Posts by Gene C. Fant Jr.
April 20, 2012, 02:15 PM ET
A Few Thoughts on a Graceful Exit
Every academic leader dreads the next
few weeks: resignation season. Contracts are out, but so are offers
to job applicants. Nothing creates fear in administrators during
these final weeks of the semester quite like the request for a
meeting with no explanation or obvious reason. Late-semester
resignations mean either quick searches or one-year appointments,
or worse yet, overloads for existing personnel. As a dean, I've
always appreciated resignations that have been handled well. The
person has been upfront and has tried to give us as much lead time
as possible. In some cases, there has been an offer of assistance
in jump-starting a search or even in teaching a course over the
summer to smooth the transition. Nothing is quite as discouraging
as an ill-conceived departure, especially when colleagues are being
left behind at a troubled unit or institution. No need to brag
about higher...
Read More
January 12, 2012, 02:14 PM ET
Champagne Wishes and Caviar Dreams
July 12, 2011, 09:46 AM ET
House Hunters, Academic Style
October 6, 2010, 11:52 AM ET
Teaching, Research, Sucker—I Mean—Service
I spoke with a former student not long ago who is completing a
doctorate and pondering the job market. He mentioned that he had
volunteered to serve on some departmental committees so that he
would have something under "service" on his CV.
I remember that same advice coming from my professors: If you
volunteer for service, then search committees will know that you
understand the realities of life in the professoriate and maybe
even something about departmental politics.
After my conversation with the former student, I started pondering
how often I have actually looked at the "service" section of an
applicant's résumé. Indeed, after serving on search committees for
the better part of two decades, I can't remember an applicant's
"service" ever coming up in our deliberations for entry-level
faculty positions (although for chairmanship searches, it's one of
the first things to be discussed...
October 4, 2010, 11:44 AM ET
Tenure Track? What Tenure Track?
Discussions about tenure have reached fever pitch, whether the
portrayal of public-school tenure in the film Waiting for
Superman or politically inspired criticism of higher
education's tenure policies or sound-bite scrutiny by the news
media. We are about to enter a season of significant change in how
tenure works.
I was talking about this recently with a friend who had served as
an administrator at a college that offers multiyear contracts
rather than tenure. He told me that when job candidates found out
that there was no tenure track there, they routinely pulled out of
their interviews or contract negotiations. That presented a
significant challenge, he said, especially in competitive
disciplines.
Given the current state of the job market, would a lack of tenure
at an institution change how you pursue a position?
September 27, 2010, 10:56 AM ET
On Being Distinctive
Not long ago, I was handed a file that included a faculty
application from about 1970. What was fascinating was to see how it
has changed since then. My favorite line was the one with "height"
and "weight." I actually laughed out loud when I read that.
As I pondered the application form, I also remembered something one
of my doctoral professors told me about generating my CV. "Try to
find a way to make your personality stand out: Include something
interesting or distinctive, perhaps in your 'Interests' section, at
the end. Everyone says 'film, reading, and travel,' so avoid those.
I personally like to see something about baseball in that
spot."
I thought this was a little odd—until I'd sat on enough search
committees to hear the utter joy at seeing "gourmet cooking" listed
as an interest. I thought one colleague would actually burst into
tears at a résumé that mentioned "prolific...
September 22, 2010, 10:48 AM ET
And the Honor of Serving Goes to . . .
Across academe, search committees are being established in anticipation of job announcements. The composition of these committees is often a matter of policy, with specific guidelines about who will serve (the ratio of men/women and senior/junior faculty members, and the representation from other units, from underrepresented populations, and from human resources).
Searches are hard, and the duties are not to be taken lightly.
They can become fraught with political challenges as well. For many
deans and department chairs, the empaneling of search committees is
among the most complicated decisions they must make. As I have
noted previously in this space, there is a saying that is pretty
accurate: First-rate search committees hire first-rate candidates;
second-rate committees hire third-rate candidates.
What is the best way to establish a search committee? How large
should a committee be?...
September 17, 2010, 11:10 AM ET
Branch Applications
Many universities have regional campuses that distribute
academic programs across large geographical areas. At one time, the
advice commonly given to job applicants was that they avoid
teaching at such locations. The primary concern was that for
tenure-track positions, it was almost impossible to achieve tenure
without either "face-time" at the main campus department (which
would one day vote on the bid) or with the higher-on-average
teaching loads that regional campuses tend to have. A secondary
concern was that regional campuses tend to be more
enrollment-sensitive and that positions might be more volatile in
terms of permanence.
Administrators at regional campuses seem to have common concerns
about applicants as well. Do prospective faculty members understand
the role and scope of the campus? Are they merely using the
position as a stepping stone to another position elsewhere?
Search...
September 13, 2010, 03:51 PM ET
'I Know That Candidate by Reputation'
In my most recent
post, I asked how the public airing of departmental or
institutional turmoil might influence a prospective candidate's
actions. Now I'll extend that in the other direction.
Two senior professors, who served on a search committee together,
were flipping through CV's over coffee.
Professor Jones said, "I like this dossier from Big Name University
(one of the top 10 in their field). I'd love to have someone from
there with us."
Professor Smith countered, "Yes, but that department is falling
apart. The university has put it in receivership, and the place is
rife with infighting. Have you read the stories in The
Chronicle? There's even a Web site dedicated to the problems.
I don't know that we need to bring in someone who has seen that
kind of attitude during the doctorate. We shouldn't risk ruining
the peace we have by hiring someone who has learned the politics
of...
September 9, 2010, 03:44 PM ET
Which Foot Shall I Shoot Next?
A campus was suffering through a significant economic struggle,
which included a midyear budget cut. At a meeting with the
university's leaders, who were growing impatient with the process
of the cuts and with the lack of clear information about the
situation, the institution's president declared, "No one should
discuss these things off campus. If there is one thing that neither
donors nor prospective students want to hear, it's that there are
financial problems here. Donors won't give to problems, and
prospective students are afraid of them. If we lose either of those
groups, our problem will only grow worse."
That conversation happened over a decade ago, before everyone
figured out that information can find new and expansive homes on
the Internet. It is almost impossible now to create an information
lockdown, especially with the easy availability of Web sites where
information,...

