Previous:
Next:

Radical Thanksgiving II: the Top Ten Turkeys for 2011

November 23, 2011, 12:09 pm

Back in 2007 I gave out awards to institutions and individuals in education who had gone above and beyond the call of duty to make turkeys out of themselves during that calendar year.  At the time, I imagined that this would be an annual event.  What was I thinking?  That the Tenured Radical blog would collapse and I would never have to write such a long post again?  That I would give up academia for a well-paid job as a writer for Rachel Maddow?

I dunno.  But four years later, here we are at the Chronicle of Higher Education feeling inspired by the year’s hijinks. The task of giving awards is also less burdensome than you might imagine: after all, while every year in education has its turkeys, consistency would require that we only do this again in 2015.  So with that, we will start with Turkey #10 and proceed to the Big Turkey in the #1 spot (as I write, the committee is still wrestling with that final choice……)

10.  The first, and freshest, turkey goes to the Nassau County high schools (Great Neck North, Roslyn and North Shore Hebrew Academy) that have only this week figured out that their students are paying other, more successful, students to take their SATs.  We at Tenured Radical are happy to award this turkey for two reasons.  First, if the Republican presidential candidates are lecturing us about how taxation foments class war, it seems that they have missed the obvious fact that the privileged have now gone to war with each other over something as trivial as test scores.  The 1% are using every weapon in their arsenals to defeat each other for those precious legacy spots at prestigious universities:  money, money and $$$.  Our second comment is that the local prosecutor (who is employed, after all, by the same government that runs the schools) is charging the test taker — Sam Eshaghoff — with a felony. However, the little darlings who shelled out $3500 per test (including a girl who is, I suppose, named Sam?) are only being charged with misdemeanors. In a just world, all of these students would be treated equally and sent off for a two-year stint in the Army that might introduce them to the idea of hard work.  Instead I think we can expect thousands of hours of community service done by grudging little pukes who don’t really think they did anything wrong. Stay tuned.

9.  To venture capitalist, entrepreneur and education dabbler Peter Thiel we send a little can of turkey soup which, if the world operates on the principles he is proposing, he will be able to transform into an entire turkey in time for the feast day.  Thiel, who is paying kids $100,000 a piece to not go to college, has just funded his first group of Mini-Mes on the principle that, against all evidence to the contrary, only untalented people who don’t know how to work hard should go to college.  Who is John Galt? I ask you.

8.  There are so many reasons to give a turkey to our favorite Republican presidential hopeful “Mitten” Romney, even though he could buy a turkey for every household in New Hampshire (and probably has.)  We are going with this ad, which the website Freedom’s Lighthouse breathlessly praises for its “mean, junk yard dog” approach (that’s Harvard-trained Mitten, alright) to Governor Rick Perry’s policy of offering in-state tuition to undocumented Mexican students. Why this ad in particular?  Not because it compares Perry to Democrats, or because it has a film clip of Mexican President Vicente Fox praising Perry that looks doctored and has English subtitles even though Fox is speaking perfectly good English. No.  This turkey is being awarded because the uber-privileged Mitt might want to think twice about insulting the country that harbored his polygamous relatives after the Mormon Church banned plural marriage in 1890.

7.  Our next turkey goes to (wait for it…..) President Barack Obama and his empty-headed Secretary of Education Arne Duncan for thinking that cutting, pasting and photo shopping No Child Left Behind represents an education policy. In fact, we would argue that Obama has done more for education by sending Mrs. Obama to public schools and cluing poor children in on the idea that, with luck and pluck, Black women can become attorneys. As children drop out of school right and left under mandated testing regimes, the administration offers relief from NCLB’s provisions only to those states which are being “responsible” and “accountable” under the current guidelines. This would imply that these states have already successfully improved education under NCLB, which is probably not true.  Meanwhile, the Obama administration continues to not get it that delivering billions of tax dollars to the testing industry, for-profit education firms and charter schools run by any fool who can get approved does nothing to improve public education for the 99%.  But it sure does deliver the dollars to the 1% so that their kids can pay $3500 to have someone else take their SATs for them.

