• Monday, May 28, 2012

Previous

Next

Arts-School Grads: Rich? Don’t Count on It. Content? Quite Possibly!

May 3, 2011, 12:01 am

(Chart courtesy of Snaap)

By Carolyn Mooney

Parents, it’s OK to send your kids to art school!

A national survey of 13,581 arts-school alumni found that almost three-quarters of those who intended to work as a professional artist had done so at some point since graduating, and 90 percent of all respondents rated their educational experience as good or excellent. Even among those not working in the arts, a majority said their arts training was relevant to their work, according to the latest findings from the Strategic National Arts Alumni Project (Snaap).

“That really dispels the common perception that the choice to study the arts in a professional-degree program is a doomed endeavor,” says Douglas Dempster, dean of the College of Fine Arts at the University of Texas at Austin, and a member of Snaap’s advisory board. “Many schools, including ours, haven’t had good data on the professional outcomes of our graduates, and I think many of us feared what we might learn.” But he found many of the statistics, especially those on alumni working in their chosen field, ”surprisingly encouraging.”

While arts graduates aren’t bitter, however, neither are they wealthy—63 percent were self-employed, and 57 percent of current professional artists held two jobs concurrently (and 18 percent held three or more jobs). A significant minority said their institution did not adequately help them acquire financial and business skills needed in their work. That figure suggested a “mismatch” between graduates’ training and work skills, according to the survey report, “Forks in the Road: The Many Paths of Arts Alumni.”
Of those who had stopped working as professional artists, the top reasons cited were: better pay or steadier income; lack of available work (39 percent); and debt, including student loans (25 percent).

Alumni from 154 arts programs took part in the 2010 survey. The latest data set is the largest and most comprehensive yet, and confirms and amplifies findings from two earlier surveys. The online project, intended to provide a national picture of artists’ development, is run by the Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research in collaboration with Vanderbilt University’s Curb Center for Art, Enterprise, and Public Policy. It’s modeled after the National Survey of Student Engagement, which collects data on student involvement in academics and is also run by the Indiana center.
Steven J. Tepper, associate director of the Curb Center, noted that 22 percent of those surveyed never planned to become professional artists, but chose to go to art school anyway. For many, the creativity and skills developed in art school carried over to other professions. “I think it’s interesting how many people working outside the arts are happy they went to arts school and would do it again,” he says. “People who ended up as lawyers were no less happy with their arts training.”

As might be expected, professional artists appreciated the creative opportunities their work offered, but weren’t happy with their salaries. For example, 80 percent of fine artists were “very satisfied” with the opportunity to be creative in their work, while only 8 percent said the same about their income.

That gulf may be impossible to overcome, but Dempster believes the survey data will help art schools adjust their curricula and faculty members adjust their expectations. “Many of our graduates are going on to a great diversity of fields,” he says. “We should be encouraging that as an appropriate and successful and honorable outcome, and not fostering overly narrow expectations about their professional prospects. That will be a revelation for many of our faculty, who tend to measure their success by a very narrow expectation for their students.” The survey data will also help art schools satisfy accreditors’ demands for institutional data and accountability, he says.

After three years of pilot testing, the project is now registering colleges that want to take part in the first national administration of the survey, in the fall. For more details visit the project’s Web site at http://www.snaap.indiana.edu/. Interactive graphics based on the 2010 data will be available at http://www.snaapshot.org/.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • 11119787

    My university participated in the SNAAP survey this year and I recently received our insitutioal report. Personally, I found the quantitly of data overwhelming, yet inconclusive.

  • 11319762

    Art naturally reflects the world and what is important in it. It should not surprise anyone that art students are pleased with their education.

    Our university has a consortium agreement with the arts school nearby and I have had the privilege of teaching a number of the arts students in courses that are leadership/management based. (Many are enrolled in a degree program that allows them to earn a minor in Business Administration as part of their BFA.) The arts students have always brought a fresh perspective to my courses and great sene of who they are and what they want to do.

