Judging the quality of a research paper by the rating of the journal that published it is a very poor measure of scientific merit. And yet, a study of more than 6,500 published papers has concluded, the leading alternatives are even worse.
This content is available exclusively to Chronicle subscribers
Already a subscriber?
Log in now
Not a subscriber yet?
Subscribe now for instant access to this article and thousands of others, data tables, and interactive charts — all available exclusively for Chronicle subscribers. Plus your subscription includes weekly print or digital delivery of The Chronicle and The Review and the Chronicle iPad® Edition.Subscribe Today