Previous:
Next:

Living In The Middle; Or, What I Learned At My First Job

December 31, 2011, 1:51 pm

Today is the day I go off the payroll of Zenith University, the institution that gave me my first job. Tomorrow I officially go on the payroll of another university in Metropolis, the city where I went to graduate school.  If all goes well, we will move in mid-summer.

OK, so Zenith wasn’t actually my first job.  I had a fair amount of work experience before I began my twenty years there in July 1991. Prior employment included: aluminum can recycling; substitute receptionist at Philadelphia’s CBS affiliate; popcorn stand attendant at a neighborhood movie house (the summer Jaws was released, no less); stringer for the Hartford Courant; administrative assistant and general dogsbody at a boutique public relations firm; writer/editor at an advertising agency; bicycle messenger; teaching assistant, research assistant, assistant to the Dean of the College; proofreader at the SoHo News; adjunct instructor of history (multiply by 6 here); and visiting assistant professor.

These are only the jobs I remember and for which I was paid:  I remember many other unpaid jobs, and there have been times I was unemployed but was paid anyway. I was also fired once.

Then there was the job writing reviews of photography shows for the misogynist downtown New York gay weekly (if you are of a certain age you know which one I’m talking about — remember the one that insisted until it went bankrupt that AIDS was actually untreated syphilis and could be cured with massive doses of penicillin?)  But I’m not sure that really counted as a job, since the editor I worked for told me it was unpaid but a terrific way to build a book of clippings that might lead to a real job as a journalist. Writing for no money seemed fair to me, which is my good fortune considering what academic writing pays. I knew nothing about photography, or art, except what I had learned in the Introduction to Art History and from my college roommate, who was a painter.  My only other training for this work was reading Susan Sontag’s On Photography. I would view the exhibit, consult Sontag, run to the library to research the photographer, and then find some intelligent way to write about the exhibit.  This system worked pretty well, and I was assigned new unpaid reviews to write on a regular basis. It was only after the arts editor died (of AIDS) that I learned the weekly had a peculiar payment system.  They distributed a lump sum to the editors who had commissioned various pieces; the editors were then supposed to pay the writers.  So actually my job as a photography reviewer had been paid work; it’s just that I never got the money.  It was after this that I decided all my efforts to break into journalism were failing, and I decided to go to graduate school.

Thus ended my career in the fine arts. The rest, as they say, is History.

When I landed at Zenith after graduating from Potemkin University I felt like a lucky, lucky Radical.  There were a number of reasons for this, one being that I had finally succeeded in paring down many ill-paid jobs to one good one and that I had consolidated my notion of what I wanted to do.  I had found a way to write and be supported for it. People seemed to like me, teaching was fun and being a history prof seemed like a straight shot to A Nice Life and many free books.  What I did not realize at the time was that the process of finding oneself is a long one and, it you are very lucky, that process goes on and on and on, stopping and re-starting in the most extraordinary way.  There are moments when you wrestle with terrible self doubt and realize that mistakes have been made — and if you are fortunate, they are balanced out by the moments in which you get to look around you and compliment yourself for a job well done.  That sensation also usually does not last, in my experience, and a great deal of life is lived in the middle.  It is the business of making life in the middle worthwhile that matters most, I think.

So without further ado, here are five things I learned at my first job:

1. If it isn’t right for you, no matter how good a job you have, you can always leave. Here I speak not for myself, but from observing others — many of whom I loved dearly and miss to this day — who made the decision to leave Zenith before me.  They went on to have careers elsewhere, sometimes doing something quite different.  Zenith is a wonderful, wonderful school with a terrific faculty and you should definitely consider sending your child there.  But — and I speak to all of you who work at equally wonderful places — if the only thing keeping you there is that everyone tells you how lucky you are to work there, I give you permission to leave if you need or wish to do so. You don’t need to wait until you feel bad and unlucky; the people you leave behind will still be your friends if you want them to be.

2.  If you leave your job, you don’t have to leave for a job that is “better” by all the conventional standards of the academy. But you should go someplace where people seem happy and engaged with their work.  Over time, I have learned that people’s happiness in their work does not correlate with the status of their job in the way that you might imagine. Hence, moving up in the world might not actually give you better friends and a more productive work environment. You could realize that you have transported your unhappiness to a location where it will flourish to an unprecedented degree. Very few people grasp the full implications of this concept, which reverses the logic of Lev Tolstoy’s famous opening line of Anna Karenina (“Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.”)  In fact, in the academy, unhappy people are all alike, whether they teach at Harvard or at Bauhaus Community College.  The vast majority of people who you would think ought to be happy are often as focused on those things that frustrate and disappoint them as the people you work with now. But I have found that happy scholars are all happy in very different ways, and it is usually because they have found some way to be themselves, do the work they want to do and balance a healthy ego with attention to the well-being of those around them.

