Previous:
Next:

The Gospel of the Toothbrush; Or, How Many Teeth Does Your Child Have (Left)?

March 6, 2012, 11:37 am

Just when you thought that middle-class parents had reached the limits of ignorance, the New York Times reports today that children under the age of five are showing up at the dentist’s office with a dozen or so cavities.  Some need the kind of extensive repair that is usually characteristic of people my age. One little darling featured in the story had 22 cavities, and was due for a root canal — at the age of two and a half years.  Go read it here.

My first thought was, well, these are probably parents working 3-5 jobs between them: things like toothbrushing just fall through the cracks as Mom and Dad pass each other in the hall like ghosts between day shift, night shift and swing shift.  But apparently not. The kid with the root canal?  Mom is described as a homemaker and Dad is in IT. Homemaker is not an easy career, I’ll grant you, which is a reason I checked the “historian” box after college instead of “baby machine.” But isn’t part of the job description of the stay-at-home-Mom “Take care of the kids?”

OK, so Mom is tired at the end of the day.  Or she thinks the old man took care of it while she was washing a Valium down with a Manhattan cooking dinner. But no person interviewed for the story said, “Gee, I’m so wrecked at the end of the day I forget to brush my own teeth.”  This epidemic of tooth decay is apparently caused by:

  • parents claiming that nobody told them to brush their children’s teeth (did anyone explicitly tell you to feed them?);
  • it upsets children to have their teeth brushed and it is just a very unpleasant way to end the day;
  • it upsets children even more to go to the dentist and have their teeth cleaned;
  • the mouths of children are bathed nonstop with waves of that healthy, healthy fructose-filled fruit juice that ensures 200 calories per sippy cup and a mouthful of sugar to boot;
  • when children aren’t drinking juice, they are drinking unfluoridated bottled water.

What to do, what to do?  By the time they get to the dentist these kids are in terrible pain, and are also convinced that not going to the dentist is a basic human right decreed by the Founding Fathers. On top of this, they need dental repair that is surgical in nature, the kind usually reserved for someone who has been held in captivity for the last two decades.

My favorite solution to working on a spoiled and terrified patient was the dentist who immobilized a child by strapping her to a board while she shrieked and wept (those parents deserve every ounce of guilt available, don’t they?) More often, dentists are using general anesthesia (that smells like bubble gum — because everything should be about candy, shouldn’t it?) to do what would count for some of us as a lifetime’s dental work in one long, grueling expensive session.  I guess when a parent finally notices a child’s teeth are falling out, you don’t want to take any chances said parent won’t return to get the job finished. As one pediatric dentist pointed out, “if any of us tried to get 12 teeth treated, we wouldn’t think that’s small.”  No sh!t, Shirley.  I had my first root canal at the age of 52, and was sufficiently cowed by the experience that I’ve been flossing (an act of self care that repels me) daily every since.

The message is that through avoiding daily unpleasantness, parents are creating dental calamities.  Here are some questions that the article doesn’t answer, however:

  • Why should someone have to tell a parent to brush a child’s teeth?  Do these parents brush their own teeth?  Enquiring minds want to know.
  • Don’t the children have really bad breath if their teeth are rotting in their heads?  Does no one get close enough to them to find out?
  • When did parents only engage in child care activities that pleased their offspring?
  • Are there other hygiene issues? Are these children bathed regularly?
  • Under what conditions does not engaging in basic care to the extent of your child’s teeth turning brown, becoming painful,cracking and falling out, and requiring root canal before the child is of school age not count as severe child neglect?
  • When do these parents think that regular toothbrushing should begin?  When the children get their adult teeth?
  • Does the capitulation to children’s desire not to brush their teeth bear any relation to other things not being taught in the home that have a later impact on child development?

