• Saturday, May 26, 2012
  • Print
  • Comment (6)

In Study Abroad, Simple Is Sophisticated

7 Signs of Successful Study-Abroad Programs 1

James Yang for The Chronicle

Enlarge Image
close 7 Signs of Successful Study-Abroad Programs 1

James Yang for The Chronicle

When I was 23 years old and working for the Peace Corps in Africa, I lived in a mud hut with no running water, no electricity, and virtually no technology or modern-day conveniences. I collected rainwater in containers, bathed in a bucket, and used a latrine outside. I lived with cockroaches, tarantulas, snakes, and other critters. But my life was simple. Today I cannot live without my BlackBerry, every minute of every day is scheduled, and my life is complex.

The difference between my life today and my Africa experience brings to mind the quote from Leonardo da Vinci: "Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication."

My field, study abroad, is far from simple, and if you follow the buzz, you probably know how "unsophisticated" it can be. A recent study at the University of Washington, published in the journal Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, found that many American students double their alcohol consumption while studying abroad in Europe, Australia, or New Zealand. Study abroad has long been associated with partying and, as a recent article in The Chronicle put it, "a perk for wealthy students at selective colleges."

This is disappointing because many of us who work with college students, or send them to other countries to study, have higher aspirations for their international experience than drinking more alcohol or backpacking around Europe. We see study abroad as education, not vacation, and we honestly believe that the study-abroad experience has the potential to change lives, and the world, for the better.

There are two ways in which we can approach education: linear and circular.

Linear education is the traditional approach. It treats the teacher as the giver of knowledge and the student as the receiver. Knowledge is static, passed in one direction, and is one-dimensional.

Circular education takes a systems approach. Education is an interrelational, experiential process to engage with rather than follow. Knowledge is dynamic, passed in various directions, and is multidimensional.

Sophisticated study abroad is more than going to college in another country; it's a shift from linear to circular education.

Instead of asking, "How can we educate international students?," those of us who work with college students ask, "How can we foster international education?" Instead of asking, "What courses and activities can benefit international students and their education?," we ask, "How can we create an atmosphere where local people, culture, art, and the environment are the classroom?" Instead of asking, "How can we integrate international students with locals, businesses, and the community?," we ask, "How can we facilitate communication among them?"

Leonardo was right. Simplicity doesn't mean less or fewer; it means more or greater. What seems complicated and even unrelated becomes something new. For example, we don't typically see six carbon atoms, 12 hydrogen atoms, and six oxygen atoms separately after they have combined. We taste sugar, simple and sophisticated. Think of a well-made crème brûlée.

The chemistry of study abroad isn't so different. The problem is that the approach toward education is usually linear. It doesn't put people and cultures together, it just sends students in. We have seen education as something to give to students, not as something they experience, give, and get. Molecules are constantly changing and rearranging their atoms in chemical reactions to form new molecules and compounds. People and cultures mimic this process.

And that brings me back to my time with tarantulas. Although many students choose traditional, touristic places to study abroad, small communities, like my village in Cameroon, make good laboratories to approach circular education.

Small communities allow for better interpersonal communication. There is a greater opportunity for people-to-people and culture-to-culture bonds. Because they are small, and people are generally more open and unaffected by tourism, there are more interactions of a useful kind. In my Cameroonian village, locals welcomed my presence and invited me to participate in family meals, community groups, school activities, Christian church services, Ramadan, and various other celebrations, ceremonies, and festivals. I became a member of the community and a friend to many who frequently visited and talked with me in my home. I played with children, held many babies, even carried some of them on my back.

The "chemistry" is right because education is not so segregated and isolated. Students are not only learners, they are teachers as well. Locals are not passive; they are active and engaged in the learning process. Knowledge informs, but it also is transformed into something new. In Cameroon I learned that a traditional healer can cast out evil spirits that cause malaria, papaya seeds can cure parasitical infections, everything (even garbage) can be put to good use, and grilled fish bones are healthy and tasty. In turn, my community learned some karate and how a nassara (white woman in the Fulfulde language) can kick. They also learned how to prevent parasites, malaria, and HIV/AIDS.

