• Sunday, May 27, 2012
  • Print
  • Comment (9)

Wayne State's Black-White Graduation Gap Reflects Detroit's Struggles

Wayne State U.'s Stark Graduation Gaps Reflect Detroit's Struggles 1

Fabrizio Costantini for The Chronicle

Students at Wayne State participate in a "learning community" class on Motown, part of the university's effort to raise its retention and graduation rates, which are particularly low for black students.

Enlarge Image
close Wayne State U.'s Stark Graduation Gaps Reflect Detroit's Struggles 1

Fabrizio Costantini for The Chronicle

Students at Wayne State participate in a "learning community" class on Motown, part of the university's effort to raise its retention and graduation rates, which are particularly low for black students.

Wayne State University, like many people who call Detroit home, is finding that succeeding in the Motor City is not as easy as it once was. Drawing a majority of its students from the metropolitan area's schools, the public research university now confronts many of the problems created by the struggling city's decline.

Located in the heart of one of the nation's most racially segregated areas, Wayne State itself has the biggest white-black gap in graduation rates among public universities with significant numbers of students of both races. From 2006 to 2008, fewer than one in 10 of Wayne State's black students graduated within six years, compared with more than four in 10 of its white students, according to the Education Trust, a Washington-based advocacy and research group.

Wayne State's numbers stood out not only because of the wide gap, but also because of the large number of black students it enrolls. Close to one-third of the university's 20,000 undergraduates are black. No other college on the Education Trust's list of the 25 public institutions with the worst graduation gaps, published this year, had a student body in which more than 14 percent were black, nor did any other institution have a single-digit graduation rate for its black students.

While public universities nationwide have an average black-white graduation gap of about 16 percentage points, the Education Trust's report on the issue said such gaps are not inevitable. It pointed to institutions such as Georgia State University, where about one-third of students are black, and the graduation rates of black students are slightly better than those of their white peers.

Chronicle of Higher Education

Outside observers say the problem at Wayne State is dire. If so few students are completing degrees, some experts say, the university is wasting financial aid, student tuition, and taxpayer money, and failing to help students who need it most.

"If these students aren't graduating, then they're going to be stuck at the same economic level as their parents," said Sharif Shakrani, a professor at the Education Policy Center at Michigan State University. "Education is an important instrument to break that cycle."

A City of Challenges

Wayne State officials say breaking the cycle is their goal. They began to focus on the roots of the university's low graduation rates five years ago, convening groups to suggest interventions and redirecting resources to programs designed to improve academic success. But improvements take time to show up, especially when measuring progress in six-year graduation rates.

And Wayne State officials, faculty members, and community groups say the conversation about the university's poor record on graduation has been too focused on race. Because of its location, part of the university's historic mission has been to provide higher-education access to the city's urban core, a group of residents who face numerous impediments to completing a four-year degree.

"It's being framed as a race issue, but race is never a determining factor," said Howard N. Shapiro, Wayne State's associate vice president for undergraduate programs and general education. "You have to look to the things that correlate with race, things such as socioeconomic status and financial aid, things that are strong determinants of college success."

The barriers to retaining and graduating students are in many respects the problems of Detroit in general. The city has one of the lowest-performing public-school systems in the country, setting a national record for low scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a test taken by fourth, eighth, and 12th graders, with about 77 percent of students scoring below basic math levels in 2009.

Detroit is in a period of economic decline, with an unemployment rate of about 14 percent, and the metropolitan area has sharp racial divisions. In the 2000 census, 70 percent of black residents who lived in the metropolitan area lived within the city limits, where per capita income averaged less than $16,000 per year, compared with $100,000 in some parts of the metropolitan area that are predominantly white.

Two years ago, having recognized that it needed to do more to help students succeed, the university issued a report that included 16 recommendations for improving retention, including hiring faculty members with expertise in remedial education, tracking the progress of individual students, and identifying the common factors in the experiences of those who drop out.

Poor Preparation

The university found that students from Detroit, about 23 percent of undergraduates, were less likely than their peers to return to Wayne State for a second year. About 70 percent of first-year, full-time students from Detroit return, a rate about 10 percentage points lower than that of other students. Administrators attribute part of that difference to the poor preparation Detroit public-school students tend to receive for college-level work.