Booker T. Washington would say that it does. I can’t help but recall that passage in Washington’s Up From Slavery (1901) in which the founder of the Tuskegee Movement extolls the toothbrush as the hallmark of civilization and a basic tool for human progress. In that book and throughout his life Washington preached his belief — otherwise known as “the Gospel of the Toothbrush” – that dental hygiene was the key to all other forms of success. In describing the deplorable physical state in which many of his rural students arrived to begin their education, he noted that the first step was to give a student a toothbrush and demonstrate its proper use.  “In all my teaching I have watched carefully the influence of the tooth-brush,” he wrote, “and I am convinced that there are few single agencies of civilization that are more far-reaching.” As the Tuskegee News reported today, February is not just Black History Month, it is also Children’s Dental Health Month.  Can this be a coincidence?  I think not. As the article explains:

When he came to Tuskegee no student was allowed to stay who did not utilize a toothbrush. In some cases it might be the only thing a student brought with them when they came to start school. Sometimes students did not initially understand that each person needed to have his or her own toothbrush, but they quickly learned their lesson.

“With few exceptions, I have noticed that, if we can get student to the point where, when the first or second toothbrush disappears, he of his own motion buys another, I have not been disappointed in the future of that individual,” wrote Washington, recounting one episode where he was inspecting rooms with a lady principal. “Absolute cleanliness of the body has been insisted upon from the first.”

So pediatricians, here’s an idea:  as new mothers and fathers are on their way out the door, hand then a toothbrush and a copy of Up from Slavery. It could save those children a lot of grief down the line.

This entry was posted in Archives, health care reform, the History of Disaster, the Horror. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • usaret

    I’m surprised you did not find two irritating usages that have become more prominent in the Times, particularly in the Sunday Magazine: the habit of beginng sentences with “which” used instead of a pronoun like “this” or “that,” and the misuse of the phrases “this begs the question” when the writer should use “raises” instead of “begs.”

    • sicetnon

      “Begging the question” and “raising the question” are not variants of the same idea, they are two completely different statements. To beg the question is to introduce as fact an unproven assertion. They are not interchangeable.

  • lydiatimmins

    I think commas are being used to indicate a breath or a pause in thought. Much like broadcast writing!

  • http://www.facebook.com/SixWingedSeraph Charles Wells

    Long sentences need something to tell the reader which part is subject phrase and which is predicate.  But the comma is overused already. Perhaps the slash “/”.

    Soon we will read everything on electronic tablets.  Put the subject in blue and the predicate in red.  This probably could be automated so it would work for most declarative sentences.

     Examples (using the slash since color doesn’t work on this site): 
    The snow that fell last night/ has already melted.
    The book with the pictures of the baby/ sits usually in the pink bedroom dresser.
    The horse raced past the barn/ fell.

  • cleverclogs

    I was just reading my local paper. I *wish* I had only quibbles with commas to report. One sports reporter spoke of a local high school basketball team “exercising their demons” and beating their rivals. All I can picture is a bunch of kids trotting the spawn of hell on a leash around the court before the big game.

    I’m a fan of functional punctuation myself. Perhaps it’s all the time I spend with Emily Dickinson or grading student essays, but most of the time my criterion is: does it clarify or confuse?

  • Guest

    Ben Yagoda is probably grinding his teeth and banging his head of the floor for mistakenly calling an object complement an indirect object, but there be a lesson there be there.

    English departments have taught and taught generations of students/educated citizens to believe that word carpentry is an algorithmic process governed by mechanical rules.  Right is right and wrong is wrong.  Learn the rules and apply them assiduously and, voila, well turned prose.

    James McCrimmon used to joke about  having “17 rules for the use of the comma, while the Good Lord got by with Ten Commandments.” (Even Woodrow Wilson got by with 14 points.)  Even if you could memorize all 17, most people don’t have the sentence analysis skills necessary to apply them.  Believe it or not, there’s an easier, more intuitively appealing way to do it.  It’s heuristic, not algorithmic or trial and error.  I won’t try to teach it here, but it ought to be common knowledge … and  it’s not … … … … and that fact is what we should be talking about.

  • hmprescott63

    Pediatricians are already working on this issue.  They have a section on oral health to advise parents.  One of the problems is that parents with good health insurance may not have good (or any) dental insurance.

    • Guest

      Amen to that.

  • cpotter01

    Not having dental insurance does  not, however, explain why children are not having their teeth brushed or learning to brush them.  I would also say — in the scale of things, a dental checkup is not an outlandish expense for a middle class family.   Costs less than having the tires rotated.

    • BintelGrrl

      Not if they find something that needs to be fixed.

