• July 22, 2014

Virginia's Governor, in Response to an Outcry, Says Workplace Bias Is Banned

Days after Virginia's attorney general ignited a controversy by telling public colleges and universities they had no authority to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation, the state's governor issued an executive directive on Wednesday advising all state employees that employment discrimination is prohibited under state and federal law.

In a letter last week, the attorney general, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, a Republican, advised the state's public universities and colleges that institutional policies banning discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation were invalid. Only the General Assembly had the authority to extend legal protection to gay state employees, Mr. Cuccinelli said.

That advice drew immediate criticism on campuses and in the news media.

Gov. Robert F. McDonnell, also a Republican, responded on Wednesday with his executive directive reminding state employees that workplace discrimination is illegal.

The directive, which is not as powerful as an executive order, does not in itself ban bias on the basis of sexual orientation. It does, however, cite the Virginia Human Rights Act and the equal-protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as protections against workplace discrimination.

In the directive, Governor McDonnell wrote: "I hereby direct that the hiring, promotion, compensation, treatment, discipline, and termination of state employees shall be based on an individual's job qualifications, merit, and performance."

For the Virginia Senate Democratic Caucus, the directive is not enough. "The caucus appreciates Governor McDonnell's directive, but they still feel these protections should be in the state code," said Michael K. Kelly, the caucus's director of communications.

Measures that would add protections for gay and lesbian employees have previously failed in the legislature.

Mr. McDonnell's choice of forbidding bias through an executive directive instead of an executive order, as Virginia's previous two governors had done, may have been for political reasons, said Carl Tobias, a professor of law at the University of Richmond.

Mr. McDonnell was the state's attorney general from 2006 through February 2009, when he resigned to campaign full time for governor. While serving as attorney general, Mr. McDonnell had said that the governor should not have the authority to make an executive order about workplace discrimination at public institutions.

"It would be difficult for him to turn around and issue an order in the face of that," Mr. Tobias said.

He added: "To some extent, I think the governor was trying to put out the fire" over Mr. Cuccinelli's letter.

The outcry, Mr. Tobias said, went beyond the impact on individuals of discrimination in the workplace. People were also concerned about institutions' autonomy and their ability to recruit top employees and students, he said.

Comments

1. gberkleycoats - March 11, 2010 at 09:33 am

It would appear that our Governor was taken-aback by the intense criticism of his removal of sexual orientation as a protected class. Our AG simply followed McDonnell's lead, and now he is taking the heat. This is what happens when you have Neanderthals is both positions - let this be a lesson to the rest of the country!

2. 1021ajr - March 11, 2010 at 02:11 pm

It seems to me that all the Governor has done is make more blatant the inequality. The directive isn't legally binding, whereas an executive order (or law) would be. Instead, he and his administration have created a situation of separate and unequal. It's just the start of their four year term in office - stay tuned for more.

3. jeff1 - March 12, 2010 at 08:00 am

Virginia has been on a slippery slope to facism for the past decade. Apparently the governor of the state is a right wing, backward rebel. Big surprise.

4. pachy - March 12, 2010 at 09:14 am

it wasn't until 1967 that Virginia allowed marriage between people of different colors.

As stated in Virginia law - ". It shall hereafter be unlawful for any white person in this State to marry any save a white person"

Welcome to the 19th century Virginia.

Add Your Comment

Commenting is closed.

subscribe today

Get the insight you need for success in academe.