• September 3, 2015

With Lawsuit, For-Profit Colleges Step Up Fight Against New Regulations

The association representing for-profit colleges is ratcheting up its campaign against the Obama administration's new regulations on student recruiting and other actions by the colleges, adding a legal push to its already vigorous lobbying and public-relations campaigns.

On Friday the Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities sued the U.S, Department of Education, arguing that three new rules—one designed to prevent misrepresentation in recruiting, another to end the tying of compensation to enrollment, and a third to give states greater oversight over distance education—exceed the department's authority, were developed with inadequate due process, and, in at least one case, are unconstitutional.

The association said it had coupled its lawsuit with a letter to Education Secretary Arne Duncan, giving the department one week to voluntarily withdraw the contested regulations, which are scheduled to go into effect on July 1. If the department does not do so, the association said, it would file a second lawsuit seeking an injunction that could immediately block the rules while any legal issues are litigated.

Harris N. Miller, president of the association, acknowledged that suing the department was unusual but said his group's 1,500 member colleges felt it was the only choice because good-faith efforts at negotiations with the department had failed. The colleges believe the regulations leave too many ambiguities and they "can't just wait until July 1 and wait to be sued" by students or whistle-blowers alleging violations of the rules, he said in an interview on Friday.

The Education Department's single-sentence response signaled little sign of retreat. "We're confident that the published regulations will do the best job of protecting students and taxpayers," said Justin Hamilton, the department's chief spokesman.

Whether the case has merits or is simply part of a lot of "political theater" surrounding the regulations, as Terry W. Hartle of the American Council on Education put it on Friday, remains to be seen.

The for-profit colleges' complaint says the department "strayed beyond its statutory mandate and employed unlawful proceedings" in developing the rules.

The suit applies to a series of rules the department made final in October. It does not address the pending but already controversial "gainful employment" regulations, which would cut off federal student aid to programs whose students have high debt-to-income ratios and low loan-repayment rates, although that rule too is expected to prompt its own lawsuit, once it is finalized.

"If they're going to come out guns blaring on this, watch out for gainful employment," said Kevin Kinser, a senior researcher at the Institute for Global Education Policy Studies at the State University of New York at Albany who studies the for-profit education industry.

In the complaint filed in federal court in the District of Columbia Friday, the association asserts that the new rule prohibiting misrepresentation in student recruiting is too vague and could leave colleges liable for inadvertent misstatements. "Even before they officially become effective, the misrepresentation regulations are chilling schools' constitutionally protected speech," the complaint says.

The complaint argues that the new rule on states' authority to regulate all colleges operating in their jurisdictions impinges on states' prerogatives to define what rules they impose on colleges.

And it contends that eliminating the 12 "safe harbors" under which colleges could use enrollment and graduation goals as part of their criteria for compensating employees leaves institutions with too little guidance on what is lawful. (The "safe harbors" describe compensation approaches that are legal.)

Many traditional colleges also have concerns about the "lack of guidance" in the regulations covering compensation for college officials, said Mr. Hartle, senior vice president for government and public affairs at the council, an umbrella group for higher-education associations. As now written, some fear, the rule could be construed to prohibit compensation plans that reward presidents and others for enrollment growth or improvements in graduation rates. "We're hearing from provosts" and others, Mr. Hartle said Friday. But he said he's hopeful that a clarification that the department has promised to issue in early 2011 will resolve many of the concerns.

Lawsuits of this sort are not only unusual, they are also rarely successful. Typically, "courts give administrative agencies wide latitude in interpreting the law," Mr. Hartle noted. That was one of the reasons the council chose not to join the suit. Also, he noted, for the council, lawsuits are "an absolute last resort."

In announcing the lawsuit, the private-colleges association sought to capitalize on President Obama's recent business-friendly overtures, which included an executive order urging agencies to curtail overly burdensome regulations. The contested regulations are "a classic case of bureaucratic overreach" said Mr. Miller.

He said his group is also continuing to lobby on Capitol Hill against those rules and the gainful-employment regulation. "You can use as many branches of government as you want" to press a cause, he said. In Congress, "we haven't even had a chance to educate the new members."


1. henr1055 - January 24, 2011 at 10:39 am

I had a student who took 30 hours from University of Phoenix. She had a letter from UOP that said she could take any degree to be an elementary school teacher in Texas as long as she took the licensing examination and passed it. It was just a lie. There are special courses for Elementary School Certifications including an internship (student teaching) and two licensing exams. Buyer beware.


2. bowl_haircut - January 24, 2011 at 01:35 pm

This really goes beyond "buyer beware" and the Department of Education knows it, hence the regulatory crackdown on for-profits. Best case scenario here, in my view, would be that the regulatory climate becomes so draconian and pressurized that this whole for-profit "experiment" just goes away. Maybe future generations will see this for what it really is--an unfortunate chapter in the history of higher education.

3. kaelinmuse - January 24, 2011 at 02:38 pm

I went to a top tier, private, liberal arts university and graduated with honors. My gainful employment was as a bartender for several years. There are benefits to traditional learning when a person has the resources to take advantage but many for-profits serve those who may not have had access to a traditional learning environment. Perhaps attention should be paid to processes and outcomes as opposed to the use of blanket lables.

4. melibrary - January 27, 2011 at 06:54 am

It is important for outsiders looking in to the for-profit sector that an appreciation is gained for the distinct differences in many institutions. Not all for-profit colleges are publicly traded, and are not operating in the online environment. The outrage for many institutions is the inappropriate grouping of family owned, non-traded schools who have historically served their communities for decades, with large conglomerates who seek profit as the end goal. If the imposed rules are to be fair, there must be a re-grouping of for-profit colleges to account for this distinction.

5. balthazar - January 30, 2011 at 01:08 pm

This discussion should not even be had. We are talking about education here. It is ethically wrong to cash in on and seek profit from it--period. This world is absolutely PATHETIC. The electronic delivery system of education is very much equivalent to that of traditional brick and mortar institutions. This way of educating is much, much more economical, to where students even pay crazy extra technology fees to take care of the institutions server and developer costs. The DOE should get with state universities and create the true on-line education where entrance exams and adequate testing is used to completely validate the outcome for those that pass the trials and tests of higher education. Our government should realize the economic possibilities and pass those on to citizens who currently pay high costs just to work hard while some schmuck is counting all the proceeds that us suckers are just throwing at him.

Add Your Comment

Commenting is closed.

  • 1255 Twenty-Third St., N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037
subscribe today

Get the insight you need for success in academe.