  • crankychemist

    I agree with the main point- parents not brushing their kids’ teeth is ridiculous. I brush my kids’ teeth every day, 2x a day, screams or no.  

    However, your comment, “… I
    checked the “historian” box after college instead of “baby machine.”” is downright offensive.  (1) People can have kids AND be historians (or chemists, or lots of other things) and (2) Women who have children are not baby machines.  They are people with children, but still people.  Tenured Radical, you know both of those things, and you know the importance of choosing your language carefully.  This comment is beneath you.

    • cpotter01

      touchy, touchy. Why is it that parents entirely lose their sense of humor about all things parenty? It’s like suddenly y’all have a monopoly on what can be said about ye olde institutione of the familye. And forgive me — but I the general political atmosphere about female reproductive health puts this remark way down the list of offense-inducing humor.

      • crankychemist

        You’re right– there are a zillion things out there on the internet and in the world I could be calling offensive that more deserve it.  That doesn’t make your comment less irritating, but context is useful. 

        I don’t think, though, that I (or other parents) have fully lost our sense of humor about parenting, the family(e), or our own foibles.  Note, for example, that I didn’t complain about your crossed out comment about mom washing a Valium down with a Manhattan.  Sure, theoretically, someone could complain about this– stereotype of a checked out mom, blah, blah, blah.  But I recognized it as humor and rolled with it.

        The thing is, I feel, every day, like I am being told that my life should be an either/or. Either mom, or professor.  Either person, or breeder.  Either smart/hard-driving/ambitious, or nurturing/home with my kids. (And PS I don’t think my male colleagues get this message nearly as intensively as I and my female colleagues do.) Of course, you’re not the person telling me this (explicitly or implicitly) on a daily basis.  But you’re the one, today, who put it in writing, so you’re giving me a chance to write back. 

        I do think non-parents can say lots about the institution of family- like I said, your overall comment on teeth, and the meta-comment (which I’d summarize as, “Parents! be actual parents, and not such weenies!”) is dead-on.  Think of this as a compliment- I’ve come to have high expectations for you, and that one line didn’t meet them.

        • racmonti

          After I brushed my son’s teeth I washed down a valium with lite beer. Not now, though, since he’s old enough to do it alone. It was very traumatic.

    • historiann

      Right on cue!!!

    • librarianmer

      I have to say that I had a similar reaction to crankychemist on this one, though it didn’t bother me enough to comment. Your response to her in saying that she lacked a sense of humor was what really bugged me. Isn’t that what men who make sexist (or even harassing) comments say? Or racists? Maybe Sandra Fluke didn’t get Rush Limbaugh’s humor the other day (and wasn’t that actually part of his “apology”)? Oh those humorless feminists. It just seems ironic for you, of all people, to come back with that kind of a response. 
      As a middle-class parent/babymaker AND a professor (and a former student of yours), I was bothered by what you wrote… but I’m probably just humorless. 

    • profivy

      How dare you think that my job as a Homemaker is so easy that you could do it simultaneously with your job as a historian or other academic?  I mean, you wouldn’t try to be both a banker and an academic, or an airline pilot and a college professor, at the same time, would you?

      My point is that you’d think readers of an academic blog would be familiar with the literary tool of hyperbole.

  • matt_l

    Hi TR,

    An interesting post and article. I see the grounds for your outrage, but there is a dearth of clear information about when to start brushing.

    My partner and I have a ten month old, who just got her first two teeth last month. When the second tooth came in, the partner and I wondered when we were supposed to start brushing them. There wasn’t a clear answer in the parenting books. The books are full of caveats like “every child is different,” or “some parents do this,” and  “different children go through different developmental stages at different times,” (Parenting books, even the best ones, are irritating. As a historian, I appreciate prescriptive literature when it is, well, more prescriptive and not full of hedged bets). 

    So I asked my hygienist at the next cleaning. Apparently you can start wiping their gums down with a wash cloth as soon as the teeth start coming in. You can start brushing once they are all in, and you can tell them not to swallow the tooth paste. You don’t need to bring them into the dentist until they are two or three years old It was nice to have a clear answer, but we really haven’t started brushing yet either. We feel like winners if we can get her to fed, bathed, and into bed by 7.

