Previous:
Next:

The pain of revising manuscripts

October 18, 2011, 12:53 pm

Kitten sleeping by a laptop

A well-deserved rest after submitting a manuscript.

My favorite moment of research is right after I hit the “submit” button on a journal’s article submission website. I can breathe a sigh of relief, knowing that I don’t have to worry about that project for a few weeks or months. I move the folder with all of the paper’s files out of my “active research” folder on my computer and into my “in review” folder. I can take the whole category off of my to-do list. Sure, having a paper accepted is a lovely moment too, but for some reason that first moment after submission is extra-special to me.

But the manuscripts always come back to you, which is my least favorite moment in research. Whenever I see that email in my inbox with the words “Decision on manuscript…” in the title, my chest tightens and I brace myself for the result. There are generally three possible outcomes for a first-time submission:

  1. flat-out rejection with lots of reviewer comments
  2. revise-and-resubmit decision with major revisions, that will go out for review again when you resubmit
  3. revise-and-resubmit decision with minor revisions, that will probably be accepted by the editor without further review when you resubmit

It might seem like #1 is the worst outcome, but I prefer it to #2. After all, you aren’t required to respond to reviewer comments if you’re going to turn around and send it to a different journal.

I am currently in the midst of a major revision for a paper that I absolutely can’t stand. I’ve been working on it for 5 years. I’ve sent it to 4 journals. Frankly, I’d love to just delete all of the files related to this paper and move on with my life. It doesn’t really have any bearing on any of my other research. But I got a number of small research grants to do this work in the first place, so I feel like it is my responsibility to get it published, no matter how painful.

The 4th journal gave me a revise-and-resubmit decision, with major revisions. And they are quite major. For the first time in my life, I had to request an extension… and the new deadline is coming up in a week. I’m almost done, but every minute I spend working on this stupid manuscript is painful. Hate, hate, hate. The only way I’ve managed to get through it is to break down the tasks associated with the revision into the tiniest possible tasks.

I cannot wait until this manuscript is out of my hands again. Of course, then I have ANOTHER R&R to work on… sigh.

I much prefer the fun of writing brand-new manuscripts. Sure, they’ve got their own problems, but at least no one has criticized your hard work just yet.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

  • Print
  • Comment
  • dumbledog1992

    Although I am in a liberal arts discipline myself, isn’t it the case that the vast majority of students enrolled in higher ed are enrolled in degree programs that have a almost direct correlation with the real world job market: business, nursing, engineering, natural resource management, etc., etc. While each of these field do undoubtedly have bigger and broader abstract principles, etc. that students need, much of their time in these majors (if the students in my GE classes are to be believed) is spent thinking about and training (conscious use of this word) for the current job market. And since the ability to get a job “after” is what these programs and the universities that offer them (pretty much all of us) have sold to students, we pretty at least do a good job of it. So, we are already where Mary and Mike don’t want us to be. Sorry guys, we’re already there.

    But even so, I’m with “janniaragon”, even those of us in the liberal arts in our roles as adivsors have a role to play here in helping studnents with career planning — even if it’s only listening. From my own point of view, I’d like to dispel the notion suggested in the blog that faculty don’t know anything about the “real” world of work, that we are trained to do only one thing. Jeez, isn’t that the problem in many respects (esp. when the “one thing” is so incredibly narrow). I for one had a so-called “real” career (or at least a starter career for a few years right after college that allows me to talk with students about the first steps of a job search and what one is looking for in a career) before getting my Ph.D. and many of us have spouses and siblings, etc. that give us some glimpse outside the ivory tower.

    Sorry, the “not my job” attitude on display here doesn’t work for me. Yes, there are clearly offices on campus that do much of the job/career related counseling better than I do or ever will – and part of my job is to make sure students get there. But, there’s a whole lot I can do (and do do) to help students is just listen — and in addition to strengthening their imaginations and critical thinking skills, run my classroom like a workplace in the sense that I expect them to be “professional” in demeanor and orientation (show up on time, hand in papers when they are due, not when students feel like handing them in, take pride in the “neatness and completeness” of their work). You’d be surprised about how much we do with students prepares them for work without us getting involved in their individual career choices.

  • beverlyhamilton

    I think Career Services is also more than just providing job leads and coaching students on their skills to get the job. There is a huge benefit to talking with someone who was in the field and can tell you about the day in, day out aspects of a particular career. Hearing that from a full-time faculty member in my discipline is more meaningful than from someone in Career Services who likely did not work in that area. Faculty members also provide context and insider information that people outside the field are unlikely to know. While not “Career Services” per se, this kind of faculty advising is invaluable and overlooked.

  • mhick255

    I’m with psel8105. Doesn’t the role of faculty in job preparation depend greatly on the department, the class, and the student’s major? If I’m a mechanical engineering major, my classes had better have some real-world applicability.

    I have a friend who majored in elementary education, but he’s totally wrong for that line of work. Sure enough, he was never able to get a job as a teacher, despite graduating with an elementary ed. degree and years of trying. I’m very disappointed that none of his professors or student teacher supervisors ever pulled him aside and suggested he find another path. Instead, they gave him passing grades, which he interpreted as meaning he was adequately prepared. Even in less pragmatic disciplines, there are usually classes targeted toward career prep, such as Intro to Business Writing in English departments.

    Faculty shouldn’t be expected to have personal experience in other careers – they already have a career of their own – but if their classes relate to specific career paths or job skills, they should stay current on the career environment and build professional relationships with non-academics to whom they could refer students. That would be a great way for the faculty and administration to work together, since the administration will have connections to alumni or community members outside of academia.

  • coachhillary

    I agree with this statement: “To ask faculty to pinch-hit as career coaches is a disservice to students and a poor use of faculty time..” I work with faculty to advance their own careers, and while faculty can be a huge resource for students, especially in the context of “informational interviews” about what it’s like to work in their field, what they find interesting or exciting in their “real world” counterparts, faculty should not be primarily responsible for this kind of entry-to-the-market preparation, in my opinion.

  • vysmith2

    I agree that the responsibility should not SOLELY be on the faculty, but faculty is part of the community that supports the student in preparation for the field. Yes, there is a distinction between teaching/learning and job placement, but in this day and age, students must be more resourceful than ever especially when they don’t have the 2 -3 years ‘experience’ required for entry into the field. To this degree, I would expect that a faculty member be more of a ‘specialist’ to provide insight about possible career expectations and options, but not job placement.

    This may contradict a bit of what I just stated, but it would be helpful for faculty members to connect with their professional community practitioners. This helps to provide real-world examples that illuminate the text. Additionally, remaining connected to the field also means hearing information about possible work study, internships, volunteer organizations, and study abroad opportunities that may benefit that under-exposed student. Note: Please check those tear-offs that have been posted to your office door and bulletin board for the past 10 years…..

    Please keep in mind that many students may be first-generation college students and don’t have the legacy to build on otherwise. The ‘tip’ that you provide may be the assistance they need that propels them to be top in YOUR field – with thanks and gratitude to you for taking the time.

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037