• Saturday, May 26, 2012
  • Print
  • Comment

Doctoral Programs by the Numbers

Select a Field:

Aerospace Engineering | Agricultural and Resource Economics | American Studies | Animal Sciences | Anthropology | Applied Mathematics | Astrophysics and Astronomy | Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology | Biology/Integrated Biology/Integrated Biomedical Sciences | Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering | Celland Developmental Biology | Chemical Engineering | Chemistry | Civil and Environmental Engineering | Classics | Communication | Comparative Literature | Computer Engineering | Computer Sciences | Earth Sciences | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | Economics | Electrical and Computer Engineering | Engineering Science and Materials | English Language and Literature | Entomology | FoodScience | Forestry and Forest Sciences | French and Francophone Language and Literature | Genetics and Genomics | Geography | German Language and Literature | History | History of Art, Architecture and Archaeology | Immunology and Infectious Disease | Kinesiology | Languages, Societies and Cultures | Linguistics | Materials Science and Engineering | Mathematics | Mechanical Engineering | Microbiology | Music | Neuroscience and Neurobiology | Nursing | Nutrition | Oceanography, Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology | Operations Research, Systems Engineering and Industrial Engineering | Pharmacology, Toxicology and Environmental Health | Philosophy | Physics | Physiology | Plant Sciences | Political Science | Psychology | Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration | Public Health | Religion | Sociology | Spanish and Portuguese Language and Literature | Statistics and Probability | Theatre and Performance Studies

Food Science

The National Research Council assessed programs according to 21 different criteria. Here are the NRC's five major ratings summarizing those criteria. For a detailed explanation, see our FAQ.

S-Rank: Programs are ranked highly if they are strong in the criteria that scholars say are most important.
Research: Derived from faculty publications, citation rates, grants, and awards.
Students: Derived from students' completion rates, financial aid, and other criteria.
Diversity: Reflects gender balance, ethnic diversity, and the proportion of international students.
R-Rank: Programs are ranked highly if they have similar features to programs viewed by faculty as top-notch.
Institution, program S-Rank High S-Rank Low Research High Research Low Students High Students Low Diversity High Diversity Low R-Rank High R-Rank Low
Clemson U.
Food Technology
25 29 27 31 14 22 14 27 11 29
Colorado State U.
Food Science & Human Nutrition
28 31 23 30 12 24 22 31 22 30
Cornell U.
Food Science & Technology
2 13 2 10 25 29 15 26 1 11
Iowa State U.
Food Science & Technology
6 22 3 18 7 22 2 4 11 23
Kansas State U.
Food Science
3 18 7 24 6 18 4 12 5 19
Louisiana State U. at Baton Rouge
Food Science
8 23 11 27 21 26 1 1 17 28
Michigan State U.
Food Science
19 28 10 24 28 31 6 15 16 30
Mississippi State U.
Food Science (Ph.D. in Food Sci., Nutrition)
15 27 24 31 4 14 15 28 19 29
North Carolina State U.
Food Science
12 25 9 24 4 20 5 14 6 21
Ohio State U. Main Campus
Food Science and Nutrition
2 14 4 20 7 19 4 12 2 17
Oklahoma State U. Main Campus
Food Science
26 30 13 27 24 31 3 8 25 31
Oregon State U.
Food Science and Technology
18 27 11 25 17 24 18 29 17 29
Pennsyl-
vania State U.

Food Science
3 17 4 22 1 9 12 22 8 21
Purdue U. Main Campus
Food Science
2 15 3 17 7 19 11 22 2 11
Rutgers U. at New Brunswick
Food Science
9 24 2 18 30 31 10 20 2 17
Texas A&M U.
Food Science & Technology
14 26 15 27 10 21 12 23 19 29
U. of Arkansas Main Campus
Food Science
2 10 3 21 1 5 6 15 2 16
U. of California at Davis
Food Science
4 17 3 17 5 17 11 26 4 21
U. of Florida
Food Sci. & Human Nutrition: Food Sci.
9 24 2 19 23 28 6 14 8 24
U. of Georgia
Food Science
2 11 2 13 12 21 3 10 2 17
U. of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign

Food Science and Human Nutrition
7 22 4 20 18 26 10 24 2 20
U. of Maryland at College Park
Food Science
6 21 7 23 1 16 17 28 10 23
U. of Massachu-
setts at Amherst

Food Science
1 1 1 1 1 8 26 31 1 9
U. of Minnesota-
Twin Cities

Food Science
15 25 13 26 4 18 24 30 3 17
U. of Missouri at Columbia
Food Science
30 31 30 31 25 29 4 13 24 31
U. of Nebraska at Lincoln
Food Science & Technology
8 22 17 29 3 14 15 27 8 21
U. of Tennessee
Food Science and Technology
19 28 22 30 2 8 2 6 17 30
U. of Vermont
Animal, Nutrition, and Food Sciences
22 29 20 29 14 22 19 29 21 31
U. of Wisconsin at Madison
Food Science
3 16 2 13 23 29 17 28 1 11
Virginia Tech
Food Science and Technology
7 24 6 26 3 11 13 25 9 24
Washing-
ton State U.

Food Science
2 14 3 18 8 20 29 31 4 21
Methodology: This interactive tool is based on rankings developed by the NRC. For a complete explanation of the methods the research council used, go to its site; registration may be required.

Add Your Comment

Commenting is closed.