This lesson correlates with lesson # 3, which is:

3.  If you figure out what work will make you happy and do it with integrity, you will probably succeed. I have come to believe that this is most true about writing.  Blogging and other internet platforms are one route into a wider range of publishing options, but even though academic publishing is becoming more difficult in some fields, it is still probably easier to publish as an academic than it is as an ordinary person.  I suspect that this is because they don’t pay us anything and, as yet, university presses are not expected to contribute to the profits of international corporate media giants.  These things work together to make it possible to get a real book into an interested reader’s hands without having a platform, an agent, a proposal that doesn’t die in marketing, and Nan Talese kicking a$$ at the NYRB.  But it becomes even easier to get anything done if you can:

4. Commit to whatever you are doing in such a way that you discover, or rediscover, your love for it. This can mean doing things that other people disapprove of, or even that they have contempt for.  It can be difficult, because finding your own way can result in various forms of institutional discipline, primarily the failure to reward or recognize your work.  If this is true, you have to ask yourself:  am I wrong or are they wrong?  Take your work out of the institution aggressively and see what happens. Chances are, if there are those outside your institution who think your work is original and interesting, it actually is.  It doesn’t mean that you are never wrong, but it probably does mean that you are on to something — and that you need to associate more closely with the people who claim to be learning from you and less closely with the ones who criticize you.  This doesn’t mean you have to leave your job:  rather, it could give you the self confidence to keep doing what you are doing where you are, be less affected by the disdain of others and find new allies in unexpected places.

5.  Plan. If I had anything to do over in my life, it would be to have been to locate, and plan my life in response to, my inner compass when I was younger. I have only very recently learned how to organize my professional and intellectual life in such a way that the work I expect of myself has acquired some dominance over the work other people expect of me.  Sometimes I still blow it, but at least I know I’ve blown it when I do. Finding and honoring your inner compass is a particular issue if you work at a place like Zenith where practically everyone, everywhere in the university (colleagues, staff and students), is incredibly interesting. SLACs have lots of compelling short-term incentives for professional development that rarely take into account that you are already working a 60 hour week, or that ask you to get interested in something that really doesn’t have anything to do with the work you are currently doing. Most of these things worked out well for me intellectually, but some were difficult to convert into longer-term dividends because the enrichment they promised came at the price of a kind of institutional ADD. But sometimes I think that those periods in my life that lacked focus were productive in less tangible ways. I certainly learned more than a few things along the way: how to re-tool, how to learn new intellectual languages, how to find the smartest people and learn from them, how to have true friends and colleagues, how to get a project up and running, how to conceptualize paradigmatic shifts in a program of study, how a university works (or why it does not), and most importantly, how to have fun.

So I am perversely glad that I never listened to all those people who were constantly telling me to “just say no.” There were a lot of things that I coulda, and shoulda, said “no” to at Zenith that have actually turned me into the person who is, as we speak, packing a few bags and boxes to get on the milk train back to Metropolis, where this all started, and begin a new job for the first time in 20 years.

Because you know what? Sometimes you wake up one day and realize that you got the career you wanted after all.

Happy New Year.

This entry was posted in colleagueship, Fate, Fear Itself, Fung Wah Bus, it gets better, the job fairy is smiling. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://twitter.com/katrinagulliver Katrina Gulliver

    Congratulations on the move! I wonder whether academia tends to put more expectations on people that “THIS is the job that is desirable”, so it is difficult for those who are unhappy in that situation to face that, and just leave.
    This obviously relates to the issues that Tony Grafton has been raising recently about plans B through Z for history PhDs. But even within university employment, we limit ourselves by seeing one type of institution or job as “desirable”, when it won’t be for everyone.
    I know I have learnt more about myself through my academic research than I have about the subjects I was actually studying. Perhaps in some cases figuring out what you really want may be harder than getting it.
    May the job fairy smile on others in the new year :)

  • pianiste

    One assumes from the little bio to the right of Professor Potter’s posts that “Zenith University” is Wesleyan University in Connecticut. So what’s the name of the university in “Metropolis” where Professor Potter will henceforth be employed?

    The coyness about the names of the two schools prompts one to wonder a) why is Professor Potter leaving Wesleyan in the middle of the academic year? and b) what’s behind advice item No. 2, “If you leave your job, you don’t have to leave for a job that is ‘better’ by all the conventional standards of the academy”? (Is Professor Potter no longer going to be a professor?)

    BTW, I’m a fan of “Tenured Radical” and think it’s the best single-author blog at The Chronicle. I fear for its being able, however, to continue to call itself “Tenured Radical.”

