But logistically, how is this thing supposed to work? The state accuses someone of terrorism. If the state waits until after he is convicted, then stripping him of his citizenship is a novel punishment, but not one that would affect how the trial proceeds or the rights the accused would have until the trial. (And it creates more problems, too; what do you do with a stateless terrorist? Start deportation proceedings after prison? Where to?)
If the state doesn’t wait, then the mere suspicion of terrorism is enough to… start legal proceedings to remove someone’s citizenship… so he can… be tried without constitutional protections? Taken away to be tortured because the magical Miranda fairy dust makes it impossible to interrogate the guy or get him to confess? (Both of which happened with the Miracle-Gro bomber, here, but let’s not confuse the issue with the facts.) I’m assuming that’s the line of thinking here.
We’re supposed to start years of legal proceedings to remove someone’s citizenship (because of course Lieberman isn’t suggesting something as stupid as revoking citizenship based on an indictment, right? Right?) so we then know how to proceed with the investigation? And that’s supposed to help us get more information faster all like Jack Bauer in minute 59 of the hour?
Here’s what the law is now. Note the little clause in §1481(a). I suspect that one could commit treason and be executed a citizen.