August 28, 2013, 12:35 pm
Football season starts tomorrow! The world is against the Hokies right now but that’s okay. Nineteen-point underdogs? That’s okay too. I’d rather be underestimated….
UGA and Bama both out!
Here are my picks in the office pool. We select winners for all the ACC games. I’m thinking that we should compete in pools with other libraries in our conference—I know we would certainly beat Georgia Tech with Mr. Hines and Mr. Brower playing.
You have to believe in your team. Despite injuries and youthfulness, I’m confident that Mr. Thomas can deliver. In the library we play for pride– and this honorable trophy. Visit my office next year and you’ll see it proudly resting on my desk. go Hokies!
August 26, 2013, 12:22 pm
You’re alone on the ref desk. The shift ends in ten minutes and you have a meeting across campus that you’re expected to lead. Just then—a student approaches and asks “the question.” You know the one I’m talking about— it’s not a known item search, it’s not an instructional “how do I find articles on x” — it’s a complex matter on a subject that you’re not comfortable with. Referral is not an option.
Lauren and I were debating this last week. Which set of information tools or subject/controlled vocabulary is the most intimidating? For me it was chemistry and for her it was legal.
We decided to open it up to you—friendly readers of librarian blogs—tell us, which one gets the nod? Polymers or shepardizing? If you want to suggest something different—go for it. Medical? Financial? Patents? Gov Docs? Physics? We want to hear it and why. Make a case for …
August 21, 2013, 3:43 pm
Yesterday’s post resonated with people. There seems to be a lot of focus on the importance of the “proper” way to do research—and the proper tools. That’s how much of our current value is delivered so I completely understand the concern and passion.
Obviously the case I described is just one example and things may be different for you, but in this instance the interfaces we offer were not effective for simple keyword searching.
Here is an example. Forget about limiters, options, date ranges, licensing, access, etc. I know those are important and distinguishing features, but let’s leave those out of the conversation. Right now I’m interested purely in keyword-based results. Let’s test some algorithms!
Let’s say you’re researching Woodstock and that you need to find articles from the New York Times that were published while the concert what happening. You…
August 20, 2013, 5:56 pm
I had an interesting conversation with a faculty member last week that went something like this: “Brian, I want you to know that it’s getting harder for me to get students to use the library— especially the databases— anything beyond three clicks is just too many.”
In some disciplines this would not really shock me, but it was a historian. This is someone who is passionate about the library. This is someone who advocates for primary resources and through research. This is someone—who from what I can tell—is a very sophisticated database user.
If our super users are frustrated with database interfaces – what does that mean? Many of us spend a lot of time promoting library resources to students, but if faculty stop encouraging (or requiring) usage—what then?
The assignment is actually straightforward. Explore historical events by comparing coverage…
August 13, 2013, 8:52 pm
Lauren and I were recently talking about the evolution of the social web. There had been some press about the kids today don’t use Facebook anymore. The articles use to be about how such-and-such was no longer cool. Now we’re starting to see a generation completely bypassing Facebook. They are not leaving it because they were never on it. Facebook is for grandparents!
So what’s the alternative? What’s next big thing? What’s the Facebook Killer? I’ve been out of the social media scene for a while now, but the shift seems to be away from the single solution and more toward multiple products for different needs. This is why Vine, Instagram, and Tumblr are popular. Each tool focuses on different things (strengthens?) as opposed to trying to do everything like Facebook.
We seem to be entering (or have entered) an era of specialization. The one-stop-shop is emptying…
August 6, 2013, 8:01 pm
One of the things I enjoyed at UCSB was co-leading the common book program. That effort wasn’t just focused on freshmen, but was open to everyone. We worked really hard to embed the book and theme across many courses and disciplines. We also worked with the local community college and public library – striving for it to be a community-wide / county-wide experience each year
I’ve been considering the program here at Virginia Tech and using some good lateral thinking, I’m wondering how might we try something different? Or: what does a common book program look like without a book?
When you look at the goals (build a sense of community, encourage intellectual engagement, stimulate critical thinking, connect to VT values) it seems possible to do this in other ways. The book is really just a starting point. It gives students and instructors a common framework, but …
July 24, 2013, 3:06 pm
Wired, July 2013
Maybe it’s just me but I feel that the quality of WIRED has gone down this year. The latest issue touched a nerve. They outline how to get around academic publisher paywalls. One of their tips is to find someone in college who will give you their access info allowing you to proxy in. It bothered me and substantiated what I’m been feeling over the last few issues: an obvious decline in content and character.
Full disclosure – I’m a long time subscriber of WIRED. I’ve enjoyed their positive, progressive, future-oriented view of the world. But there has been a noticeable drop once Chris Anderson left. I mean, Long Tail, Free, and Makers are all awesome books. He is definitely a thought leader in economics-meets-technology. I didn’t fully realize it until it was gone, but Chris…
July 17, 2013, 2:53 pm
I hope your summer is going well. I wish that I could turn the calendar back to June in order to get more work done. It feels like a fast push into August and the new school year is looming. I just wanted to share a few random thoughts.
The Kids Today…
When I read statements like this it always makes me think of Elvis, The Beatles, or Metallica— artists that parents blamed for corrupting the youth. Oh these kids with their horrible music, their wacky fashions, and so on and so on. It seems there is always a perpetual superiority complex among generations. They don’t read the same books that we did. They don’t write very well. They are so dumb. Why can’t they be more like us?
Don’t these kids know they should be reading print books instead of mixing and editing audio files in the library? It’s almost as if…
July 9, 2013, 3:50 pm
I’ve been reflecting on my writing process lately. I’ve noticed that when I’m working on an article or a conference talk that I seem to gravitate toward a particular artist or album to stimulate my thinking. It’s not intentional but there always seems to be a unique soundtrack for each piece.
When I was writing my book I listened to a lot of Thursday and Three 6 Mafia. When I was writing startup it was a blend of Postal Service and Lil Wayne. The R&D paper was pretty much all Amanda Palmer and Dresden Dolls. ACRL’s discovery paper was classic grunge like old Soundgarden and AIC. Yet while preparing for that presentation it was early Metallica with a shot of Kanye and ASAP
Now don’t get me wrong—I don’t limit myself to just these artists. On any given day it could be back-to-back Danzig and Dr Dre in order to spark ideas or new emotions that I want to capture…