    • tenured_radical

      Nothing to hide here:  the timeline has to do with a set of negotiations that worked out to everyone’s satisfaction even though they are a bit unconventional.  Yes, I am going to be a professor — bloggers don’t always project their personal experience on everything, and what I am trying to do is get people to think about what might be a “better” job outside of conventional frameworks (ie, if you don’t go to an Ivy after Zenith, what’s the point?)

      My next job is at the New School in NY, and I’m very excited about it.  The reason I use pseudonyms for institutions is that there is a lot of traffic here that could drive these posts up the list of Google hits, and I don’t think that the places I work should necessarily be subjected to publicity they don’t want — particulalry in the event of a troll attack.  Glad you like the blog, and it will be up to the readers to decide whether I should change the name of the blog to Self-Satisfied Old Fart or not.

      • pianiste

        OK. But since a couple of questions in a comment got the beans spilled anyway, why did TR use pseudonyms in the first place? TR really can’t protect grown-up institutions such as Wesleyan and the New School from “publicity they don’t want–particularly in the event of a troll attack.” Academe now has its own Office of Homeland Security?

        “If you don’t go to any Ivy after Zenith, what’s the point?” is less than a “conventional framework.” It’s a stuffy notion held by a relatively small segment of academe, who work predominantly in the East. To ascribe it to enough of TR’s readers to make her have to “get people to think differently about “what might be a better job” is a little, well, patronizing. A lot of us actually don’t think that the only improvement on a job at an Eastern SLAC is one at an Ivy.

        • tenured_radical

          Perhaps I didn’t make myself clear:  it’s not about hiding anything, it’s about an ethical position that balances my right to free speech with the institution’s right to represent itself in chosen ways. I am respecting the autonomy of institutions to not be fully identified with me.  I have no interest in protecting institutions, but I do have an interest in not making myself unnecessarily noxious to my employers. If I become institutionally noxious, I would like it to be about something more principled than, say, a blog post about college football. I never had an inkling that Wesleyan did not respect my free speech, and I expect the same of the New School. That said, given the output and readership of this blog, Wesleyan (and I presume the New School will feel similarly) may not wish to be identified with every view expressed in this space. I am actually quite sure of that, in fact, and making them pseudonymous means that a simple Google search will not leave the impression that they are. Troll attacks push a post way up in Google rankings:  hence, it is most likely that the most politically fraught posts will come up in a search using the institution’s name.

          And by the way?  Under the best of circumstances, academic blogging has a lot of peculiar social consequences and creates as many hurt feelings through misidentification and misunderstanding as it does through deliberate representation. I can’t tell you how many times I have completely invented a character in the blog and later learned that some colleague felt injured because s/he believed it was a portrait of hirself. If you start your own blog, you will learn this. Personally, I think it is worth it to not incite  administrators or colleagues unnecessarily and risk creating situations where I have to justify my rights to free public speech and constantly be alert to relationships in need of repair.  It’s also respectful not to cause unnecessary anxiety to other people.

          Lastly, I don’t know where you work, but many of us do live in that stuffy little bell jar — my point is that it is very liberating not to do so. That will be news to some people:  if it isn’t to you, well good for you.  I have never understood why people feel patronized or condescended to when I express views that are already in synch with their own, but I think that’s a therapy question and not for discussion on this thread.

          Now I must go and figure out why my entire blog seems to be presenting itself in italics……

        • pianiste

          At the risk of being a nag, and an obstinate one, I still don’t see why saying at the outset, “I happen to be changing jobs, going from one at Wesleyan University to one at The New School,” wouldn’t have been entirely appropriate. It’s not like Wesleyan never lost a tenured faculty member to another institution, or that The New School never hired somebody away from another school, is it? As long as TR doesn’t nastily dump on Wesleyan on the way out, what’s the harm?

          The old saw about academic politics being so vicious because there’s so little at stake, apparently has a flip side: Academic politics can also be so decorous because there’s so little at stake.

          As to that “stuffy little bell jar,” it’s hard to feel any sympathy for the need for liberation for the people who live in it. These people are Ph.D.’s, putative intellectuals, with minds allegedly broad enough to see the bigger picture. If they’re intellectually truncated enough to think that if, when they move from an SLAC they don’t go to an Ivy they’re making an embarrassing lateral move at best, well, too bad. I’ll reserve my sympathies for the family down the block who think that if they trade in their Chevy Cruz for anything less than an Audi8 they’ll be the laughingstock of the neighborhood.

        • millie_fink

          All that Passive Aggressive does not look good on you. You should change into something else.

  • physioprof

    These are all excellent pieces of advice for new faculty, especially about taking your work aggressively outside your institution. While it might seem to new faculty like they “work for” their university, really they “work for” their field(s) of scholarly inquiry. And it is ultimately the judgment of their colleagues in their field(s) that will determine their future academic trajectory, including promotion and tenure.

