“History, if used as a depository for more than anecdote or
chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of
science by which we are now possessed.” This opening sentence, of
one of the most important books of the twentieth century, is
undoubtedly the reason why I emoted so irritably on reading my
fellow philosopher Alex Rosenberg’s approving quotation of Henry
Ford’s opinion that “history is bunk.” The book of course is Thomas
Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, and this
year we are celebrating its 50th anniversary. I first read it in 1966, and I still
remember how forcibly it struck me. Suddenly studying the nature of
science had a whole new exciting dimension and I was not going to
miss out on it. At once, I was led to reading Charles Darwin’s
Origin of Species, and later this year I shall celebrate
this fact by bringing out (as editor) ...Read More
The recent media firestorm over the whiteness of the HBO series
Girls is somewhat puzzling for two reasons: One, why pick
on Girls when so much of television is glaringly white and
two, why be surprised that a show set in New York City could still
lack racial diversity? Girls is being bashed for being
all-white because it is at least not yet another show written by
men about women. As
Mauren Ryan writes over at the Huffington Post,
women and people of color, who are often treated as the
tokens they usually are, are typically the junior members of a
writing staff, hardly able to challenge those around them and push
for the kind of stories that would reflect their lives and
worldviews more accurately.
In other words, shows like How I Met Your Mother are
forgiven their whiteness because they are not breaking through the
glass ceiling in terms of who is writing the show. The other
question...
Read More
Right at the moment I am reading a very interesting book,
Conceived in Doubt: Religion and Politics in the New American
Nation, by a colleague, Amanda Porterfield. She is tackling a
problem that has long puzzled me, how was it that a nation founded
by deists (even those ostensibly Christian tended to avoid taking
communion and that sort of thing) could become so fervently
evangelical by, let us say, about 1840 (although in fact it
happened earlier than that). I will talk about the book itself at a
later date, but now I want to puzzle about the hold that this
idiosyncratic form of Protestantism still has on so many Americans.
I am tempted to say simply that religion ruins everything. I know
that that is not true. My Quaker childhood was surrounded by people
who sincerely tried to do good because of their Christian faith.
But when I see the nastiness – hostility to women, to gays and...
Read More
Merging commonsensical prose, sardonic wit and a broad knowledge of
science, Natalie Angier writes smart, delightful essays about
science. Like Brainstorm’s David Barash, she likes to
connect the dots between animal and human behavior. In a
recent column in The New York Times, “The Spirit of
Sisterhood Is in the Air and on the Air,” Angier argues that when
it comes to sisterly camaraderie, the young women on HBO’s new hit
series Girls behave, in essentials, exactly like female
elephants, chimps, baboons, and monkeys. Angier points to a number
of scientific studies demonstrating that girlfriends are hardly
unique to Homo sapiens. Adult females in many other parts of the
animal kingdom bond together in tight social units where they help
out one another, hang out with one another, and most importantly,
lend emotional support to one another. The young highly educated
post-grads on...
Read More
Dearest ATS, Congratulations: It's a BOOK! Your 273-page
volume--the weighty, serious, mighty tome--is sitting in the center
of my cluttered desk. Since it's bigger than everything else around
it (how small and slight those 20-page student papers look in
comparison!), I can't miss it. It'll be there tomorrow when we all
meet to perform the one-to-two-hour ritual during which you
"defend" your work to your advisers, your committee members, and
your colleagues. One of my favorite New Yorker cartoons,
photocopied and given away to friends and students so often over
the years I no longer have a version, was of a woman reaching
across a seminar table and socking a guy in the eye in front of six
well-dressed adults, with one of them commenting to the group
"Excellent defense. Let's give her the doctorate!" It won't be like
that tomorrow, I promise. You've already won this race; now
there's...
Read More
Today's
episode of Faith
Complex was conceived in the aftermath of a disturbing crime
which has received comparatively little play in the national media.
