January 14, 2005
Evidence Suggests That Publisher's Reuse of Old Material Was More Extensive Than Initially Thought
Librarians and scholars were irked when they heard that Emerald, a major publisher of scholarly journals, had republished hundreds of articles in dozens of journals without noting that the material had already appeared elsewhere. New evidence suggests that the company's practice may go back further than initially thought.
Philip M. Davis, a Cornell University librarian who discovered the republishing, initially used Emerald's electronic databases to find more than 400 republished
This is an article for subscribers only. You may access this article by purchasing a:
Digital or Print Subscription
Web Pass
Already have an account? Log In Now.
-
Administration
-
The Chronicle Review
-
Short Subjects
