April 19, 2012, 10:10 AM ET
A few times a year, evincing uncharacteristic civic-mindedness and
personal grace, I do some
pro bono lecturing in front of
local religious groups. Invariably, such groups are comprised
of really, really old people. How old?
Even older than my
moms!, as I like to tell my moms when I call her up every
night to report on my daily activities like the good Jewish boy she
raised me to be. Now, as is most likely the case with you dear
colleague, I spend the majority of my lecturing life in front of
really, really
young people. The types of people who say
"Whatevs," "obvs" "idk" and call each other (and sometimes,
regrettably, even me) "dude." They wear stained sweatpants to class
and drink water out of huge plastic bottles--appalling cultural
artifacts of high toxicity and dubious hygienic standing. As far as
those healthy little bastards are concerned,
I'm really,
really old people. But...
Read More
April 19, 2012, 09:23 AM ET
How can philosophy be done like a science? Again, obviously, I am
going to rely on my own experience and I want to tell you about a
project I had some 20 or more years ago. For us philosophers of
science, the big problem back then was the extent to which science
can be said to be a disinterested picture of objective reality and
to what extent it is a “social construction,” an epiphenomenon of
the culture or society (especially the values) of the day. Karl
Popper, in a felicitous phrase, referred to science as “knowledge
without a knower,” meaning not that scientists don’t do the knowing
but that science is value free. The anatomy or sexual orientation
or religion or race of a scientist or whatever his/her culture is
irrelevant to the science. The Nazis were not so much wrong as
conceptually confused when they talked of Jewish science. Following
Thomas Kuhn, and infused with...
Read More
April 18, 2012, 08:26 PM ET
I see we’re heading into another angst-fest over how fat Americans
have become. It was about a year ago that
I
blogged on the breaking news that America was first in the
world in terms of fatness.
Today I read that starting next month, HBO will be showing a
four-part documentary called
The Weight of the Nation. A
book with this title is forthcoming as well. We’re back with fat.
All the studies on American obesity give us the same droningly
depressing numbers: Two out of three adult Americans are overweight
or obese, as is one in three children and teens. Experts are
zeroing in on American food as the culprit. In particular, we’re
overweight because of American agriculture (we produce lots of corn
sugar and fatty meats) and the excess amount of food we eat.
Instead of nourishing us, then, our food is killing us. Forces
other than what’s in our food, and how much food we eat,...
Read More
April 18, 2012, 03:31 PM ET
A just-released report confirms earlier studies showing that
machines score many short essays about the same as human graders.
Once again, panic ensues: We can't let robots grade our students'
writing! That would be so, uh, mechanical. Admittedly, this panic
isn't about Scantron grading of multiple-choice tests, but an
ideological, market- and
foundation-driven effort to automate assessment
of that exquisite brew of rhetoric, logic, and creativity called
student writing. Without question, this study is performed by folks
with
huge financial stakes in the results, and they are driven by
non-education motives. But isn't the real question not
whether the machines deliver similar scores, but
why? It seems possible that what really troubles us about
the success of machine assessment of simple writing forms isn't the
scoring, but the writing itself--forms of writing that don't exist
anywhere ...
Read More
April 17, 2012, 01:28 PM ET
UConn President Susan Herbst's recent
article in the Huffington Post defending the role of
full-time scholars and teachers was encouraging to those of us who
work at the place where she's the new boss. Herbst seems like
she's doing a good job: The last time she met me she remembered my
name. Pretty much that's all it takes to be my best friend. Apart
from spending too much time--as does everyone else--talking about
sports being UConn's "front porch" (which seems to be losing
several of its central pillars to the NBA draft, not that I'm
bitter), to her credit Herbst has made a dedicated effort to meet
the faculty. She's been a presence on the campus and has pledged to
support the hiring of new tenure-track faculty. But I thought it
might be the right moment to give President Herbst an even more
focused version of how, exactly,
this UConn faculty member
spent her day yesterday: 9:30...