    These survey results strike me as very much in line with my own experience. They are strong students who have great insights into the world around them.

  • madamedelphine

    In recent years I have read all the publications available from UWS Philosophers and each one has been an intriguing experience.  “The Vocation of Poetry” and “Fatal Numbers,” the particular subjects of the above article, are written/translated with a lucid beauty.  These, and the other books available from UWS Philosophers, are remarkable for the insights they provide, and the ways in which they provoke and entertain the reader.

  • http://www.facebook.com/thomas.mcgonigle Thomas McGonigle

    I discovered this small publishing house a few years ago when they had a table at the small press fair in early December. They had published a book on suffering… I would love to have been able to write about these little books, but like Romano, it seems, we don’t know how to go about describing what these books are about. He printed his inability which takes the form of evasion, I did not print my inability by resorting to the silence of not writing… I do think on the other hand instead of publishing two authors who seem to be popular because of seeming to be both modern and vague, it would have been more interesting if theseublishers having access to the German language should have been publishing the greatest German writer since Goethe, Ernst Junger, whose untranslated books are of much more interest since they arise from Junger’s total engagement with what has created us now in the 21st Century…they should have shaken off the taboo against this essential voice.

  • sand6432

    It might be noted that Alfred and Blanche Knopf did much the same thing about 100 years ago when they imported and translated the works of European philosophers.—Sandy Thatcher

  • davidfalcone

    The story … the numbers don’t really matter but the job when you
    remove the numbers becomes harder and people get better and what they
    are doing … is an important one. 

  • pflady

    How do you know whether the “students who didn’t submit test scores” who went on to perform the same at Wake Forest as students who did submit them were all students who performed poorly on the SAT/ACT or who even took the tests?  

  • 11182967

    It’s a little like going clothing optional: you lose the clues that the cover provides, but what you then focus on is a lot more revealing.

  • mbelvadi

    Many people, and unfortunately many school programs, confuse “gifted” with “high achieving”. Unfortunately, due to  a complex mix of factors, many poor minorities who are gifted are also low-achieving (usually called “underachieving” when they’re gifted). If the “gifted” programs are only designed for “gifted high achievers” then the minorities will be left out. It’s ironic, because they are exactly the students who can benefit the most from them, the ones who fail to cope with being ill-challenged in the regular program, as compared with the high achievers, who by definition cope well and just hit the “ceiling” on the regular programs.

  • erichoover

    11144703 – I don’t have a “narrative,” nor did I “erase” anyone. I was just directing readers to an interesting article that has implications for readers in higher education. And it’s true: summaries of articles often don’t cover all the details in nuances contained in those articles.

    Eric Hoover 

  • Guest

    Music teachers are the right kind of gays in the eyes of the mainstream liberal media, so they are allowed to sleep with underaged boys without being demonized. 

  • jffoster

    For the record, you will note I used the pluperfect subjunctive.  I know of no cases where this actually happened in a Music College / Conservatory. Perhaps I should have written “If this were to have happened…..” to make the hypothetical abundantly clear.

  • cwinton

    The decision to play the last 3 games, whatever the motivation, at least fits with how teams that have been placed on probation are treated (although some might argue this case rises to the level of the one at SMU, where the NCAA required the school to shut down its program).  PSU will be bowl eligible, so the real proof in the pudding will be how they handle possible post season games.  To my thinking the school should announce it will not play beyond already scheduled games (which also means they would not contend for the Big 10 championship).  The argument that you would be punishing innocent players doesn’t wash, since infractions by one or more players can lead to the same kind of outcome.  Isn’t that one of the lessons teamwork is supposed to teach?

