February 3, 2012, 03:37 PM ET
Early this morning, I
posted my
thoughts on why the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation’s
decision to cut most of its funding to Planned Parenthood was a sad
thing for women. The cancer fund-raising charity has now
apologized and retracted its decision. Planned Parenthood is
again eligible for (although I must note, not in any way
guaranteed) grant money from Komen. Nancy Brinker, Komen’s chief
executive, posted the following
statement
on the cancer foundation’s
Web
site: “We want to apologize to the American public for recent
decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of
saving women’s lives.” The statement went on to say, “We will
continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned
Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future
grants.” It included these critically important words: “We will
amend the criteria [for grants]...
Read More
February 3, 2012, 09:01 AM ET
So let’s say you so loathe Planned Parenthood for the fact that 3
percent of its services go to abortions that you don’t give a fig
about the reasons why the Susan G.Komen for the Cure Foundation,
the leading breast cancer advocacy organization in America,
ended its long partnership with Planned Parenthood. You're just
plain happy. Or let’s say you buy into the fantasy that poor women
can easily find someplace other than Planned Parenthood to go and
get mammograms--which save lives by detecting breast cancer in its
earliest stages. Or let’s say you even buy the argument of Komen’s
founder and chief executive, Nancy G. Brinker, who held a news
conference yesterday (desperately trying to contain the damage
caused by the decision) insisting that Komen’s decision had
“nothing to do with abortion or politics.” Throwing around the
smack of “mission” statements and...
Read More
February 3, 2012, 02:18 AM ET
For quite a while, I’ve been concerned about how norms change in
countries where human rights abuses persist despite international
interventions, treaties, and the promulgation of laws.
Sometimes cultural traditions are so deeply entrenched that “law”
does not seem to matter. For example, last week, an Afghan woman
was found dead shortly after giving birth to her third
daughter. Police believe that her mother-in-law assisted in
the murder, by aiding her son as he strangled his wife to
death. For months, the victim lived in fear that she would
die if another girl were born into her family. It’s illegal
to murder, but the instincts surrounding family honor, tradition,
and birthing boys mattered more to the family that murdered the
young mother. According to local authorities and friends of the
22-year-old woman (only known as Estorai), she knew that her
husband would...
Read More
February 3, 2012, 01:10 AM ET
Remember that young phenom who
rocked the 2004
Democratic National Convention with the refrain “we worship an
awesome God in the blue states!”? Well, in style, at least, he was
nowhere to be found at yesterday’s National Prayer Breakfast.
Indeed, listening to President Obama deliver his remarks I was
struck by the dirge-like joylessness of his oration. In substance,
however, his speech quietly drove home many of the core-beliefs of
the ever-mobilizing, ever-regrouping, ever-coming-in-second-place
American Religious Left. Listening carefully to Obama’s sedate
address, one could detect a rather tenacious, albeit sometimes
disheveled, defense of the principles that Progressives of Faith
live by:
We are not separationist secularists: The
president has been distancing himself from separationist secularism
since as far back as
The Audacity of Hope. And he did so
again yesterday...
Read More
February 2, 2012, 06:45 PM ET
Kelly Egger's
WSJ piece titled
"Best Networking Tips" is precisely the kind of
article I can imagine being dismissed by most readers of
The
Chronicle. "It's not like this in the academy," they might
say, if they were the types who say "academy." Or they might say,
"This is exactly the kind of shallow, hyper-competitive
neo-conservative capitalistic garbage that made me leave my
well-paid position at UBS for film school at NYU," although they
might not say it quite that way to producers with whom they one day
hope to collaborate--not unless they were really, really cute. And
while it's true that graduate students looking for jobs might not
have to take workshops on handshaking ("Weak handshakes turn people
off, so practice yours with a friend to make sure it's neither
bone-crushing nor wimpy"), there were several points in Egger's
article our own job seekers might find useful. The...
