Many scientists say that changes proposed by the National Institutes of Health to clarify the criteria for reviewing grant applications would do little to improve peer review, the process by which the agency whittles down the 30,000 grant…
This content is available exclusively to Chronicle subscribers
Already a subscriber?
Log in now
Not a subscriber yet?
Subscribe now for instant access to this article and thousands of others, data tables, and interactive charts — all available exclusively for Chronicle subscribers. Plus your subscription includes weekly print or digital delivery of The Chronicle and The Review and the Chronicle iPad® Edition.Subscribe Today