6.  Let’s send boatloads of turkeys to DKE houses everywhere and let the boys who will be boys have their way with them.  Because no matter how much these guys claim to be innocent bystanders to mayhem that just magically occurs, DKE seems to be at or near the bottom of the barrel when it comes to reckless, institutionalized misogynistic behavior.  Go here for an account of the Yale chapter’s actions, which resulted in a five-year suspension this year. When I was at Yale almost three decades ago, I was told by a rattled pledge that initiates were instructed to go into the next room and f^ck a goat as part of the ritual. Even at the time, I thought: if they treat other men that way, why wouldn’t they treat women badly?

5.  While we are at it, let’s send a turkey to professional conservative Charlotte Allen, who has decided to make her salary this year by going around the country declaring that there is a feminist war on fraternities. Allen has helpfully pointed out yet another facet of our grand feminist strategy to Destroy Men Completely, Turn Women Into Lesbians and gestate generations of children in recycled beer kegs so that Rape Will Be Completely Eliminated Through The Elimination Of Intercourse Itself.  Allen notes that fraternities “may not be at exactly the apex of moral and social respectability that they occupied, say, a century or more ago,” but that suspending a frat for advocating rape and unwanted anal penetration is “the Fort Sumter of the campus war against fraternities.” The “No means yes, yes means anal” made her laugh — not because she is in favor of sexual assault but because sexual assault can be funny! The chant was, she writes, “a well-placed poke in the eye at the Yale Women’s center and the humorless feminists who staff similar campus women’s centers across the country.” For my money, I would prefer an old-fashioned “Why don’t you shave your legs?” which is what women like Allen used to say to dismiss feminist concerns about sexual assault. Allen recently visited Zenith where, I am happy to say, free speech was greeted with more speech, leaving her “flabbergasted” and ever more persuaded that our students are brainwashed by feminism.

4.  One turkey to every person at Penn State, the Second Mile Foundation and the Sandusky family who had reason know those boys were being harmed and who kicked it upstairs, shut their eyes or walked away.  And how about more turkeys for every person who has ever covered up a rape at any college or university, or has established policies that allow rape to be covered up by obfuscating, secret internal procedures that, at their most severe, expel the rapist and send him off to another campus? If you are a college rapist who had to transfer because some b!tch lost her sense of humor– fist bump, Bro!

Now we are getting down to our top turkeys…

3.  Our finalists for Big Turkey were hard to rank. In our #3 spot, we are taking out a student loan from Citicorp to send a turkey to every member of Congress who voted for a budget deal that added $17 billion to the Pell Grant program – and then virtually eliminated federally subsidized student loans for graduate and professional school. Because you really can be competitive in the global economy without doctors, lawyers, Ph.D.’s, social scientists, physicists, mathematicians………and anyone who says you can’t is a monkey’s uncle!

2.  While we are at it, let’s give the Bird to Representative Denny Rehberg (R-Montana), who spoke for his Tea Party pals when he called Pell Grants the “welfare of the 21st century.” You know, it’s one thing to turn the United States into what we are no longer supposed to call a Third World country, but it’s another thing entirely to decide that poor people are hanging on the public t!t when they try to go to school to raise themselves up. Rehberg is, by the way a graduate of not one but two public institutions that — given his age — I would guess cost him less than $5,000 in tuition and fees in total.  You know what $5,000 buys you now? One semester of in-state tuition at UT-Austin, and that is a very, very, smokin’ hot deal when it comes to flagship U tuition.

And now, our Big Bird of 2011 goes to — you guessed it:

Linda P.B. Katehi, Chancellor of the University of California-Davis who, days after an incident that shocked almost everyone but Newt Gingrich, is now claiming that the police who coolly pepper sprayed peacefully assembled student protesters disobeyed her instructions. Let’s go to the video tape to hear the agonized screams for which Katehi is not responsible:

 

Our holiday season entertainment will be to see how many underlings Katehi is able to throw under the bus before she is persuaded to resign. And on a final, happier note go here to learn how to prepare Martha Stewart’s Turkey Katehi!

Readers are invited to add their own 2011 Turkeys below.