Students must have a 2.75 grade-point average, or at least a 2.0 average combined with an ACT composite score of at least 21 or an SAT total of at least 990, to be admitted to Wayne State. But the university has several programs that allow students to gain admission with significantly lower scores and grades. About 30 percent of last year's freshman class had ACT scores of less than 18.

Wayne State administrators and faculty members say that if they want the students they admit to succeed, they have to design curricula and provide support services that correct deficiencies in students' high-school instruction.

About half of Wayne State students who take the basic and intermediate algebra courses fail. To raise those low rates—a common impediment to graduation—the department is changing the model of instruction from a computer-lab course to a small-class format that also requires small-group meetings outside class. Daniel Frohardt, chairman of the mathematics department, said students in those classes tended to perform better on tests than do students in the computer-based sections.

Ellen L. Barton, chairwoman of the English department, worked to overhaul the basic English curriculum to respond to poor college preparation. She said many students' high-school writing focused on personal narratives. Required English courses now focus on teaching students different genres of college-level writing, such as expository and persuasive.

Other changes the university has made include improving academic advising by adding more staff members and requiring meetings for students whom faculty members identify as being in need of help. Administrators are also developing partnerships with a number of community colleges in the Detroit area to provide instruction to some students who are not ready for university-level work. Those students would then move to Wayne State to complete bachelor's degrees.

Making Education Matter

If it is to improve its graduation rates, Wayne State must also take on social factors that play into students' decisions to leave college, which are often difficult to define and change.

Part of the issue is financial need. Wayne State enrolls a higher percentage of students who qualify for Pell Grants than any other Michigan college. Studies show that people with high financial need are more likely than their peers to leave college to pursue jobs or to withdraw because of concerns about debt.

The report on retention that Wayne State released two years ago noted that student decisions such as taking a full-time job while also taking a full course load or taking semesters off "undermine academic success and put students at risk of dropping out."

"They leave because they say they want to go work at McDonald's to make enough to come back, but the reason you're in college in the first place is because you can never make enough at McDonald's," Mr. Shapiro said. "So the situation never changes, and those students never come back."

Faculty members say many students come from single-parent or low-income households. Because Wayne State is mostly a commuter university, it serves a large number of working students and older adults, who often enroll part time. Those students tend to be vulnerable to life changes that make it hard to continue studies. When their family members lose jobs, those students are sometimes forced to drop courses or withdraw.

"We're looking at these issues, but we really have no control over them," said Seymour J. Wolfson, a computer-science professor and president of the university's Academic Senate.

While more financial aid might help in some situations, faculty members say there is a lack of emphasis on education in many Detroit neighborhoods, a remnant of a time when blue-collar jobs dominated the economy and residents could get well-paying jobs in manufacturing plants with only a high-school diploma.

To combat that attitude, administrators are trying to foster a greater focus on academics, including by getting more students to live on campus. In the past 10 years, the university has built three residence halls, to house about 1,600 students.

That priority, though, has been criticized by some faculty and staff members. who say money spent on facilities would be better used to develop academic-support systems. "Dorms are great for maybe 800 people, but that still leaves 22,000 at home," said Frank F. Koscielski, an academic-services officer at Wayne State. "They're sacrificing students and programs for buildings."

Another change Wayne State is pursuing to foster academic connections is the development of "learning communities," small groups of students who meet regularly and take several courses together. First-year students in learning communities in the fall of 2008 returned at a rate of about 82.6 percent, six percentage points above the university average.

Mr. Shapiro said the communities were based a similar project at Georgia State University, in Atlanta. About 15 years ago Georgia State was in a situation similar to Wayne State in respect to graduation rates, but it has turned around its poor performance. Georgia State's six-year graduation rate for minority students increased from 32.3 percent to 50.7 percent between 2002 and 2007, according to the Education Trust.

Georgia State had taken a number of steps to improve retention, creating learning communities, peer-tutoring programs, and an early-warning system for students who were struggling a few weeks into the academic year. Tim M. Renick, associate provost for academic programs, said that none of the retention efforts were geared specifically for minority students, many of whom are the first in their families to attend college, but that those students tend to sign up in larger numbers than white students and benefit the most from working with peers.

