• July 23, 2014

Doctoral Students With Large Loans Finish Fastest

Doctoral students who take out large loans complete their degrees more quickly than do students who have smaller loans or no loans, according to a recent study. One possible reason: The large loans free people from the need to take part-time jobs, which cut into time available for their graduate work.

The study, by two researchers at the University of Kansas School of Education, used data from the National Science Foundation's Survey of Earned Doctorates to examine whether loan amount influences the time it takes to complete a doctoral degree. The data came from all 43,354 people who received doctorates in the 12-month period ending in June 2005.

The study was conducted by Dongbin Kim, an assistant professor at Kansas, and Cindy Otts, a doctoral student. An early draft of a report on the study, "The Effect of Loans on Time to Doctorate Degree," was presented at the Association for Institutional Research conference in 2008, and now The Journal of Higher Education has published the paper's final version.

The study defined a "large loan" as one exceeding $50,000 for undergraduate and graduate study combined. It found that, except in the social sciences, students with large loans tended to complete their doctoral degrees more quickly. Ms. Kim said that large loans may let doctoral candidates dedicate themselves to being full-time students, which would shorten their time to complete their degrees. Also, she suggested that students with large loans may want to finish their degrees quickly so they can start paying off the debt sooner.

The study acknowledges an important limitation: It did not include data from students who drop out of programs, who make up more than half of all doctoral students. It is possible that some students drop out because of the burden of large loans, but because there are no data available for those students, this study considers only degree recipients.

Discomfort as a Motivator

Sharon M. Brucker is one of the authors of Educating Scholars (Princeton University Press), which includes a chapter on how financial support influences the completion of doctorates. While the book doesn't look specifically at loans, Ms. Brucker said, people who have guaranteed financial packages tend to take longer to complete degrees.

"When you're comfortable, it takes longer," she said. "When you're uncomfortable, you're going to get finished."

Ms. Kim and Ms. Otts's study also looks at how the specific type of financial assistance a student receives affects the amount of time it takes to complete a degree. For instance, the analysis shows that students who are compensated for being teaching assistants take longer to finish than students who receive support in the form of research assistantships or fellowships.

"If they want to be a faculty member eventually, having teaching experience could be very important," Ms. Kim said. However, she added, for students who wish to go other routes, teaching may simply delay the amount of time it takes them to get a degree, without any direct benefit to their career.

Peter A. Rickman, a co-president of the Teaching Assistants' Association at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, was not surprised that the study found that being a teaching assistant can lengthen the amount of time it takes to complete a degree. However, he said, being a research assistant or project assistant could have a similar effect. He added that assistantships are crucial even for the students who don't want to stay in academe.

"Assistantships are an important part of every grad's time in school, beyond just the funding concerns," he said. "It's really important for grads to be contributing to an academic community."

The study did not look expressly at financial support in the summer, but Ms. Brucker said that such assistance is critical.

"We found that, of all the kinds of financial support, one of the kinds that made the biggest difference is to have additional support in the summer," she said. "In the sciences, everyone has support in the summer. In the humanities, it is much less common."

Patterns by Race

The study also examines how the relationship between loan amount and time to degree is affected by race and ethnicity, field of study, and type of institution.

Ms. Kim noted that black and Hispanic students are less likely than their Asian and white counterparts to receive research assistantships. A research assistantship can help prepare a student for the job market, she said, and shorten the time it takes to complete a degree. Though faculty members would probably want to choose research assistants based on merit alone, she said, it would be good for professors to have an incentive, like a grant, to give research assistantships to black and Hispanic students.

With regard to field of study, students in the humanities took the longest to complete their degrees, followed by students in education and the social sciences. Engineering students finished most quickly. The analysis also showed that students in the humanities and social sciences were twice as likely to borrow at the graduate level than students in engineering, the physical sciences, and biological sciences.

Finally, the study showed that, except for tuition and Carnegie classification, an institution's characteristics do not affect the time it takes students to complete their degrees.

It found that doctoral students at research-intensive institutions borrow more than those at research-extensive institutions, and that students in the social sciences at research-extensive institutions take significantly longer to complete a doctorate.

It also found that students in the biological sciences, engineering, and the humanities at institutions with higher tuition take significantly longer to complete their doctorates.