    Best wishes for an easy and fruitful move!! Once you get settled in at your new digs, shoot me an e-mail if you want to meet some time in Metropolis for a coffee or cocktail.

    • tenured_radical

      Thanks pal — send me your real email again & we are good to go.  I lost it in the Great Address Book Calamity of 2011.

      • physioprof

        I just e-mailed you at what I think is your correct Gmail address.

    • millie_fink


       While it might seem to new faculty like they “work for” their university, really they “work for” their field(s) of scholarly inquiry. 

      You must work at a research school? Those teaching at “teaching” schools have no such sense of their work. Job One is teaching, not research.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1839337044 Lisa Lynne Moore

    Seems like a position at the New School is the very definition of Tenured Radical!  Congratulations TR.  Your fan, Lisa.
    http://sisterarts.typepad.com/sister-arts-gardens-po/

  • susanda

    Good luck, with the move, TR. I think your advice is great. The only thing I’d say about the planning is that it often takes time and doing things to figure out your inner compass. I think mine was really only calibrated in my late 40s, and it took time for things to fall into place. I actually think one reason that many people in academia are unhappy is that they decided what they wanted to be in their early 20s, and haven’t revisited it. Also that we find ourselves engaged by different things at different points in our careers – we can never assume that what gives us satisfaction today will do so in ten years time…

  • loumac

    Good advice, especially to those thinking of leaving academia. I can’t think of another profession, except perhaps the priesthood, the leaving of which prompts such a peculiar blend of judgment, incomprehension, doubt (and maybe some unacknowledged jealousy).  

  • jliedl

    TR, congratulations on making the move to something and someplace new that will help you continue to grow as a professional while you do the same for others. I’m not in a position to move, myself, for a variety of reasons, but so much of your advice applies to those of us who’re remaking ourselves and our careers in situ. #3 and #4 hit on exactly what I found in the last few years and they keep me going even when the other pressures of the job feel unbearable!

  • graddirector

    I would like to emphasize one of tenured radicals comments…. Make sure that any job change at the tenured ranks is actually not making your situation worse.  We have had some turn-over of tenured faculty at our institution and I would say that at least 1/2 of these moves were rapidly regretted by those making them.  All institutions have their problems and the biggest mistakes come when folks decide to leave on relatively short notice (in academics in less than a year) after a particular irritating event.  In one case, a full professor left our institution in a snit over not getting an administrative post and insulted everyone doing so.  Guess whose reappointment was voted down nearly unanimously by our faculty when he wanted to return a couple of years later after the “great job” that he failed to research with due diligence turned out to be a dead end..

  • urbanexile

    I am thrilled for you, as you know, and I consider it an enormously courageous act to change jobs at this point in your illustrious career. This blog should be in O Magazine as an encouragement to all women who want to grow at whatever age. Shall I send it over and try to prove myself as a competent agent? ;-)

    Have fun, TR, and have a great new year.

    • tenured_radical

      Definitely.  If you can sell something, we will talk turkey on agenting.

  • http://otherplanesofthere.blogspot.com/ David Crawford Jones

    Good luck with the new gig, TR. 

  • http://twitter.com/imdesigntank Chris Raymond

    This is a great article, and I found myself nodding over and over again–your thoughts apply equally to designers. I esp. loved the comment “ou could realize that you have transported your unhappiness to a location where it will flourish to an unprecedented degree”

    Thanks.
    Chris Raymond

  • mulerooster

    Very good article.  I can relate to a lot of it as a graduate student and new faculty member.  #1 especially relates to my experience in grad school.  Unfortunately, it’s kind of hard to quit grad school when you really want your degree.  And I definitely had a lot of relatives tell me how happy I should be (or how lucky I am) to be a student at this world famous place.
    http://wayfaringprofessor.blogspot.com/ 
    I’m going to bookmark this article for future use.  Congrats on the new job.

  • witwag22

    chaudière à pellets

    chaudières pellets

    chaudière granulés

    chaudière à granulés

    With
    extensive experience in the fields of renewable energy, pellet boilers and
    modern plumbing solutions, the team of JC Habitat helps you transform your
    projects by actual performance and functional, on time and on budget.

  • cwgregory

    T.R., I got here because of a link posted on, um, zenchat. I enjoyed the article immensely, and like other commenters I think the advice applies perfectly to other fields, in my case software engineering. Since I became self-employed a dozen or so years back I am much happier with my work and even with my lifestyle, despite a significantly reduced income. I get to pick what I work on and who I work with, and reinvent my work life on a daily basis. It’s exhilarating, when I remember not to worry too much about where tomorrow’s rent will come from and just enjoy the challenges and opportunities.

    Good luck with the new gig, be yourself, and be true to yourself.

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037