This entry was posted in academic publishing, Archives, bleeping conservatives, higher education, Tea Party Time, the Radical Addresses Her Public, University of California. Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • http://bonalibro.us Bonalibro

    A quick check of my dictionary tells me the koi (love) and yokan (premonition) with the possessive particle no between them translates as love’s premonition or premonition of love. Probably the equivalent is love at first sight. 

  • mbelvadi

    Your NVYW movement won’t solve the NPR problem, however. It’s not just NPR; CBC radio guests do the same.
    Whether the response “no problem” is appropriate or not would seem to me to depend on what one is being thanked for.  If I give a ride home to a colleague with a broken car, and their home is on my way home, and they thank me as I drop them off, I think it’s appropriate to acknowledge that they think they inconvenienced me and that I didn’t feel inconvenienced, thereby implying that they should feel free to ask again in the future without guilt – I’ll often expand to “no problem – any time”. “You’re welcome” seems to accept the premise that “yes you did inconvenience me and thus I am deserving of your gratitude” which is not the message I want to leave them with. Saying “no problem” in response to a waiter thanking me for a tip, on the other hand, makes no sense, and “you’re welcome” still seems the right option semantically.

  • QuiHai

    It would be hilarious if the law of unintended consequences was enforced such that this becomes the new standard on NPR: “Thank you.” “Don’t mention it. You will make me angry if you do.”

  • dank48

    Oh, I don’t know. How about French “De rien” and German “Nichts zu danken”? And, come to that, speaking as one who was taught to say “You’re welcome,” what’s so specially appropriate about “You’re welcome”?

    Actually, I think the (perhaps rural midwestern) variation of “Thank you” I grew up hearing is in its own way more expressive of the sentiment: “Much obliged” was the more usual form, often somewhat slurred, although I’ve heard, in more deliberate contexts, “I’m much obliged to you.” The response was usually little more than a shake of the head, as if in denial of the obligation: really not too far from “Don’t mention it.”

    • jffoster

      ;Much obliged’ as an expression of gratitude was also extremely common in the transMississippi mid and upper South in the 40s, 50s, and at least early 60s.

  • rthezel

    Don’t forget the nearly universal New Zealand response, “No worries,” usually sung do-do-fa with the implication of a question mark, much in the style of our own Pacific northwest under-40 population.  (But let’s not get started on declarative sentences that conclude with inflective question marks?)

  • http://twitter.com/HeadyHeathen Not You

    My least favorite response to a thank you is, “Mmm hmm.” These days I’m just happy if someone says, “You’re welcome.”

  • jffoster

    Mildly annoyed with “No problem”  I too have been.   But I knew that we of my ilk had lost when one day I heard an older teen~young adult native Welsh speaker reply to

    “Diolch yn fawr!”    ‘ Thanks greatly!” 

    not with the usual “Croeso!”     ‘Welcome / Welcoming!” 

    but with 

    “Dim problem!”      “No problem!”

    And I thought — Oh no, not the Welsh too!

  • not4nothin

    It sounds like you need a “Chill Pill” Ben.  You can have one of mine.  Don’t mention it.

    What twists my boxers is no response whatsoever.  I see someone juggling their cell phone, coffee, books and backpack as they approach the doors at the entrance/exit as I’m approaching.  I open the door and step aside.  The juggler sweeps through, without a word, a glance, or any recognition whatsoever. 

    Oh well, that’s life in the Big City.

    • 22273509

      This seems about right for a mindless zombie to do, whether it lives in a big city or not.

  • http://www.facebook.com/SixWingedSeraph Charles Wells

    In Minneapolis, “no problem” seems to have disappeared.  I am hearing “OK” more often.  On the other hand, in the last few years I have been in the hospital several times in both the Twin Cities and in Cleveland, and the nearly invariable response from the nurses, etc, was “You’re welcome”.  I expect that is the result of training. 

    • LynMinn

      I must stay in St. Paul more than I thought. “No prob” and “No worries” are still every day currency on this side of the river, and I’ve actually begun saying what Ben Yagoda only imagines: “Oh! Good. I hadn’t imagined it would be a problem.” To Ben for letting me know I’m not alone in my crankiness, I can only say “Thank you, thank you, thank you.” Next column, please: just what not4nothin says above: no “thank you,” no response at all, and the door approacher who sweeps through whether you’ve stepped aside or not.

