How to Behave Ethically Now, in the Face of an Uncertain Future

To the Editor:

Herschel Elliott and Richard D. Lamm want the specter of environmental collapse to reorder the criteria we use to make moral claims ("A Moral Code for a Finite World," The Review, November 15). If that is the case, then any disaster that is understood to be inevitable can constitute a moral scalpel: The finitude of natural resources can't be the only tool for moral decision making. Their "ethics of the commons" approach makes it unethical to pull one more shipwreck

Print Subscription

Digital Subscription

Already have an account? Log In Now.