Read More
April 17, 2012, 09:05 AM ET

Why should students study
bioethics at a university plagued with bioethical scandals? That’s
the uncomfortable question here in Minnesota, where our bioethics
graduate program is housed in an academic health center seemingly
intent on making its way into the
Guinness Book of World
Records for Disgraceful Behavior.
Research death,
corruption,
scientific
fraud,
invasion
of privacy,
nepotism,
double-dipping,
employment
discrimination,
manipulation of research data,
improper
industry influence, a U.S. Senate investigation into
hidden
conflicts of interest: As soon as the shock of one revelation
begins to fade, the press uncovers another one. Which raises the
question: Wouldn’t being admitted to study bioethics at the
University of Minnesota be a little like winning a fellowship to
study ethics in the Nixon White House? The problem is not unique to
Minnesota. Like parasites in the...
Read More
April 17, 2012, 08:58 AM ET
A couple of people have asked me to follow up on my “Is Philosophy
a Science?” post, so here we go. In this one, I will try to show
how I think science can inform and help solve philosophical
problems. In the next, I will show how I think a scientific (or
naturalistic) approach to philosophy can pay dividends. And then
perhaps to finish, I will tackle the perennial question of whether
philosophy, unlike science, never gets any sure answers or makes
any progress. For today, take ethics – moral philosophy. There are
two big questions: What should I do? (This is known as substantive
or normative ethics.) Why should I do what I should do?
(Meta-ethics, to do with foundations.) As far as substantive ethics
is concerned, from David Hume via Charles Darwin, I argue that
ultimately what we should do is what we feel we should do – there
is no higher court of appeal – and what we feel ...
Read More
April 16, 2012, 09:55 PM ET
That deafening, churning, leather-on-wood sound you just heard is
the sound of the entire Romney campaign "pivoting to the general,"
as the pundits like to say. In the coming months, Mitt and his
Faith and Values team will need to figure out how to draw lucrative
religious voting blocs to the Republican side of the ledger.
Faith-based politicking is always a complicated affair, and for
these reasons I offer a few hopefully helpful suggestions on how
the Romney team ought to proceed:
Bait the secularists (if
you must): Secular-bashing is among the easiest, and most
intellectually dishonest, forms of Faith and Values politicking out
there. Easy, because there is widespread confusion as to what
"secularism" means. The dreaded "ism" can conveniently stand in for
anything a politician loathes: godlessness, gang violence,
pornography--it's all good. Or, bad as the case may be. It is...
Read More
April 16, 2012, 09:17 PM ET
I see the New York Times has a
report out on the first Sex Week at Harvard. Apparently a
decade behind Yale on this one, Harvard students decided it was
time to explore their friskier sides. (At least they wanted to do
so more formally. When I was a student, my house just had an annual
party at which pieces of chocolate shaped like genitals were handed
out. You weren't required to sit through any panels or lectures, as
I recall.) Of course, events like Sex Week are always couched in
the language of providing students with "more information." The
piece begins with an exchange in which a senior finds out for the
first time that Implanon, an implantable form of birth control, is
available to her for free! How had she gone through four years
without such a vital piece of information, the reader is left to
wonder? Well, you know, it's because she's a Harvard student. As
one of the organizers...
Read More
April 16, 2012, 12:00 PM ET
After the least wintry winter in memory, Tennessee seems to
have been brain-fried into cloud-cuckoo land. On March 19,
the legislature in its wisdom
mandated climate-change denial in the state's K-12 science
education curriculum. The Assembly voted 70-23 and the
Senate, 24-8. The Tennessee law matches a model called,
of course, the
Environmental Literacy Improvement
Act, promoted by ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange
Council to
• Provide a range of perspectives presented in a
balanced manner. • Provide instruction in critical thinking so
that students will be able to fairly and objectively evaluate
scientific and economic controversies. • Be presented in
language appropriate for education rather than
for propagandizing. • Encourage students to explore different
perspectives and form their own opinions. • Encourage an
atmosphere of respect for different...
Read More