  • cleverclogs

    I’m concerned about how the NVYW movement would show up in emails. I foresee something like:

    #nod/winkyface

  • ulyssesmsu

    Could not agree more, Ben. Great article. For whatever reason, the latest generation or 2 are not being taught courteous behavior–manners.

  • cfcclibrary

    I never really understood why we say, “You’re welcome.”  You are welcome to what?  What am I welcoming you to?  Am I welcoming your thank-you?  Am I saying that your thank-you is somehow acceptable or pleasing?  If I am not welcoming your thank-you, am I welcoming the person to whom I’m extending the greeting?  It has always seemed to me like a meaningless retort and one said more out of obligation or conformity…or just as a conversation closer.

    • jffoster

      Quick guess, which may be in error and you might want to check the OED, but  I suggest it means that “You are well come here, (and to whatever you’ve just thanked me for.)  Remember that even into the 17th century, ‘come’ was one of those English (and still is in German) verbs conjugated with the auxiliary BE rather than HAVE.   So Jesus in the KJV says “I am come that ye might …..” and the angels sang “The Lord is come….”.    
         In German it’s _Wilkommen!_ but it only means that Sie wohl hergekommen sind.  that ‘You well hither come are.”.   For “You’re welcome” responding to a ‘Thank you.”, German says
      “Bitte.”, i.e. “Please.”    “Please.” was also common in Cincinnati English, especially on the West Side, until about the turn of the century and can still be heard among older West Siders.

  • marcleavitt

    No problem in English is a teeth clencher for me, but not its literal translation in French, Italian and Spanish. Why? Beats me. When people thank me, I often say “Thank YOU!”

  • russlwhit

    An additional annoyance from those who do use the traditional phrase is that they get it wrong. Listen carefully and you will hear “you welcome” instead of “you’re welcome.”

  • http://twitter.com/flutist319 flutist319

    My problem with “You’re welcome” is that I feel like it sends the message “Yeah, that’s right, you SHOULD be thanking me.” (Holy diachronic semantic change, Batman!) So I, too, am a mostly non-verbal thanks-acknowledger.

  • MarjoryMunson

    How about this – in the civility series “Thank you,” “You’re welcome,” NO following response is needed. We need to learn when to simply shut up. Otherwise this conversation becomes the kid game of having to be the last one to say “Good bye.”

  • catlkelley

    I am married to a person from Ireland and when I first met his family was surprised when I realized that the phrase “you’re welcome” was rarely used as a response to “thank you.” instead it is used very often to welcome a person into a home. It is usually phrased “you are very welcome.” i like this a lot .. It feels genuinely warm and welcoming.

    I fInd any response to “thank you” to be acceptable as long as it is genuine. The only responses I don’t like are a blank stare or “uh huh,” “mm hmmm” as mentioned above. These responses demonstrate resentment rather than a willingness to help. The implied message is “yeah, you ought to thank me.”

  • missoularedhead

    Given all the turkeys this year, it must have been hard to put together this list! 

  • glasspen

    Excellent list; bumper crop of candidates this year.

    Item on UT-Austin tuition fueled a trip down Memory Lane.  When I was in law school there, in-state tuition was $4/credit hour…it went up to $6/credit hour (we were outraged).  Mandatory fees were a couple hundred more per term.  For this vast sum we got, among other things, Mark Yudof (before he was even a dean) teaching “Educational Policy and the Law”.  Some would say you get what you pay for; I say it was worth every penny.

    Happy Turkey Day.

  • Guest

    You write with such style, I almost forget that you’re a contemptible clueless leftist ideologue. I’ll do my own list with Dan Savage, Rachel Maddow, Al Sharpton, Joe Biden, and Arianna Huffington in the top ten.

    Happy thanksgiving, Claire!!! Rest up from all the work you’ve put into forcing your readers to think.

  • historiann

    This is terrific.  I figured that Kathei would be #1.  I agree with you that the question is “how many underlings Katehi is able to throw under the bus before she is persuaded to resign?”  She’s toast, but I guess it’s going to take some time before she recgonizes that she cannot govern that campus any longer.