And the life-changing potential in small communities is different from that in large or tourist-heavy cities. Traditional economic development focuses on export industries without regard to local preferences. It calls for services and amenities to attract tourism, which brings money. But people-centered economic development involves local preferences, consumption, and spending first. After I made banana bread for a group of women, they modified the recipe, African-style, and started selling it in the local market. We formed a United Womens Group, which included members who spoke three languages and belonged to various religious backgrounds, to foster better community and economic development.

Sophisticated study abroad is people-centered and socially responsible. Instead of allowing the economy to chip away at local culture, it cultivates the economy around culture, preserving that culture in the process. Because economic development is centered on locals instead of tourism, it transfers power from large corporations to people who value people. In doing so, it can create a better, more sustainable world.

To make this work, we need to organize more encounters than activities. Putting people in a room together to have an animated discussion about what is needed in a community is different from leading them all to paint a school that someone else decided should be painted.

When study abroad balances global viewpoints with community and education, locals and students are empowered, positive development is encouraged, and the possibilities are endless. Students, and the world, are ready for a simpler and more sophisticated approach.

Wendy Williamson is director of study abroad at Eastern Illinois University, author of Study Abroad 101 (Agapy, 2008), and a co-founder of Facultyled.com and AbroadScout.com, which provide information about study abroad.

 


More from The Global Chronicle

SIGN UP: Get Global Coverage in Your Inbox
JOIN THE CONVERSATION:    Twitter     Facebook      LinkedIn


Comments

1. dcaristi - December 10, 2010 at 07:44 am

Well said. This has certainly been my experience as well. When I had students in Florence, Italy for a month, they spent more time interacting with the thousands (literally) of American students there than with Italians. The semesters I have had American students in Macerata, Italy, have always resulted in students who were more connected to the local culture.

2. 22074041 - December 10, 2010 at 09:16 am

An interesting and well-written piece. But one criticism of study abroad (beside alleged partying), is lack of academic content. The piece is eloquent about the experiential side of study abroad, a very significant side, but appears to be silent on what students can learn about their academic field (e.g.,history, art, engineering, health care, etc.), for which they are earning credits (in most cases) toward a degree. Content(in a subject area) would seem an important element of the experience abroad (even if approached in a non-linear or creative way) - especially when making the case for public and university support, and in differentiating it from "tourism" or "Peace Corps" - as worthy as these are.

3. farleyb - December 10, 2010 at 09:49 am

The experiential and the academic aspects of study abroad are best connected through established principles of experiential and integrative, interdisciplinary approaches to learning. Implementation of such pedagogical approaches provide students with an opportunity to move beyond dualistic thinking about learning to an understanding that few real world or global problems are understood or solved through a single discipline lens. Full learning comes through access to the perspectives of people living in complicated cultural contexts who have their own perspectives to offer students and much to learn from interaction with students. Study abroad can provide the challenge students need to integrate the multiple perspectives they have encountered in their education to the challenges of a complex world.

4. tfcorsi - December 10, 2010 at 11:20 am

Great article Wendy! I completely agree that a holistic, circular education outlook is much richer than a linear one. Students become teachers and teachers in turn learn from their students. Such is the educational experience at certain places such as Oxford university where the tutor and student meet and talk as "equals" in the pursuit of knowledge. This circular transfer of knowledge also happens in small communities as you mention and those people to poeple experiences and sharings are what truly stay with you throughout life!

5. bonefro1 - December 10, 2010 at 12:36 pm

I agree with all the praise for this article -- you have described the keys to understanding between people -- more non-touristic travel is an antidote to prejudice -- and also helps you once again to appreciate how lucky we are as U.S. citizens. Thank you.

6. 22074041 - December 10, 2010 at 02:07 pm

I agree with number 3 above that the "study" part of "study abroad" can and perhaps should be interdisciplinary. But not accenting "content" "substance" and "academic soundness" in programs can make them appear like activities done outside a university or college, rather than as part of an academic degree program with course credits. (And of course it only enhances the critics' view that these adventures are recreational and/or touristic [let alone excuses for drinking and partying] rather than "study" based and/or educational at a university, credit-earning level.)

Add Your Comment

Commenting is closed.