Comments

1. timlincoln - February 10, 2010 at 08:45 am

Research like this would be improved by knowing the loan and work patterns of those who did not finish. Of course, a broader question is this: In general, is it better for students to finish their doctorarates "quickly" or not? And for whom is it better? Perhaps it would be better for a given field to have fewer doctoral students, fewer drop outs, and a longer time in graduate school.
My own experience as a doctoral agrees with Ms. Brucker's observation that financial discomfort is a motivator to make progress towards the degree.

2. pambrown15 - February 10, 2010 at 10:00 am

The following statement implies that black and Hispanic students are of less merit than their Asian and white peers, when (obviously) there may be other reasons for the disparity:

"Ms. Kim noted that black and Hispanic students are less likely than their Asian and white counterparts to receive research assistantships... Though faculty members would probably want to choose research assistants based on merit alone, she said, it would be good for professors to have an incentive, like a grant, to give research assistantships to black and Hispanic students."

3. 11272784 - February 10, 2010 at 12:04 pm

Is the reason really important? The effective outcone is "Duh". I know the more debt I was building up, the more motivated I would be to finish up and get out of dodge.

4. jasioconnor - February 10, 2010 at 12:27 pm

I have to agree with the previous poster -- it wasn't hard to guess at possible reasons after reading the headline. I'm hoping the article has a little more meat to it.

5. camillemata - February 10, 2010 at 12:30 pm

True, the incentive to finish is raised with loans, but the curriculum can also be very draining. I trained in Australia for one of my master's degrees and learned a little bit about post-baccalaureate programs while there. There appears to be less emphasis on elective classes, enabling graduate students to focus more on core principles and theories. The PhD is generally only about 4 to 5 years, while in the U.S, the PhD can take as many as 8 to 10 years to complete. Graduate programs in the U.S are becoming more and more like a career move, and focuses too much on rote learning. In Australia, I learned to apply the conceptual tools to real world situations and found I was able to begin publishing in peer-reviewed journals early. I now have at least 3 peer-reviewed articles and a couple of book reviews, which I credit to the M.A. by coursework I earned at the University of Wollongong.

Loans, moreover, should not the the primary source of help given the turbulence of the employment market. And, let's not forget that despite the race and gender achivements of the last decades, employment opportunities remain unequal.

6. johntoradze - February 10, 2010 at 12:45 pm

Students taking out large loans are like students who have their own money. They come free of charge to PIs, and so they have more freedom to choose what they want to do. Such students can also focus on doing their work.

TA ships in the USA are very high workloads in sciences. TAs put in more hours than professors do for the courses. I had a TA-ship that was a 50 hour per week job and that included catching numerous errors in the instructional materials. If a person supports themselves with TA-ships they won't have time to work on their PhD. All told, such students may spend 1 year of dedicated work on their PhD project.

Students who are paid as RA's are lab slaves. They make 2/3 to 1/2 what full time RAs make, but their PIs work the time and a half. Most of the work they do is not for their thesis project, and because of how they are supported, they do what they are told to do.

Students that are RA's if they are good technicians, since they are cheap, are kept back by PI's in order to retain their services. I have seen several times where the top students were not graduated, but a mediocre one was shuffled through quickly - they weren't lousy enough to kick out, but they weren't worth keeping. This occurred among students in the same labs.

Moral? Do what you must to focus on your work and don't depend on a PI. Don't go with the flow or you get flushed.

7. pokerphd - February 10, 2010 at 01:54 pm

At first read my reacton is, "Really? We needed a study to tell us that money is motivational?"

I would be keenly interested in direct and indirect measures of other motivating factors. For example, I had a full tuition scholarship and TA stipend toward PhD study (humanities) at Research I public university. That is, I could get by with little or no additional debt. What got me out the door in 5 years was

1. a dissertation director who was engaged, set me on a course, checking in regularly, and provided a timeline and impetus to complete the degree, and

2. a university policy that said that the aforementioned funding was for 4 years only with the possibility (which I attained) of a 1-year instructorship for a fifth year, if i was significantly on progress to degree completion

Were such factors considered in this study?

8. sjsuhousing - February 10, 2010 at 02:47 pm

Ground breaking research.

9. 11175795 - February 10, 2010 at 10:47 pm

I agree with pambrown15. Here we go again stereotyping black and hispanic students. When will it ever end? Surely the author must have known of qualified black and/or hispanic students. In most instances, merit has little to do with whether a black or hispanic student receives funding.

CWP

10. nrklomp - February 11, 2010 at 09:46 am

That is why I own a house, to force myself through PhD-land faster. Debt makes slave work faster!

Add Your Comment

Commenting is closed.

subscribe today

Get the insight you need for success in academe.