Read More
February 1, 2012, 11:31 PM ET
We humanists these days are afflicted by so many calamities
(downsizing, disrespect, directionlessness) that it is easy to
lapse into a state of complete
demoralysis (=
demoralization + moral paralysis). Understandable as such a lapse
might be, it is
less depressingmore productive to
envision how we might assure the future of our guild. One possible
solution to the crisis--and this is a long-term solution, I
confess--centers around getting faculty to commit to
mentoring students. It's an unusually difficult concept to
grasp for my academic generation. As such, I provide you with some
helpful FAQ's.
As per my syllabus, I hold office hours 90
minutes a week (!), and I'm pretty much always in there. Is that
mentoring? No. Conducting OH is decidedly not mentoring.
Far from it (and would it kill you to put in an extra half hour a
week?). It's necessary, don't get me wrong. But that's not...
Read More
February 1, 2012, 02:50 PM ET
A while back, I had a student with a serious attitude problem.
Let’s call her “Sue.” On the first day of an art course in which I
first encountered Sue, my antennae shot up. At the end of my
opening presentation, when I asked for questions, Sue responded by
launching a missile. Due to her internship obligations, she would
be late for several classes. I reiterated my policy on lateness
(it’s strict) and suggested it might be best for her to drop my
course. To this Sue responded that she needed to take my course to
graduate (translation: “Your course is the course that suits my
schedule”). Once the course got underway, Sue proved to be an
exceptional student—in terms of mastery of the content—in fact, one
of the best in the class. Still, she made it a daily practice to
launch little missiles directly at me. She arrived late for each
class, always causing a ruckus. I...
Read More
February 1, 2012, 09:46 AM ET
If the past decade had an emblematic moment for clinical research,
it was probably November 12, 2005, the day when
Bloomberg
Markets published its cover story,
“Big Pharma's Shameful
Secret.” In that issue,
Bloomberg reporters laid out
the story of SFBC International, a contract research organization
in Miami that was paying undocumented immigrants to test the safety
of new drugs in a seedy motel. The SFBC owners had converted the
lobby into a large waiting area with plastic chairs, and they were
housing their research subjects six to a room. The medical director
of the research site was unlicensed to practice medicine; the
Institutional Review Board that approved many of the studies was
owned by the wife of the company vice-president; and the converted
motel, which had been cited for fire and safety violations, was
eventually
demolished.
Nonetheless, SFBC had become an...
Read More
February 1, 2012, 05:12 AM ET
Or "How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Murder." I am
now and have always been of the “peace camp,” employing an
activist’s zeal combined with an academic’s scholarship in support
of peace and in opposition to violence and war, especially the
nuclear variety. I’ve also rarely had much doubt about
policies I espouse personally and recommend publicly, which makes
me all the more uncomfortable as I monitor my own responses to a
lengthy and disturbing article in last Sunday’s New York Times
Magazine, titled
“Will Israel Attack Iran?” The piece was thoughtful,
well-balanced, and highly informed. It laid out the major issues,
reviewed much of the relevant history, discussed political as well
as policy considerations, and concluded that some sort of attack
was not unlikely, this year. (Gulp!) Perhaps the article was itself
part of a propaganda effort designed to increase pressure on the
...
Read More
January 31, 2012, 06:38 PM ET
Some miscellaneous news reports with implications for higher ed--
The
Wall Street Journal
reports today on a study by Stanford researchers showing a
strong correlation between media multitasking and social and
emotional development for pre-teen girls. The study by
Clifford Nass and Roy Pea found that the more the subjects (sample
size 3,461) watched videos, emailed, texted, etc., the more they
experienced "low social confidence, not feeling normal, having more
friends whom parents perceive as poor influences, and even sleeping
less." It's only a correlation, the authors warn, but they
proceed to identify a common and simple antidote: face time.
The direct encounter with faces, they say, teaches young girls to
develop social awareness, to learn body language, to read other
people's facial expressions. Face-to-face communication is
"just enormously important," Nass asserts. One...
Read More