The American Association of University Professors issued a report today accusing Clark Atlanta University of numerous violations of faculty rights in connection with its dismissal of about a fourth of its faculty members last year.
The report, by an AAUP investigative committee, concludes that the university's administration declared a nonexistent "enrollment emergency" last February as a pretext for firing about 55 full-time faculty members without due process.
The investigative committee says the historically black college's administration showed a disregard for shared governance by deciding on the layoffs without faculty input. The administration's selection of which faculty members to fire appears to have been based largely on a desire to shed those faculty members it regarded as unwanted, and both the university's president, Carlton E. Brown, and its associate vice president for academic affairs, Jeffrey J. Phillips, "seemed to view tenure as having no particular significance when it came to making decisions about whom to lay off," the committee's report says.
The report also accuses the administration of giving far too little notice of dismissal to the faculty members—who were told by letter on February 6 that their jobs had been eliminated, "effective today"—and of offering faculty members far too little severance pay. All of those laid off were offered severance packages equal to an additional four weeks' pay. Those who agreed to sign severance agreements releasing the university from any potential legal claims were given additional severance payments ranging from two to eight weeks' salary.
A spokeswoman for Clark Atlanta, Jennifer Jiles, declined today to comment on the report, saying that it was still being reviewed by officials there. In a letter to the AAUP responding to a prepublication draft of the report, President Brown argued that, considering the economic climate and the university's recent enrollment declines, "it should be clear to any objective person" that the actions taken by the university were "absolutely essential."
"Please know that we understand and have always understood the position that the AAUP would take on this matter," Mr. Brown's letter said. "Our number one priority, however, has been and will always be the preservation of this fine institution for the students it serves now and will serve in the future."
A chief point of contention between the AAUP and Clark Atlanta is the university's unorthodox decision to base its layoffs on a declaration of "enrollment emergency," defined in its handbook as "a sudden or unplanned progressive decline in student enrollment the detrimental financial effects of which are too great or too rapid to be offset by normal procedures in the handbook." Although the AAUP's guidelines for colleges allow them to terminate faculty appointments based on declarations of "financial exigency," the association does not recognize an "enrollment emergency" as a legitimate basis for terminating faculty members before the end of their specified terms of employment.
The report also disputes President Brown's assertion that the university faced an actual enrollment emergency. It argues that Mr. Brown's prediction that enrollment would drop from 4,100 in the fall-2008 semester to 3,400 in the spring-2009 semester was based partly on his own efforts to curtail enrollment, which ended up being nearly 4,000 anyway.
"The investigating committee has found no evidence to support the administration's claimed enrollment crisis," the report says, and in fact "finds credible that in all likelihood the administration, and President Brown in particular, attempted to manipulate enrollment numbers in order to establish plausible grounds to dismiss faculty members summarily."









Comments
1. major_ray - January 13, 2010 at 05:16 pm
These actions by the administration give me flash-backs from being an executive dean at an urban community college. I am retired now. My service in Vietnam as a combat medic was not as traumatic as my years dealing with brain dead college administrators. As a former tenured faculty member and a college VIP, I can tell you about closed door wheeling and dealing. What happened to these faculty members is no different than what happens to Haitians. It all in the leadership! Even in America's top universities I had to go around "Happy Negroes" as an African American scientist. When will this nightmare of incompetence end.
Major Ray
2. princeton67 - January 13, 2010 at 08:00 pm
The only power the AAUP has is what a college grants it. This "union" is not the UAW or ILA or any blue-collar union. The faculty is not going to go on strike, because there are hundred's of PHD's, with publications, who would gladly scab. As the CHE's own #4 "Most Popular Article" (link above) notes, "Graduate School in the Humanities: Just Don't Go."
3. jung_gt - January 13, 2010 at 11:07 pm
This summary is inaccurate in one respect. The actual enrollment numbers ended up being close to 4,000 in the spring, only a slight decline from the fall enrollment of 4,100. According to the former VP for Student Services, Carlton Brown was unhappy that spring enrollment was at 3700 with a week still to go in the enrollment period, and instructed his VPSS to stop enrolling students immediately. With the students already in the enrollment pipeline, the final numbers approached 4,000, well over 3,700. Carlton Brown, the Pres., had predicted to the Board of Trustees that spring enrollment would decline to 3,400, and apparently wanted that enrollment decline as a pretext to fire massive numbers of faculty, both tenured and non-tenured, without any due process. Why should the President of a private university, heavily dependent on student enrollment, want to lower student enrollment? It was befuddling to the former VP for Student Services, and should provoke a lot of questions from the Board of Trustees.
4. pschmidt - January 14, 2010 at 10:21 am
Thanks for pointing out the inaccuracy, jung_gt. I had missed the more up-to-date enrollment figure contained elsewhere in the report. The story has been revised to include the correct enrollment number.--Peter Schmidt
5. wturnertsu - January 14, 2010 at 12:26 pm
If the action taken by Administrators at AU is as reported, it is most unfortunate, indeed. AU is not a plantation and persons in position of leadership aren't plantation owners. As one of our flagship Institutions of Higher Learning, one would expect that the faculty there is deserving of more respect and greater consideration than they were shown. Even if time was of essence, one would have expected that impacted faculty would have at least been afforded some input in the decision-making process. If faculty at AU were treated so shabbily, imagine how faculty at some of our other colleges and universities must fare, during this economic crisis.
6. jbraxton - January 15, 2010 at 09:00 pm
Major Ray,
We are blessed that we aren't living in Haiti under their mismanagement government. Yes, it is all in
"leadership", "goverence", "integrity", "values", and etc. I just returned from Belize, aka, British Hondurus, and I observed so much poverty.
Although, I'm an African American female, I'm so glad to be living in United States.
J.
7. joeycoco45 - January 15, 2010 at 11:25 pm
Can you say Moral Turpitude? Sad just sad. An embarrassment to the institution and the real victims here are the dismissed faculty, embarrassed alumni and the mis-served students. Hopefully the institution can move to secure real leadership with integrity before it's too late.