    • historiann

      This is true–and pediatricians give conflicting information, too.  A lot of parents are also scared away from using fluoride toothpaste for their children–when I think it’s advisable to have them on the fluoride around age 2.  Dentists usually have much better advice–but as some in this thread have suggested, the parents may not have insurance and/or may be techy about going to the dentist themselves.

      Something I wonder about–especially with the SAHM and the IT dad kind of family–is if they’re also anti-vaxers.  My sense is that there’s a strong connection between people who don’t vaccinate their children and people who fear fluoridated water and toothpaste–they’re people who get too much “medical” information from the non peer-reviewed world wide timewasting web, of course, but they’re also people who may be part of subcultures that foster resistance to allopathic medicine & traditional dentistry.

      At least, these seem to be the families that I hear about from my pediatrician friends & family members as the families who have the most rigid (and ridiculous) notions of health care for their children. 

      On the issue of noncompliance because it’s not “fun”:  maybe parents need to get over their own mouth phobias?  My sense is that babies and little kids think pretty much everything is fun so long as you do something with them and act like you’re having fun.  Remember Michael Banks from Mary Poppins?  “I don’t want to go to the park.  I want to play tidy up the nursery!”

      • historiann

        p.s.  Just make sure you brush really well after that “spoonful of sugar!”

      • racmonti

        I grew up in NJ and I remember the water fluridation debate–everything from a communist plot to “it causes cancer,” ironically possibly the only think in NJ’s environment that doesn’t cause cancer! I do think your hypotheses about the connection to the anti-vaccine gang is an interesting one.

  • urbanexile

    This is a wonderful posting, though I agree with crankychemist about the “baby machine” line: Regrettable. 

    That said, this fact of decaying children’s teeth speaks volumes (I think) about the immaturity and perhaps even emotional immaturity of the culprit parents who are not parenting. The Articles of Parenting, as you and I are well aware, has as its first paragraph “doing that which, though good for the child, will make you extremely unpopular.” But kids want to be popular with the other kids, so they don’t make ‘em do the icky stuff.

    Ponder this:  As of 2011, the average age (AVERAGE) of video game players was 37.  The reason for the mass regression in our society which is not present in other societies, like India for example? Don’t know. Somebody had best figure it out though.

    • sciencegrad

      Why do people like to place blame with video games, but not anything else?  Last time I checked, the time the average gamer would spend on video games is less than the average person would spend doing other distracting things, like spending time at a bar.  

      • urbanexile

        Hi science grad. You misunderstood me: I am not suggesting it is the FAULT of video games. I am suggesting that people who go into adulthood still fanatic about video games are people who are likely lacking in emotional maturity. That said, didn’t used to be that skinny white kids strode into their middle america high schools and wiped out a bunch of classmates. Just saying.

        • sciencegrad

          I’ll need you to define “fanatic.”  If you mean obsessed to the point where the hobby is destructive to the life of the individual or their dependents, then that is a problem.  If you mean that video games are a persons favorite hobby, that does not imply that they are shirking other responsibilities in order to play.  In either case, video games can be replaced with anything that has any history of addiction.

      • urbanexile

        For reasons unknown I couldn’t respond to your last comment, so I do so here. Look, I get it that you probably like video games and you’re probably a good person. I am just comparing two facts: the average age of video game fans is 37; and kids teeth are rotting because their parents aren’t parenting.  Make of it what you will. 

  • jliedl

    The idea that baby teeth are disposable probably leads too many parents and caregivers to figure “why force them through the unpleasantness of brushing and flossing” but it’s a bad decision as we well know. Baby teeth have to last for many years and you’re spot on when you note that sugary juices wreak havoc.

    I remember how tough grad school was simply due to no dental coverage. I had a wisdom tooth fracture in my mouth and fortunately found a kind dentist to extract the remains at a reasonable charge.

  • hmprescott63
  • vonrankle

    “everything should be about candy, shouldn’t it?”

    To me, this is a bigger problem than you’d imagine.  Not to go full MeMe Roth here, but my partner and I have been borderline horrified by the food at our daughter’s preschool.  Cookies and juice for snack (plus challah and juice on Fridays, but I guess we can let that one slide . . .), weekly Domino’s pizza days, and on and on.  Not to mention the fact that kids are now given juice and snacks to accompany every mundane task or outing they’re taken on.  The constant sugar is bad enough in itself, but I also have to wonder if the parent who wails that junior simply refuses to sit still at the grocery store without a snack in his hand is also the parent who can’t be bothered to brush his teeth afterward.