  • moehnandasc

    Perhaps this might be considered. Play the reaming scheduled games as to cancel them will hurt not only Penn State, but the Universities they are playing. Accept a bowl bid so as not to hurt the players that have worked so hard, but donate all the proceeds from the bowl game to an orginiztion that helps protect and heal victims of this type of abuse.
    Just a thought

  • sand6432

    If the incidents had involved a currently employed coach and been recent events, then cancellation might have been appropriate. But to take such a step in response to an incident involving a nonemployee occurring nearly a decade ago seems extreme. But I do like the idea of donating any bowl game profits PSU makes to child abuse charities (to the extent that Big 10 revenue sharing allows).—Sandy Thatcher

  • victorl

    Penn State is only beginning to learn what the actual “costs” are to arrogance and contempt toward the truly vulnerable.  The students at Penn State who feel they had “nothing to do” with the priority given to sports over other issues are learning that there really is a price to pay for keeping one’s head in the sand (or bleachers, or sky boxes).  Penn State should not just bemoan their fall from grace (if that is how they consider what’s gone on), but reflect on what else might have fallen by the wayside with this coordinated lack of oversight of the university’s athletic program.  If such a horrific and egregious disregard could be sustained for so many years at such an high administrative level by so many, can this truly be the only crime, abuse, etc., that has been brushed aside in the name of leaving the school’s image (and sports profits) untarnished?  An ethical lapse like what’s gone on at Penn State did not emerge from nowhere.  This is a culture of “no-higher-priority” athletic prominence.  I’ll be surprised if it were the only instance we learn about. 

    In part, this ethos gets sustained by pandering to what your “customers” (students) want, rather than what faculty, educators, administrators, etc., must understand a university to be.  They’ve proven that they know how to run Penn State as a business, and can show a profit, and can please their share-holders, advertisers, and sports alumni.  It might be nice if they could come round to a sense of what a non-profit educational organization should be doing, and how this is so very different from big business, or, as we’ve seen, a “winner-take-all” athletics contest.  It will be interesting to follow the trajectory Penn State’s trustees chart as the school moves forward.  Will there be any reprioritization?

  • academicvalues

    FYI Penn State is a fine academic institution.

  • 12080243

    “If the incidents had involved a currently employed coach and been recent events, then cancellation might have been appropriate. But to take such a step in response to an incident involving a nonemployee occurring nearly a decade ago seems extreme…” This quote portrays quite aptly limited sympathy. 

    Sympathy seems appropriate for all those at Penn State except “one individual and the failure of a few others.” Then thoughts occur whether they’re consciously sought. For example, you’ve seen the screaming, enthusiastic crowds at Penn State football games (and at other such events, in other environments, too.) It’s quite overpowering. It’s also quite empowering to Penn State leaders or to other university leaders, too. Now, remember the pictures of the screaming, enthusiastic crowds at Hitler rallies. That thought occurs whether we bid for it consciously or not. They’re facts. Do the screaming, enthusiastic crowds provide license to Hitler, to other tyrants, or to, by comparison the lesser but just as disgusting, criminals at Penn State, or to other amoral leaders at other universities? How do you control this license? How do we control the crowds? And the leaders that feed on them? The crowd can’t walk away as innocents, can they? The crowd is made up of individuals. Are individuals at Penn State innocents? We all contribute to our rah-rah PR deceptions our leaders perpetrate on students and the public. We know that. We professors know that. None of us is ignorant of this reality. But we let it slip by. We, faculty, allow Penn State type leadership, whether it is at Penn State or my school, the University of Southern Mississippi. My guess is that all individuals at Penn State will, directly or indirectly, pay the price for their participation in the child-abuse scandal. Associative guilt? That’s a fact whether you like it or not, or whether I like it or not. The question is are you blameless as a fan of “Joe-pa” sports? If you’re blameless, then stop the mindless crowds and the license they give the Joe-pas around the country. Worry about controlling the license you grant to Joe-pas. It may be your son or daughter or religion that is ————–. You fill in the blank.

    Chauncey M. DePree, Jr., DBA, Professor, School of Accountancy, University of Southern Mississippi and Editor, usmnews