January 25, 2012, 05:31 PM ET
Where’s your diploma? Is it magisterially framed and displayed with
due pride and ceremony on your office wall? Is it part of a row of
impressive documents in your home, standing square-shouldered next
to your partner’s diploma, as if in a family portrait? Is it still
stuck inside the blue cardboard folder it came in somewhere under a
book in your parents’ library? Is it hanging in your bathroom,
behind a door, so that nobody ever sees it but you—and even when
you see it, you’re not exactly at your best? Or was it lost in a
move, burnt by an ex, peed on by your dog? Know those ads saying
“It’s 10 o’clock: do you know where your children are?” Well, it’s
2012: do you know where your diploma is? Do you care? The only
diploma I have framed is the
honorary doctor of humane letters
degree I received from Shepherd College in 2000. It never
occurred to me not to have...
Read More
January 24, 2012, 10:34 PM ET
According to a
piece in the Harvard Crimson: "Eric R. Brewster ’14 and Avery
A. Leonard ’14 fought off drooping eyelids and the urge to sleep
last week as they held a phone conversation that lasted for 46
hours, 12 minutes, 52 seconds, and 228 milliseconds—potentially
setting a new world record." Those wacky Harvard kids! Trying to
break world records in their spare time. But wait! This stunt is so
much more than that. It's an "art installation," according to the
organizers. It was actually "the premiere creation of the Harvard
Generalist, a new student arts cooperative." How was this art, you
might ask? "Stage Manager Ginny C. Fahs ’14 said that the
performance was much like an athletic competition because it
required extreme endurance from Leonard and Brewster. 'This
explored deterioration—physical, mental, and emotional,' Fahs said.
'Because of that deterioration, the...
Read More
January 24, 2012, 04:22 PM ET
For years, everything I believed about American politics could be
summed up in the following Gore Vidal bon mot:
America's not the only one party system, but it's the
only one party system with two right wings."
That more or less held true till the Dubbya years, when one of the
wings went so far right it was no longer accurately described as a
political party as much as a social movement fueled by Christian
conservatism and funded by corporate interests. Fortunately,
another political aphorism arrived just in time for the 2008
presidential election, this one by humorist David Sedaris, who
described people not committed to voting for Barack Obama
thusly:
I think of being on an airplane. The flight attendant
comes down the aisle with her food cart and, eventually, parks it
beside my seat. “Can I interest you in the chicken?” she asks. “Or
would you prefer the platter of s#$t with...
Read More
January 24, 2012, 06:09 AM ET
“Who can explain it, who can tell you why?
Fools give you reasons, wise men never try.” Well, I’m gonna try …
to tell you why sex exists. And not just on some enchanted evening
(or morning, afternoon, or middle of the night).
In my last post, I outlined some of the downsides of sex as a means
of reproducing. Having shared that bad news, here is its
antidote, the most likely biological upside of carnal unions: When
a random sample of one-half the genes of one parent is combined
with a comparable sample from another, each resulting offspring is
genetically different from either parent, as well as from one
another. It appears that therein resides the payoff of sex, in the
glorious and highly adaptive production of genetic diversity. Of
course, the fundamental source of said diversity is mutation but
mutations are rare, occurring on the order of once in a million or
so...
Read More
January 23, 2012, 11:22 PM ET
In comparison with
the recent ructions in South Carolina, tonight's GOP debate in
Florida was a fairly sedate gathering. Most of the sparks were
generated by a few solid Romney v. Gingrich scrums. The former,
reeling from recent lackluster debate performances, came out
kickboxing and tarred the latter as a Freddie Mac lobbyist, an
"influence peddler," a Washington Insider and a pretty damn
embarrassing failure as Speaker of the House. Gingrich, for his
part, repulsed the assaults, never losing his cool. Though at one
point, he did something unusual and expounded on Romney's debate
strategy: "
I understand your technique, which you used on
McCain, you used on Huckabee . . . " I can't recall the last
time I saw a candidate engage in an analysis of another's
rhetorical craft. Odd. But effective. Gingrich is becoming
formidable-r with each passing debate. The Speaker also played...