  • tenured_radical

    Well, not to stir the pot unnecessarily, but I continue to be mystified about why many academic mothers are in solidarity with all mothers, even bad or mythical ones. Christ on a cracker, can we never tell a mother joke ever without some of you telling me I have driven a stake through your heart? Why does it have to be about you?? So you thought it wasn’t funny — crap, are you pissed off at Eugene O’Neill too? Edward Albee? Mary Karr?

    But I digress. When I am writing seriously in this post, it is about parents, not mothers — and I am not making this $hit up. It came out of the newspaper article.Seriously, since when did teeth being little and only in play for ten to fifteen years mean they didn’t require brushing?

    • radiosaturday

      Well, Orwell has something on that in “The Road to Wigan Pier”…

  • usaret

    I wonder how many parents of these children with dental problems let their children drink bottled water–most bottled water does not contain fluoride, while most municipal water does (New Jersey has issues with this, as a recent NYTimes article pointed out). My wife and her sister are both dentists, and frequently have patients who drink nothing but bottled water, thinking it “safer” than their local water. Of course, as the article points out, there are lots of kids drinking lots of soft drinks and juice, which both contains a great deal of sugar.

  • miskeena

    Being a good parent is very hard.  Sometimes you’ve got to hold their little noses and shove the brush in their mouths.  You’ve got to mean business.

  • edwoof

    I actually thought the “baby machine” comment was self-deprecating and respectful in a backhanded-type and ivy league-ish way (“being a Homemaker is not an easy career, I grant you, which is why I checked the historian box instead of …..”——- I also would suspect that the fact that the box was ”checked” rather than “ticked” indicates that the move from Zenith University to Metropolis has been completed mentally.) You will note that the ‘H’ in Homemaker was capitalized while the ‘h’ in historian wasn’t and what possibily could be better evidence of TR’s self-deprecation and respect for Homemakers? This is actually a compliment and a shout out to Homemakers which would be obvious if You All Baby Machines and Baby Machine Lovers weren’t so busy wallowing in the mud pit of righteous indignation. Geez.

    And the TR called being a Homemaker a career (more evidence of respect), which I think is overgenerous. A career implies structured training and then an upward trajectory of responsibilities and an associated increase in compensation, all of which homemaking ain’t.

    But with respect to teeth, my gut reaction is that

    1. One’s own teeth are no longer considered permanent and the parents have internalized the idea that the alternatives to natural teeth are actually better. Teeth are therefore imminently replaceable now, just like clothes. Therefore, taking care of junior’s teeth isn’t on the radar.

    2. Children are now considered by many parents to be an accessory not unlike a fancy type of pet. You don’t brush your dogs teeth, do you?

    3. The teacher will brush the kid’s teeth at school as part of No Child Left Behind.

    4. The cold war is over so the Russians are no longer flouridating our water.

    5. When you are a child today, there is no more nightly ritual of washing up, brushing your teeth and having your parents read to you because after you eat (also no longer a ritual, just sustenance) you are online in your room until at some point you and your parents yell a perfunctory “good night” through the closed door.

    • cpotter01

      This was exactly my point.  Bless you.

    • racmonti

      Hey my boy was brushing his teef before he was 1 (with help from me). Did all by my lonesome self, too (not by choice). Only 1 cavity in 10 years, not too bad and that (baby) tooth fell out. He even uses mouthwash and flosses! Contact me if you want to make a movie about us.

  • TA4EVA

    i’d be curious to know how many kids TR has troubled herself to raise.

    • cpotter01

      Because only people who actually own children have the right to speak about them. This would, of course, have ruled out people like Jane Adams, Molly Dewson, David Souter and Pauli Murray from having had any policy role regarding children, just so you know where you are going with this line of argument.  Don’t forget to floss, you hear?

