February 2, 2012, 12:13 PM ET
Do You Have Any Questions for Us?
Like a lot of job
seekers this month, I am spending much of my time now preparing for
interviews. This means not only anticipating possible questions
about my teaching and scholarship, but also thoroughly scrutinizing
the universities and their search committees. I want to be able to
reference specific ways in which the current faculty's research
intersects with my own work and to articulate precisely how I might
add something to the particular department/program. This kind of
preparation is relatively straightforward. The questions are
predictable and in most cases department Web sites with faculty
biographies make it easy for job seekers to learn about past and
ongoing projects. What I am finding more difficult to prepare for,
though, are those last 5 to 10 minutes of the conversation when the
tables are turned and the applicant is asked what questions he or
she has for the...
Read More
February 1, 2012, 10:44 AM ET
Libertarians vs. Authoritarians
Who knew how
polarizing the issue of classroom management could be? I certainly
didn't, until I read the comments on my December Two-Year Track
column, "The
Rules about Classroom Rules." Clearly, there are two distinct
schools of thought regarding how best to manage one's teaching
environment: the "libertarian" approach, which basically allows
students to behave more or less as they like as long as they're not
disturbing others, and what I'll call (at the risk of much
additional abuse) the "authoritarian" approach, which calls for
strict rules and swift punishments. Consider the very first
response to my column, a long and (I thought) rather nasty comment
in which the writer basically accused me of being single-handedly
responsible for the decay of America's youth because I don't snatch
up students' cell phones whenever I see them texting in class. My
reply, I admit, was hardly kinder ...
Read More
January 31, 2012, 11:39 AM ET
Please Don't List Me as a Reference
January 30, 2012, 11:43 AM ET
Faculty Working Conditions Are Student Learning Conditions
We've found a
forum here and elsewhere online to finally open some conversations
about contingent faculty issues. On individual campuses it is hard
to find time or opportunity to talk through these things in any
meaningful way. At the New Faculty Majority Summit this weekend
we've tried to shy away from the airing of grievances, no matter
how valid, and focus on ways to move forward. That's where I've
been stuck--knowing the problems is just the beginning and I
haven't known how to do more. A theme for the NFM is the title of
this post and something that I think we need to emphasize in any
discussion with the broader public about why they should care about
our problems; after all, jobs are tough to find all over. Why does
contingent faculty even matter? It matters not just to me and you
and the other 800,000 non-tenure-track faculty across America. It
matters to everyone who will take a...
Read More
January 27, 2012, 04:16 PM ET
Some Notes on Thank You's
January 26, 2012, 11:20 AM ET
Fear No Eval
A confession: this fall, compiling application dossiers in evidence of my teaching effectiveness, I read my students' evaluations for the first time in over two years. It's not that I've avoided feedback; during that period I've had my teaching regularly reviewed by graduate faculty and peers whose notes have been greatly appreciated. Nor is it that I am particularly thin-skinned in the face of criticism. Rather, I think I began avoiding student evaluations after my first semesters as a teacher because they simply baffled me and I felt I was spending altogether too much of my teaching energy worried about how I was being graded. What exactly did it mean when one student simply wrote, "Did not learn a thing. Terrible.," and then, in the standardized portion of the form, checked that he or she agreed that the instructor "stimulated student learning"? This particular evaluation came from a...
Read MoreJanuary 25, 2012, 02:46 PM ET
Adjunct Moneyball
I watched
Moneyball recently. It's about how the Oakland A's changed
the way Major League Baseball teams spend money on players. A scene
early in the movie shows a bunch of scouts sitting around a table
with the team's general manager, Billy Beane (played by Brad Pitt).
Beane has just learned that his three star players were bought by
richer teams and that the A's won't give him money to buy big
talent. In the scene, the scouts are talking about potential
players, commenting on things like throwing styles and athletic
build and heart. Beane stops them, saying they talk too much about
useless things. They don't understand the problem, he says, which
is that, in the league, "There are rich teams and there are poor
teams, then there's 50 feet of crap, and then there's us."
According to the movie, baseball had become about money and it was
unfair for teams that didn't have money. So teams, ...
Read More
January 24, 2012, 02:36 PM ET
Student Envy
January 23, 2012, 02:31 PM ET
Are Your References Reliable?
January 20, 2012, 03:17 PM ET

