The National Collegiate Athletic Association has placed Georgetown University on probation for three years for breaking the association's rules governing financial aid for athletes.
In a report released on Wednesday, the NCAA's Division I Committee on Infractions ruled that coaching staff members in Georgetown's baseball program had misused Federal Work-Study funds by allowing 26 baseball players to receive a total of nearly $62,000 over seven years for work they did not perform.
In addition to imposing the probation, the NCAA has required the university to pay a $61,000 fine and vacate all wins for games that involved the 26 athletes, as well as individual records for athletes and the head coach, Pete Wilk, for those contests.
The university had self-reported the violations and will not appeal the NCAA's ruling.
"We accept responsibility. We accept the NCAA's sanctions, and we're prepared to move forward," Daniel R. Porterfield, Georgetown's interim athletics director, said during a teleconference with reporters.
The NCAA noted that this is Georgetown's first infractions case and that the scope of the violations was narrow. But committee members also said they were troubled by the amount of money involved and the length of time over which the violations occurred.
The baseball players involved earned between $8 and $9 an hour for a variety of tasks at the off-campus baseball facility the university used for its practices and games. They cleaned and removed trash from the field, dugout, and press box; cleaned the locker rooms; and maintained the field, which is not owned by the university.
Assistant coaches were in charge of supervising the athletes' work-study activities, reviewing time cards, and submitting time sheets to the athletics department's business office for payroll processing. From 2000-1 to 2006-7, assistant coaches instructed the athletes to record 20 hours each week on their time cards. They told the athletes they would be given enough work to fulfill those hours, and were not to worry about keeping track of how many hours they actually worked, the report said.
But in many cases, there was not enough work to go around, and those 20 hours were not met.
One assistant coach appeared to consider the athletes entitled to such payments, the report said.
"Although the assistant coach said that he never instructed student-athletes to submit time that would result in their being paid for more hours than they actually worked, it was evident that the assistant coach perceived work-study payments as a financial-aid entitlement for financially needy baseball student-athletes, provided the student-athletes fulfilled the designated assignments and duties," the report says.
Georgetown's president, John J. DeGioia, said in a written statement that the athletes and coaches involved "did not intend to cheat or violate NCAA rules."
The university reported the rules violations to the NCAA last year after an internal investigation. It imposed several additional penalties on itself.
It repaid $61,000 to the U.S. Department of Education to replace the misused federal funds, and froze the number of scholarships available to baseball players. It also created several new policies to more closely monitor the work-study activities of athletes, including one that bars athletes from working for the programs in which they participate.






Comments
1. jdfoub - September 03, 2009 at 11:33 am
Georgetown University is hailed as a leader of Jesuit Catholic education in this country. Does this incident, and more importantly the response to it, reflect the principles of the Jesuit Order? I have worked with many Jesuit Colleges in my travels as a consultant and I've found them to be places of deep religious and moral conviction. The university's response in this case does not seem to match the gravity of the violation committed here. The tone seems to be "everyone cooperated with the investigation, it wasn't a big deal, we can move on now."
So a coach told players to fill out time sheets saying they completed 20 hours of work per week so that they could receive money from a federal program -- funded by the taxes of everyone in the United States -- when any reasonable person looking at this can clearly see that the coach knew these players were not putting in 20 hours. What message does this send when a coach believes his players are entitled to payment for work they did not do?
What moral obligation does Georgetown now have toward the players who falsified government documents stating that they worked hours that they did not work? If Georgetown -- a Jesuit Institution -- says this is acceptable as long as they offer a half-hearted "apology", will these players think it is OK and no big deal? What messages do these players take away from this? What messages does the broader public take away from this? It seems to me one message that is sent is this: Why not cheat on your taxes? If you get caught, just pay them back and say your sorry but you can make it OK by saying you fully cooperated with the investigation.
Moral violations don't happen in isolation. What our religiously based institutions do and how they handle their errors is noticed by students and the public. A Jesuit institution, particularly one held in such esteem as Georgetown should realize this. Georgetown, you can do better than this. You answer to a much higher authority.
2. rsmulcahy - September 03, 2009 at 12:56 pm
I agree Georgetown can do better...but could you clarify who that higher power is, not sure if it is CBS or ESPN you are referring to.
3. rsmulcahy - September 03, 2009 at 12:59 pm
I agree Georgetown can do better...but could you clarify who that higher power is, not sure if it is CBS or ESPN you are referring to.