Read More
January 23, 2012, 03:38 PM ET
Last week, the International Center for Photography in New York
opened
an exhibition of works by the great street and crime
photographer Arthur Fellig (1899-1968), professionally known as
Weegee because of his Ouija-board prescience about arriving at
crime scenes so quickly. Also last week, Eastman Kodak—the company
that made the kind of film Weegee and other major modern
photographers relied on—declared
bankruptcy. The end of traditional film photography was augured
in the early 1990s, when digital cameras first started being sold,
but Kodak’s demise signals yet another step in the march to its
doom. It demonstrates that for all the darkroom holdouts, most
people today use digital cameras for their photographs. Face it,
darkroom fans, times have changed. Almost all images—including
paintings—sooner or later land in someone’s computer. The whole
world is pixelating, and hardly anybody...
Read More
January 23, 2012, 02:34 PM ET
Here is a
story in the
New York Times about an issue in higher
education writing assignments. It begins with Duke professor
Cathy Davidson's aim "to eradicate the term paper and replace it
with the blog." To Cathy, the long research paper is a
"mechanistic" practice that "is a real disincentive to creative but
untrained writers." Others weigh in and defend the term paper, such
as Douglas Reeves, founder of Harcourt's Leadership and Learning
Center, who says, “Writing term papers is a dying art, but those
who do write them have a dramatic leg up in terms of critical
thinking, argumentation and the sort of expression required not
only in college, but in the job market. It doesn’t mean there
aren’t interesting blogs. But nobody would conflate interesting
writing with premise, evidence, argument and conclusion.” And Will
Fitzhugh of the
Concord Review, who attributes the...
Read More
January 23, 2012, 02:01 PM ET

Were you to ask to ask me to
describe myself, which you would never do, of course, being too
well-bred, and were I to answer, which I would never do, I would
perhaps say (rather modestly) that I fancied myself as terribly,
terribly loyal. And you'll have noticed, from the rather odd
diction of that appallingly ridiculous first line, that I'm also
being terribly, terribly influenced at the moment by my recent
watching of television programs heavily laden with the British
sauce, don't you know. You see, darling, I wasn't sure quite sure
whether or not I was really permitted to like
Downton
Abbey because, after all, it seemed so thoroughly and entirely
based on
Upstairs Downstairs that one could hardly turn a
corner in the drawing room, open a door in the pantry, or
sneak into the mistress's dressing room in the Abbey without
entering Eaton Place first. You recall Eaton Place, don't ...
Read More
January 22, 2012, 08:47 PM ET
The NYT's Public Editor, Arthur Brisbane, remains clueless about
the political reality of our time. (But I must immediately
step up to confess factual error, committed in the interest of
pith, for his office is in fact a few blocks from Times Square.)
Earlier this month, he asked aloud "whether and when New York
Times news reporters should challenge 'facts' that are asserted by
newsmakers they write about." Said gaffe was worsened by
the unwittingly hilarious headline slapped on it ("Should The Times
Be a Truth Vigilante?") The letters that poured in were
almost uniformly scathing, making it plain that Times readers had
far outdistanced their anointed ombudsman in their understanding
that if journalists do not correct the false claims they report,
they are not journalists at all, but rather stenographers—or worse,
to quote the late, great Jack Newfield on the ideal Washington ...
Read More
January 22, 2012, 05:35 PM ET
Joe Paterno has died. His family confirmed his passing in a press
statement released Sunday morning. Paterno succumbed to lung
cancer, a condition for which he was being treated. He died at the
age of 85—a legend to many Penn State alumni. According to the
family statement:
“He fought hard until the end, stayed
positive, thought only of others and constantly reminded everyone
of how blessed his life had been. His ambitions were far-reaching,
but he never believed he had to leave this Happy Valley to achieve
them. He was a man devoted to his family, his university, his
players and his community.” To be sure, the legacy that
survives Joe Paterno’s death will never be viewed as tarnished by
those who loved and adored him the most. They will remember him for
his victories in sport, his fortitude and staying power as a coach.
Paterno won more games than any other major football...
Read More