The 'Personal Element' in Cheating

To the Editor:

After a decade of reviewing academic-misconduct cases, I found myself a little saddened by James M. Lang's suggestion that faculty members should never take cheating personally because students don't mean it that way ("It's Not You," Careers, October 26). Doubtless the same could be said about a lot of humans' bad behavior, much of which occurs without a personal grudge against the victims.

However, I cannot help but feel there is an irreducibly personal element

Digital or Print Subscription

Web Pass

Already have an account? Log In Now.

Administration

(Not) Burning Down the House
The Chronicle Review

Snips, Snails, Puppydog Tails, Etc.
Short Subjects

My Mom's the President? Get Me Out

Featured Commentary

The Berkeley Protest: Fresh Anger in the Footsteps

The students protesting the big tuition increase at the University of California impress Murray Sperber, who was in their shoes 45 years ago.
Teaching Matters: Creating Lives in the Classroom

Online avatars bring German history to life for students at Stanford. Edith Sheffer explains.
A Fine Legal Mess: When Student Groups Collide With Anti-Bias Policy

Can a college compel a student group to abide by antidiscrimination rules that violate its religious views? The U.S. Supreme Court isn't saying, writes Robert M. O'Neil.

Campus Viewpoint

Information provided by participating institution

The Chronicle of Higher Education
1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037

Letters to the Editor

The 'Personal Element' in Cheating

This is an article for subscribers only. You may access this article by purchasing a:

Digital or Print Subscription

Web Pass

Administration

The Chronicle Review

Short Subjects

Most Popular

Featured Commentary

The Berkeley Protest: Fresh Anger in the Footsteps

Teaching Matters: Creating Lives in the Classroom

A Fine Legal Mess: When Student Groups Collide With Anti-Bias Policy

Campus Viewpoint