"Traditional college kids might be more comfortable going to knock on a professor's door when they need help," Mr. Renick said. "First-generation kids might have a little less confidence getting the help they need from a professor."

Retention Returns

Other urban colleges, including California State University at Sacramento and the University of Cincinnati, have also seen significant gains in minority graduation and retention rates. Most of their interventions and efforts to improve have been similar to what Georgia State has adopted and what Wayne State is trying. They include personalized advising, programs to teach study skills, and small-group help sessions, especially for basic and remedial courses.

At Wayne State, administrators say they have begun to see some improvements as new programs take effect. Retention rates after students' first and second semesters have risen over the past three years, and administrators expect that to be reflected in higher graduation rates down the road.

The more students return, the more money Wayne State retains in tuition. That, in turn, allows the university to spend more on retention.

Administrators hope that efforts to improve graduation rates ultimately will also help drive recovery in Detroit. The new dorms, they say, have already prompted the opening of coffee shops, restaurants, and stores nearby in midtown Detroit. Having a larger population of students staying on campus for longer periods of time could lure even more businesses, officials say.

"The university is kind of a bright spot here in Detroit," Mr. Shapiro said. "It's probably one of the only things here growing and driving change."

Comments

1. 11169801 - October 20, 2010 at 07:56 am

Trinity in Washington, a comprehensive private university in D.C., confronted similar issues as our population of D.C. Public School graduates increased to nearly half of our student body in our historic undergraduate women's college --- we educate more DC residents than any private university in the nation, and the preparatory deficiencies of the DCPS students are well known. We have accepted the challenge to educate these women as a matter of mission, inspired by our founders, the Sisters of Notre Dame, whose charism calls us to action for social justice, especially for women who have been on the economic margins of society.

While much smaller than Wayne State, and with no public funding, we had to tackle the challenges directly and aggressively. Our faculty created a new general education curriculum emphasizing first year success through a heavy focus on building collegiate foundation skills in critical reading, mathematical competency and writing. We also created learning communities for all first year students, and the senior faculty who lead those communities are also the academic advisors for each cluster of 18 students. With a heavy focus on retention management and student success across both academic and administrative departments --- financial aid and enrollment services play huge roles in helping students figure out how to develop sustainable financial habits, while health services works closely with academic advisors to get students in crisis the right kind of medical or mental health assistance, and residence life works closely with deans to check in with students who are missing class --- we have seen our retention rates climb considerably over the last four years, and that improvement will change the ultimate completion rates for those cohorts dramatically.

All of this comes at great cost, however: participating in a Lumina workshop on the cost of remediation for at-risk first year students a few years ago, our academic team estimated that the implementation cost for this new first year experience program exceeded $1 million, which is a considerable sum for a relatively small private institution with limited outside funding.

While much national and local attention has focused on providing access to college through more financial aid support (e.g., increased Pell grants, more local scholarships from private funders), we need significantly more attention paid to the real costs of providing the "wrap-around" support services necessary to improve completion rates for at-risk students. Many institutions are trying to address these issues, and yet, we are also under considerable pressure to restrain tuition growth. The challenge of paying for the additional services necessary to ensure student success while controlling tuition prices needs to be a more prominent part of this discussion.

2. gharbisonne - October 20, 2010 at 08:31 am

Black students are just the canary in the coal mine here; the white student graduation rate is also abysmal. But what do you expect when you admit a freshman class 30% of which is below 18 on the ACT? That's the 32nd percentile, below what the ACT says is baseline proficiency for college level work in all subjects.

3. davidperuski - October 20, 2010 at 08:36 am

I agree with all of the interventions to improve retention and graduation rates. However, until we address the real issue, which is years of learning in a public school system that does not work, we are never really going to make enormous strides in this area. If we want to spend our tax dollars well we need to get at the heart of K-12 public education and demand quality in education that produces results. I will also note that it is not just the system though. We have social ills that do not promote student learning and respect for the teacher and authority figures. As a society, we are ill, and we have lost, to some degree, why there should be respect for the teacher and for authority figures. Until we correct some of these ills we will see persistent issues and no matter what we do minimal gains will be made. You don't instill values and beliefs, work habits and other important character traits at the age of 18. At that age they have already integrated and formulated most of their habits and so it is extremely difficult to change a person then. Why not mold our children at an early age and teach them respect and discipline from the beginning? I know this is a provacative view but I think it is also something that must be considered when trying to achieve success.

