow allow us to continue to learn, change, and grow  in any reasonably decent locale, the web enabling all that now.  HOWEVER, the AMOUNT of learning, changing, and growth done THAT way is approximately 1/100th the AMOUNT done by putting ourselves in new environments where we HAVE to adapt LOTS of ways whether we want to or not of feel good or not or have to time or not or feel competence and prepared or not.  

    So the dream of “I will put down roots here and develop” is not real and does not become real.   We stagnate in familiar environments except for a rare few who develop there DUE TO BAD HORRIBLE CRISES.   If we want to be different than our selves ten years from now, the easiest way is the forced adaptations of a move.   Painful but inescapable growth beats painful and voluntarily self evaded growth.  

    HOWEVER,  exploring who you are, what you can do, what you want, if done by constant change and moves, makes you uinreliable and shallow.   We can safely explore ONLY by exploring via contributions and minimal contributions take about 3 or 4 years in any one place.  Exploring by visiting means never contributing so after 3  or so explorations you have an 8 year patch of nothing done to prove your worth.   

  • totoro

    I also don’t understand this article at all. In response to those who say that faculty never leave and then come back, that isn’t true in my experience. First there are all those who go to work in government etc. for a while and then come back. And I worked at my current university (not in the US from in the late 90s for 5 years and then worked in the US and then I came back here recently and just got an offer of a permanent job). In international moves it is quite common. I also was a VAP at my alma mater (in the US) after doing a post-doc elsewhere. So, I’ve “come back” twice in my career.

  • cwm4c

    “…but two years later, when the original institution had just started to gear up to search for a replacement, asked to come back, and was taken back (the search for a successor was never formally begun).” 

     Funny that this doesn’t strike us as an insane way for an organization to operate.

  • lkaplan

    I this piece is reflective. Thank you for making me think and realize that not one institution can define you and no position can make you stay put.

  • 22108469

    “…and having to wear a coat in the winter makes them even more annoying.”

    Well, OMG, like, wearing a coat is SO geriatric! 

  • jeeb47

    For me, the decision to leave my beloved “home” institution and state was based on my desire to advance to the next level in my administrative career with no place to go at my current, small institution.  At the next institution, I was forced to make a change and move to yet another state and administrative position which, so far, has been a great fit for me.  So while I didn’t really want to leave, circumstances forced me to make change and have new experiences which have enhanced my knowledge of higher education.  I have yet to find a new dentist in my current town, but I’m sure that will work out too!