    Thanks also for including Charlotte Allen and the link to her description of her talk at Wesleyan.  I read the whole column and the 6 comments, which I especially appreciated.  One commenter asked how chanting “no mean yes, yes means anal” exemplifies conservative values, and another one asked why these fine young men have to hide behind her skirts. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1384960208 David Salmanson

    While I’m in basic agreement about #10, the prosecutor works for Nassau County but the school districts are completely independent of each other.  I count 53 completely independent school districts and that’s counting the three Valley Stream districts as one.  It’s pretty easy to jack the system when every school is doing it’s own thing.  

    • tenured_radical

      It’s pretty easy to jack the system when the testing companies are profit-driven too, and when the schools themselves have so much at stake in having their students score well.  Probably worth adding that this is but one of *many* incidents this year which demonstrate how our overreliance on testing is producing endemic corruption among test-takers and those who monitor the tests.

  • captain_chronicle

    Hi Claire – a delightful read but could have been stronger if you’d have poked some libs in the eye.

    Uh, excuse me miss, but your bias is showing! :-)

    • tenured_radical

      Do Barack Obama and Arne Duncan count, Miss?  More importantly, must sorting all things into the categories of “liberal” and “conservative” be a preoccupation?  I have been fascinated by the ways the Penn State folks are read as “conservative” even though I doubt conservatives would agree that accused child molesters and those who shield them are a constituency.

  • cnathenson

    And let’s add an “honorary turkey” (maybe just some of the choice
    leftovers?) to the Chronicle, for its prudish editing of words as common
    as “tit.” This is a website with content that is of little interest to
    minors, who in any case would know what “f^ck” stands for. How about we
    all just agree that we are grown ups who use grown up words?

    • tenured_radical

      It’s not the Chron who does that — it’s me.  Mashup language is common to the blogosphere, and often used to call attention to the word, not censor it. I think perhaps the Chron readership is not so familiar w/ bloggery as it is practiced “out there” but keep reading and you wlll be.

  • tisha

    However meritorious the objects of ridicule might be, it’s disheartening to read something in the Chronicle with so many obvious grammatical errors. 

    • geochaucer

      Didn’t see a one of them, Tisha, and I’ve been an English professor for 30 years.  I’m not saying there mightn’t be some in the piece, but one has to be fairly inclined to notice them.  You might find Joseph Williams’ classic article “The Phenomenology of Error” interesting in this regard.

      • tenured_radical

        Thanks @geochaucer — and @trisha, we bloggers work without copy editors or proofreaders, and we work fast.  Welcome to the blogosphere, a land of error, mashup and rude commentary.  For heaven’s sakes, Mrs. Lincoln — how was the play?

  • minnesotan

    This all seems kind of petty. I think you’ve missed the entire point of the holiday, when we (of all people!) should be giving thanks for the privileged positions we occupy.

    • tenured_radical

      Is celebrating the conquest of North America really more important than addressing key questions in education policy and public life? Discuss.

      • minnesotan

        That’s really what you think the holiday is about? Celebrating conquest? I think your perspective is terribly skewed. You seem to be a very negative, angry person.

        I pity you.

        • tenured_radical

          Get a grip. It’s a blog, not Jerry Springer.

  • lairdwilcox

    I’m not seeing anything particularly funny about this and I’m wondering why it appears in the Chronicle of Higher Education.  Other places, maybe. 

    • tenured_radical

      Well I don’t see anything particularly relevant about your comment, and yet, here it is in the Chronicle of Higher Education. Why not try to respond to the real issues raised in the post, or move on to another blog to leave trenchant comments like this one?

  • Prof_truthteller

    Thank you this is hilarious. Sometimes there’s so much sh!t going on you just have to laugh to keep from crying. I appreciate all your great comebacks on the comments, too.

    However, I disagree on Katehi- I think they’ll keep her-  or- she’ll move on to a (even higher paying) consultancy or lobbying gig.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/IUPEAKY5ZU4ZFM6KNP4BFS4MXQ Anson

    Not just on NPR, but on the PBS News Hour, too. I grew up with “You’re welcome,” and I’m staying with it. Some of the more modern responses just seem rude.

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037