In broad outline, the case involves the brutal murder of an
Iraqi-born American citizen and mother of five, Shaima Alawadi, in
her home near San Diego. There are conflicting reports
regarding a note found near the victim's body (Ms. Alawadi died
three days after the attack). In
some versions, it reads: "This is my country. Go back to yours,
terrorist." The initial reaction to this matter was that it was a
hate crime aimed at a Muslim-American woman whose wearing of the
hijab drew conspicuous attention to her identity. As our
interviewer and our guest, Dr.
Jerusha Lamptey, make clear, however, there is no definitive
evidence that this was in fact a hate crime. In recent weeks,
commentators have questioned the idea that this was an ...
Read More
I don’t mean the dilemma faced by psychopaths, but the
dilemma presented to us by them. Whether called
psychopaths or sociopaths (the terms are essentially synonymous),
the reality is that there is a certain proportion of the
population—and as far as can be told, this is true of pretty much
every population—who fit the diagnostic bill. Of these, the most
recent and horrifying example is Anders Breivik, currently on trial
for murdering 77 Norwegians (most of them children) in July, 2011.
His trial has riveted the customarily placid citizens of Norway, as
well as many others around the world. From a distance, at least, it
is abundantly clear that Mr. Breivik is a 100-percent,
dyed-in-the-wool psychopath, a category of mental illness that is
extraordinarily troublesome, in at least three ways: (1)
Psychopaths, who appear to make up roughly 1-2 percent of the
population, are...
Read More
Of all the news about the ballooning college debt in this
country--now said to top a trillion dollars--none has depressed me
more than this piece in
last week's Wall Street Journal. It's perhaps not
surprising but all of that debt is influencing other life decisions
young adults are making. Sure, we joke about how 20-somethings move
back to Mom and Dad's basement to save money. But these are people
who are putting off marriage and having kids in order to pay
off loans. Here's the start of the piece:
Between the ages of 18 and 22, Jodi Romine took out $74,000 in
student loans to help finance her business-management degree at
Kent State University in Ohio. What seemed like a good investment
will delay her career, her marriage and decision to have
children.Ms. Romine's $900-a-month loan payments
eat up 60% of the paycheck she earns as a bank teller in Beaufort,
S.C., the best job...Read More
Jonathan Haidt's research and writings have received ample notice
in recent months, including this
profile in The Chronicle, this
upcoming panel at American Enterprise Institute, and this
article by Haidt in Reason
Magazine. One reason is that Haidt and colleagues
have designed studies that attempt to measure differences between
conservatives and liberals, and the results have been newsworthy.
Among his premises is the identification of six pairings of "moral
concerns," namely, care/harm, fairness/cheating,
liberty/oppression, loyalty/betrayal, authority/subversion, and
sanctity/degradation. One of the applications of those
pairings is a study that Haidt describes in Reason this
way: "In a study I conducted with colleagues Jesse Graham and Brian
Nosek, we tested how well liberals and conservatives could
understand each other. We asked more than 2,000 American visitors
to fill out...
Read More
A guest post by Lilian Radovac. (BTW, SoCal readers may want to
know that Marc is speaking at UC-Irvine a 4 p.m. 4/23 on New Media/New Protests.) On an
unseasonably warm day in late March, a quarter of a million postsecondary students and their
supporters gathered in the streets of Montreal to protest against
the Liberal government’s plan to raise tuition fees by 75% over
five years. As the crowd marched in seemingly endless waves from Place du Canada, dotted with the
carrés rouges, or red squares, that have become
the symbol of the Quebec student movement, it was plainly obvious
that this demonstration was the largest in Quebec’s, and perhaps
Canadian, history. The March 22nd Manifestation nationale was not the culmination
but the midpoint of a 10-week-long student uprising that has seen,
at its height, over 300,000 college and university students join an
unlimited and...
Read More
directs the program in history and philosophy of science at
Florida State University. His forthcoming book is Science and
Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science.