      • TA4EVA

         Heh.  You had me at “own.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=49705679 Jason Curtis Fossella

    I brush my *dog’s* teeth every night. How are they not brushing their children’s?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=49705679 Jason Curtis Fossella

    and, the dog loves it. probably has something to do with the chicken-flavored tooth paste. it’s like pâté with an abrasive agent

  • jiminnc

    This sentence doesn’t work: “Otherwise known as “the Gospel of the Toothbrush,” Washington preached his belief that dental hygiene was the key to all other forms of success.”

    “Known” here must go with Washington, who of course himself is not a gospel.

    It’s as if you said, “Wearing a new collar and dog tags, Washington walked his dog.”

    • cpotter01

      Jeez, thanks for the grammar lesson: consider it fixed.  As Mitt Romney would say, “Sure appreciatcha!”

  • graddirector

    Well, my oldest daughter was one of those kids with a root canal at the age of three and cavities in most of her baby teeth.  We started brushing her teeth when the first one came in, did not give her juice, took her to the dentist starting at age 2 and gave her fluoride supplements (we are on well water).  There is no clear reason for her horrible baby teeth (thankfully her adult teeth are still cavity free) and her younger sister never has had a cavity with the same approach.

    While I don’t doubt that some of this is parental behavior, I have become convinced that some kids are just more susceptible to cavities as well.

    • barberl

      I agree with graddirector. I hardly ever brush my little kids’ teeth and they are cavity free! and I definitely think that there is a good deal of misleading information on this: lots of parenting books that discuss tooth-brushing as getting your kids into good “habits” for when their adult (read: real) teeth come in, admonitions to avoid fluoride until your child is old enough not to swallow it (when is that?! how do you know?!). Reading the NYtimes article definitely made me more committed, but I certainly wouldn’t characterize my previous practices as neglectful.

      And to answer your question, TR, about why parents get so defensive about this sort of stuff, I think it is because parenting is something that everybody and their mother has an opinion on (sorry, couldn’t help the pun), and parents are simply inundated with advice. Yet in spite of all this (conflicting and sometimes misleading) advice, we still make major, often stupid, mistakes. It is hard, when we see another parent getting judged for a stupid mistake, not to identify…

  • notafeminist

    This is why I will never again call myself a feminist or align myself with the malignancy feminism has become. Your complete and utter disrespect for my life and choices indicates quite clearly that feminism now means “all y’all except you dumb bitches at home raising your own kids”.. Well screw you. If I were raising someone’s else’s children in a daycare, I would be given at least a bare minimum of respect, but raising my own children invites nothing but invective and sneering contempt from the very women who profess to support all women in their choices. Yep.  Screw all of you. 

    • graddirector

       Not sure where all of that anger is coming from, from what I can read no one is picking on you for being a stay at home mom.  However, there is generally alot more invective towards working mothers for not “being there” for their children every day until they enter college (and the associated messy house) than from working mothers towards the ones who stay at home.  While I could  not have done it when my kids were little and stayed sane since I find babies/toddlers mind numbing, there is nothing wrong with it as a choice per se as long as one goes into it with eyes open.. 

      • RetroGal

        Maybe it’s the “sarcastic” tone of the writer of the article – “baby making machine” doesn’t exactly scream acceptance of those women who choose to become mothers. It’s a degrading way to put it. I don’t care if you want to have kids or don’t want to have kids – that is your choice. But referring to those who DO as “baby making machines” doesn’t show much respect.

    • cpotter01

      You might want to stay off the interwebz until  you feel a little better…..

    • edwoof

      If you “were raising someone’s else’s [sic] children in a day care”, chances are you’d be prosecuted if this e-mail is indicative of your character and propensity toward anger.

  • BintelGrrl

    I’m an adjunct. I can’t afford to take my child to the dentist. That’s not a joke.

    • tenured_radical

      Which is really awful, and I’m sorry. I hope you know that the NY Times article is about people with dental insurance who don’t brush their kids teeth and many of these comments for some reason are about other things.

      Just so you know: dental schools usually run inexpensive clinics where you and your child can go to have your teeth cleaned by techs and dentists in training, supervised by professors. If you are near one, that is an option to get the two of you through this time.

    • joejoe1

      Anne McLeer, SEIU:  ”Adjuncts who work a full-time part-time load are part of the new working poor now.”

      From the upcoming documentary: ‘Junct: The Trashing of Higher Ed. in America:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDTYjqjc-SU&feature=player_embedded

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037