4. vlmarr - October 20, 2010 at 09:29 am

It seems that Kiley is spinning the same ol' yarn regarding "at-risk" students struggling in a city on the decline. While Wayne State is indeed located in Detroit, it is not a university exclusively for Detroiters dealing with issues currently (and historically) plaguing Detroit. As I have witnessed while teaching and earning a PhD there, the graduation gap problem does not rest solely on "disrespectful" or "underprepared" (read: Black) students from Detroit Public Schools--they merely serve as scapegoats to the failing business of academe. Admit thousands of undergraduates with tuition checks in hand, shoehorn them into impersonal computer labs to "learn" basic math, fail them when they don't "get it," force them to re-enroll until they do "get it," and keep the checks rolling in. (This also holds true for students attempting to transfer comparable credits from another institution.) When students realize they can no longer continue the cycle and decide to drop out, there is already a new crop of undergrads lining up for registration with checks in hand. While I commend the math and English departments for taking a proactive approach to meeting the needs of students, the university as a whole must work towards such changes and return to its original urban mission--too much emphasis is placed on research (given its R1 designation) and not enough on teaching and support.

5. 11132507 - October 20, 2010 at 10:39 am

It always distresses me when this whole problem of student success is measured purely by means of graduation rates and put into the context of "what are taxpayers getting for their money?" Don't get me wrong, these are not trivial. But study after study shows that those who at least attend some college are better off and earn more than those who don't. And it's the Waynes of the world that give that chance even if the student didn't graduate in the top 10% of their HS class or get high ACT/SAT scores or doesn't have $50K to pay for a year of college. My sister is a professor at Wayne and I'm very proud of her efforts to give a chance to those who realize the value of that chance. And what about those who stop attending but then return later (same school or elsewhere) and earn a degree? We all know that we've got no way of compiling reliable data on that, yet we act as though it doesn't exist. No degree within an arbitrary 6 year time frame = failure on everyone's part.

What about the students who at least come out with improved skills that help them get a better job at which they'll earn more money? Is that not a benefit to taxpayers?

6. blesstayo - October 20, 2010 at 01:10 pm

11132507, would you have been happy to enter college without graduating?
davidperuski, there is a "respect and responsibility" seminar all freshmen and transfer students pay for and take at my school. It helps somewhat but we have some conflicting student complaint policies that make professors who are serious about academic rigor and learning easy targets of whinning students in Math and Statistics courses.

7. 11132507 - October 20, 2010 at 02:12 pm

blesstayo - I'm glad I graduated, but I was fortunate in that my parents made my education a priority and could afford to pay for it (although that was a few decades ago, my first tuition bill was $22/credit). Not everyone has that advantage, and they might have to go about reaching their goals differently. College isn't one size fits all.

8. softshellcrab - October 20, 2010 at 02:26 pm

It was encouraging to see all the thoughful remarks here. I agree with gharbissone, #2, who writes: "what do you expect when you admit a freshman class 30% of which is below 18 on the ACT? That's the 32nd percentile, below what the ACT says is baseline proficiency for college level work in all subjects." Very true. Too many people are going to college. And it's not like the college has very tough standards, and still they can't cut it. If there were reasonably rigorous standards, as they should be, the rate would be about a third of the dismall rate it's at now.

9. 12094478 - October 22, 2010 at 12:51 pm

Why not create a two-year college between high school and the university? Students with lower scores or those who are unsure of their preparation for the university could attend, take the "in-between classes" that high schools seem to be unable to prepare their lower-performing students for, and then find out about their chances at succeeding at the university. Canada has a version of this. Our community colleges seem to be a perfect fit for this. Then you're not paying research professors to conduct a peer group meeting and telling them how to check out a book at the library with students who may not need to be in the university anyway. It is obvious that the model for the university does not meet the needs of all students who wish to attend.

With our university system marketing itself to everything under the sun and being unwilling to accept the fact that a lot of students are just not cut out for the university, then we need to adjust the model. Why not have the students run the gauntlet of the first years after high school without making the stakes so high for everyone involved?

Add Your Comment

Commenting is closed.